Security Risks in Blockchain - Solana founder argues L2s and bridges like Wormhole share the same worst-case risk: multisigs can upgrade contracts and move assets without users' knowledge [1] - The core issue is whether a set of external keys can control user funds [1] - Multisigs effectively define the sequencer's authority [1] - Under current designs, L2s do not truly inherit Ethereum's security [1]

User Experience & Performance - Users prioritize the capacity and latency improvements that chains can achieve, leading to better apps and UX [1] - Chains settling to Ethereum can offer performance identical to any L1 but with reduced overhead (consensus) [1] Security & Trust - While chains aim for security parity or improvement over time, this is not the primary concern for users [2] - Existing L2s have a permissioned multisig that can override the bridge contract without notice [2] - Escape hatch is a property of the bridge, not the L2 itself [2] Technical Feasibility - There is no engineering blocker to build a bridge on Solana [2]

Layer-2 Ecosystem Growth - Starknet 持续两年增加开发者 [1] - Arbitrum 流失 30% 的开发者，Polygon 流失 35% 的开发者 [1] - Cairo 6 个月的学习曲线过滤了追逐 grant 的雇佣兵 [1] - 致力于 Starknet 的开发者不会离开 [1] Market Valuation - STRK 市值 5.17 亿美元 [1] - STRK 的估值被认为像垂死的 Layer-2 项目，但实际上它是唯一增长的 [1]

Layer-2 (L2) Solutions - L2 solutions are suitable for many use cases when the infrastructure functions correctly [1] - The critical vulnerability of L2 solutions arises in approximately 5% of cases when infrastructure failures occur [1] Solana Network - Solana's current architecture, relying on a single client, makes it susceptible to vulnerabilities from bugs in that client until it adopts multi-client infrastructure [1]

Layer-2 Scaling Solutions - MegaETH aims to push Ethereum to its limits and beyond [1] - The industry is exploring which other Layer-2 solutions (L2s) can achieve similar scalability [1]

RT RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄 (@RyanSAdams)I asked @vnovakovski the founder of @Lighter_xyz why other platforms are still building for L1s and citing performance reasons?"idk, maybe they made a technical choice 2 years ago that's not relevant today. Those guys should go talk to @SuccinctLabs."He says there's no performance limitation to L2s - Lighter could run at 1m TPS now if it needed to."The more secure the L1, the more performant the L2."It seems Lighter is an L2 for one simple reason.A better product ...

Technology & Blockchain - The author has no issue against Layer 2 solutions [1] - The author acknowledges Solana is not perfect [1] - The author argues against labeling Stage 0/1 servers as Ethereum [1] - The author suggests a case could be made for Stage 2 rollups [1]

Risks and Concerns - User funds are held on off-chain servers, posing risks, especially with increasing economic volatility [1] - Until this year, none of these servers were even Stage 1, and still, none of them are Stage 2 [1] - Users may suffer losses due to being skeptical of L2 solutions being "Ethereum" [1] - A forced transaction delay of 18 days exists [1] Technical Distinctions - Technical distinctions between Ethereum and other platforms matter [1] - The market values Ethereum's value in L2s [2] Industry Perspective - Some "Solana" people (technical individuals) are skeptical about everything being Ethereum due to technical differences [1] - Fidelity argues that Ethereum's value is the GDP on top of it, meaning its value is in L2s [2]

RT MariusVanDerWijden (@vdWijden)PSA: Blob originators will need to update their blob transaction creation code after Fusaka. For all L2s, please make sure you submit blob transactions with cell proofs after the fork!https://t.co/GzrPxgrjE4 ...

Join us on September 24 for an AMA with @GOATRollup – we’ll explore why Bitcoin security, miners, and stakeholders all depend on L2s to thrive, and how GOAT Network is building the future of Bitcoin-native applications.🕒 10 AM EST[Brought to you by @GOATRollup] https://t.co/Xj2bAGzYWE ...