Web2 built on trustWeb3 builds on truth ...

Core Argument - The talk challenges the audience to critically examine their consumption of "true crime" stories and question the narratives they present [1] - It advocates for a deeper understanding of justice, truth, and harm by looking beyond stereotypes and reflecting on the systems in place [1] - The presentation emphasizes the importance of empathy, curiosity, and care when engaging with crime stories [1] Speaker's Expertise - Natacha Harding's background in law, storytelling, and education informs her perspective on criminal justice narratives [1] - Her research focuses on miscarriages of justice, victim-survivor politics, and crime fiction [1] - She champions the role of storytelling in criminal justice and aims to challenge preconceived notions about criminal harm [1] Call to Action - The talk encourages the audience to question whose truth is being consumed and what perspectives are being omitted in crime stories [1] - It serves as a call to action to explore crime stories with greater empathy and consideration for those affected by them [1]

Core Argument - The legal system prioritizes adherence to rules and procedures over the pursuit of truth, potentially leading to unjust outcomes [1] - The introduction of AI in the judiciary could improve efficiency but also risks perpetuating existing biases present in historical data [5][6][7] - AI should be used to support the judiciary by handling simple cases and administrative tasks, freeing up judges to focus on complex cases requiring human judgment and empathy [9][10][14] AI in Judiciary - Some countries are already implementing AI in their judicial systems for tasks such as case classification, analysis, and even generating draft judgments [3][4] - Estonia is testing an AI system for resolving small civil disputes up to 7,000 EUR, while the US uses AI to assess recidivism risk [4] - AI's ability to quickly analyze vast amounts of data can improve efficiency, but its reliance on historical data can lead to biased outcomes [5][9] Concerns and Limitations - AI algorithms learn from past data, which may contain biases and prejudices, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes [5][6][7] - Justice requires empathy, compassion, and responsibility, qualities that AI currently lacks, making it unsuitable for making final judgments in all cases [19] - Human judges are essential for considering the context and nuances of individual cases, ensuring that justice is served in a fair and equitable manner [14][15][17][18] Call to Action - Society needs to actively participate in the debate and decision-making process regarding the implementation of AI in the judiciary to ensure that it aligns with human values and principles [22] - It is crucial to define the boundaries of AI's role in the legal system, determining which cases are suitable for AI resolution and which require human judgment [20][21]

Good afternoon everyone. My name is Ing, founder of a local skincare brand and the owner of the channel on YouTube. Some of you might have seen me pop up on your for you page yelling about a sunscreen or maybe calling out a sketchy beauty claim.Some of you might have thought to yourself, "Who is this guy and why is he so angry at a sunscreen?" To be fair, they started it. When I began reviewing beauty products based on science, I didn't think I'd make enemies. But I learned quickly in an industry built on i ...

Product Launch & Features - Mira launched Verify system, a new interaction method in beta, aiming to solve the internet's truth problem [1] - Mira Verify uses multi-model consensus to identify hallucinations and misinformation [1] - The system identifies small errors effectively [1] User Engagement - A waitlist application is available for the beta version [1] - Users can apply by submitting their email addresses [1] Company Positioning - Mira positions itself as the "multi-sig of truth" [1]

"No! I don't care about the money. It's really important to have a source of truth."Elon Muskhttps://t.co/UIoNgLh7FY ...

Over the last few days, a number of members of your caucus have been posting and engaging in some of the discourse about Jeffrey Epstein. Is this appropriate for your members to be doing so. Do you want to see any action on that front.The American people deserve to know the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth as it relates to this whole sorted Jeffrey Epstein matter. Democrats didn't put the Jeffrey Epstein thing into the public domain. This was a conspiracy that Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, and t ...

When even spy agencies have to put loyalty to the leader above objectivity and truth, the whole nation loses, and becomes less safe, says @andreaskluth (via @opinion) https://t.co/JUP7fcy6iN ...

"AI needs to say the truth & know the truth, even if the truth is unpopular”Elon Muskhttps://t.co/op3xbqh0m7 ...

If I say the word forensics, what do you think of? I bet some of you right now are thinking of a white chalk outline of a body on the floor. Detectives and people in white lab suits. And all around there's a police tape which reads, "Crime scene. do not cross. At Forensic Architecture, we're detectives of a kind, but we don't work for the police or for governments.We investigate them. We're the kind of detectives that aren't usually allowed inside that crime scene. Instead, we're outside with the rest of so ...