Industry Perspective - Fintech companies are launching Layer 1 (L1) blockchains instead of building on Ethereum [1] - Ethereum proponents are reacting negatively to Fintech companies launching L1s [1] Sentiment Analysis - The Ethereum community's reaction is characterized by "copium and entitlement" [1] - The arguments against Fintech L1s are considered "weak" [1]

call me crazy but all these corporations launching L1s is likely bullish LINK the most? ...

all these corporations launching L1s instead of L2s (or just using existing L1s) has nothing to do with product experience or distribution btwyou can build the same customizations with 100x less pain by creating L2 or using something like extensions on Solanathe reason must simply be that L1s can be worth hundreds of billions and when youre at that size theres just not many other billion dollar shots you can take ...

Based on the provided content, it's challenging to derive industry-specific insights as the document is simply stating "it's raining" with a link Weather Observation - The document reports rainfall [1]

RT tunez (evm/acc) 🤖 (@cryptunez)People often claim that L1s have a premium. This is wrong.In reality, L2s have a premium.Their tokens are not used for anything, yet somehow launch at multi-billion dollar valuations before going down only. https://t.co/S5PkDMk9bQ ...

Layer-1 Daily Active Addresses Comparison - BNB has more daily active addresses than Solana [1] - NEAR has more daily active addresses than TRON [1] - Ronin has more daily active addresses than Aptos [1] - Bitcoin has more daily active addresses than Ethereum [1]