💡 Key Takeaways🔹 Track your 15-day point balance daily: inactivity drops you below 220-230 eligibility thresholds🔹 Exit delisted tokens before Dec. 19 when spreads widen and liquidity dries up🔹 Monitor when funding rates exceed 0.01%: historically signals 20%+ correction within 48 hours🔹 Brace for Jan. 13 CPI release as primary catalyst for volatility flush🔹 Avoid low-cap tokens with 3x+ turnover: exits become difficult during selloffsStay informed, stay ahead:https://t.co/8jZzrytttH8/8 ...

IOSG：Some Thoughts on Altseason in This CycleThe article argues that a 2021-style broad altseason is unlikely to return due to expanded token supply, fragmented liquidity and attention, institutional preference for BTC/ETH, and lack of breakout apps. Instead, altcoin performance will likely be slower, more selective, and fundamentals-driven—favoring DeFi blue chips and strong projects, while liquidity polarizes between institutional-grade assets and high-risk memes, with mid-tier tokens struggling.Read more ...

Core Insights - The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) target U.S. small-cap stocks but differ in costs, diversification, and income potential [5][6] - IJR has a larger asset base of $88 billion and higher liquidity with an average daily trading volume of over 6 million shares, making it more appealing for investors prioritizing liquidity [7] - ISCB offers broader diversification with 1,539 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to IJR's 0.06%, which may attract cost-conscious investors [3][8] Cost Comparison - IJR provides a higher dividend yield of 1.9% compared to ISCB's 1.2%, which is significant for income-focused investors [3][8] - The expense ratio for ISCB is 0.04%, while IJR charges 0.06%, indicating a marginal cost advantage for ISCB [3][8] Portfolio Composition - IJR holds 635 names with significant sector weights in financial services, industrials, and technology, while ISCB has a more diversified portfolio with 1,539 holdings across similar sectors [1][2][8] - The largest positions in ISCB, such as Ciena, Coherent, and Rocket Lab, each account for less than 1% of assets, reflecting its diversified approach [2] Investment Strategy - Investors seeking maximum liquidity and confidence in fund size may prefer IJR, while those looking for lower costs and broader diversification might opt for ISCB, despite its lower trading volume [9]

RT Leon Waidmann 🔥 (@LeonWaidmann)I keep coming back to this chart because it cuts through the noise.👇Ethereum is not just another smart contract platform.It has become the settlement layer for global dollar liquidity.On a regular day👇🔹 Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90 to $100B in stablecoin transfers🔹 This is real value moving onchain, not DeFi loops or incentive farming🔹 Mostly USDT and USDC used for payments, treasury management, and settlementWhat stands out to me👇🔹 This volume does not chase narr ...

Market Opportunity - Arthur Hayes suggests that altcoins, significantly impacted by the ~$19 billion liquidation event in October, now offer an opportunity for investors who maintained capital [1] Monetary Policy Impact - The report indicates that the Federal Reserve's resumption of money-printing via Reserve Management Purchases is expected to increase liquidity and leverage [1] - The analysis suggests that increased liquidity will initially benefit Bitcoin (BTC) and subsequently lead to a recovery in altcoins [1]

Group 1 - Fresh US economic data indicates easing inflation pressures, but consumers are still under strain, suggesting improving macro conditions with potential near-term volatility for Bitcoin and the broader crypto market [1] - US consumer sentiment increased to 52.9 in December, which is nearly 30% lower than a year ago, while short-term inflation expectations dropped to 4.2% and long-term expectations eased to 3.2% [2][3] - Falling inflation expectations suggest households believe price pressures are easing, supporting the Federal Reserve's goal of cooling inflation without maintaining restrictive policies for too long [3][4] Group 2 - Lower inflation expectations reduce the necessity for high interest rates, leading markets to price in earlier or deeper rate cuts, which is significant for risk assets like crypto [5] - Historically, Bitcoin has responded more to liquidity conditions than to consumer confidence or economic growth, indicating a potential positive outlook for the crypto market as financial conditions loosen [5][6] - Lower interest rates typically reduce returns on cash and bonds, leading to a gradual loosening of financial conditions [6]

RT Kyle Chassé 🐸 (@Kylechasse)THE LIQUIDITY TIMELINE: JANUARY → MARCH DOUBT → RACES@CryptoHayes maps the trade.January strength.Then March doubt hits when everyone asks if it’s “temporary until April.”If they reaffirm the flow stays on… it’s off to the races.Watch the full video in the comments. https://t.co/PH4MUd3378 ...

RT NEAR Protocol (@NEARProtocol)Starknet is officially live on NEAR Intents.Users can now leverage NEAR Intents to swap 120+ native assets from major chains ↔ STRK with zero bridging steps and no chain-hopping.Unified liquidity. Instant execution. Verifiable infrastructure. Any pair is NEAR. https://t.co/7W75Psxn8W ...

Enter ZK Gateway. It aggregates proofs to enable trustless, atomic message passing with ~1s hops.No more 7-day waits or L2<>L1<>L2 bridging loops.A liquidation on Chain A can now verify collateral on Chain B in near real-time. This is how we unify the liquidity layer. https://t.co/jahCEdfaoj ...

Ethereum’s moat is its +$122B DeFi collateral.But until now, high-performance trading forced a choice: stay on L1 and lag, or bridge to an isolated appchain and fragment liquidity.@BlockworksRes latest report breaks down how Atlas fixes this powering @grvt_io Market layer. https://t.co/uEZHxwrOCo ...