Regulatory Landscape & Taxation - India's tax office (CBDT) initiates formal discussions with crypto firms, signaling a potential shift from its stringent stance [1] - CBDT seeks input on designing a workable regulatory regime for virtual digital assets (VDAs) [1] - Stakeholders are consulted on the 30% flat tax and the 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on trades [2] - CBDT addresses concerns regarding derivatives, cross-border transactions, and compliance with the OECD's new global reporting standard [2] Industry Concerns & Market Impact - The industry argues that current tax rules stifle liquidity and drive traders to friendlier markets [2] - Crypto exchanges compare India's regulations with those in other major jurisdictions [3] - The current framework taxes crypto more heavily than equities, treating every trade as a taxable event, hindering domestic activity [3] Future Outlook - Legal experts suggest the consultations could be the first step towards comprehensive regulation [3] - Crypto firms hope for a fairer tax regime and clarity on oversight [3] - India's future actions will determine its role in the global digital asset market [4]

South Korea’s financial regulator to submit stablecoin regulation bill in October https://t.co/J7eCnXeljw ...

AI 监管与政策 - 行业共识转变：整个行业逐渐意识到需要对 AI 进行合理监管，保持行业健康发展 [1] - 政策制定需谨慎：政策制定者应充分了解技术，避免仓促立法，对创新造成阻碍 [1] - 监管应适度：在 AI 技术发展初期就进行严格监管可能会扼杀创新，应在技术成熟后再决定如何监管 [1] - 行动计划的意义：美国政府的 AI 行动计划标志着一种转变，即在 AI 发展中纳入技术专家的意见 [4] 开源 AI 的讨论与转变 - 开源 AI 的争议：早期对开源 AI 的批评主要集中在潜在风险上，例如可能被用于制造生物武器 [2] - 行业态度的转变：随着中国在 AI 模型方面的快速发展，行业对开源 AI 的态度发生了转变，意识到限制开源可能会阻碍创新 [1] - 开源 AI 的商业模式：开源 AI 逐渐被视为一种可行的商业策略，尤其是在满足政府和传统行业对安全和控制的需求方面 [5] AI 风险与机遇 - AI 发展需平衡风险与机遇：在关注 AI 潜在风险的同时，也应充分认识到 AI 在科学发现和解决全球性问题方面的巨大潜力 [7][8] - 评估 AI 风险需谨慎：在评估 AI 风险时，应基于科学依据，避免夸大风险，并借鉴以往技术发展的经验 [3] - 避免过度监管：不应因对 AI 系统缺乏完全理解而阻止其部署，而应通过教育、测试等方式来管理风险，充分利用 AI 的价值 [12]

Regulatory Focus - Hong Kong regulator tightens custody standards for crypto exchanges [1] Risk Management - Rising global risks in the crypto market necessitate stricter regulations [1]

Regulatory Updates - ESMA provided recommendations to streamline prospectuses [1] - Key proposals aim to facilitate capital market activity by reducing regulatory burden [1] Prospectus Regulation - Final Reports on Prospectus Regulation are available [1] Civil Liability - Final Reports on civil prospectus liability are available [1]

We need to see a better regulation so that after 2028 we can significantly increase our investments and that requires a different regulation. So we're waiting for politics to decide on the course but irrespective of that for us the growth story is unbroken. So we are now waiting for the final determination of the future regulation which then tells us how much we can invest.Okay. what is the lag time between getting some of those regulatory hurdles eliminated or or at least softened for you and actually spee ...

"We need better regulation so we can significantly increase our investments."EON CEO Leonhard Birnbaum tells @KritiGuptaNews the European energy provider is "waiting for politics" before it can ramp-up spending https://t.co/3dFcdCTthQ https://t.co/YQUVXbuAO6 ...

Media Representation & Misinformation - The Financial Times article inaccurately uses "Bitcoin" and "crypto" interchangeably, creating a misleading impression that they are the same [1][2] - This conflation of Bitcoin with other cryptocurrencies leads to an oversimplified narrative and flawed analysis, especially when considering systemic risk and company holdings [2][3][4] - Misinformation in mainstream media can influence policymakers who may form opinions about Bitcoin without consulting experts or primary data [4] - Brandolini's Law highlights the disproportionate effort required to correct misinformation compared to producing it, potentially leading to significant policy mistakes [8] Regulatory Impact - Flawed media coverage has influenced lawmaking, as seen in the UK Treasury Select Committee's report grouping Bitcoin and altcoins together, which later aligned with the FCA's ban on crypto derivatives for retail investors [5] - Early drafts of the EU's MiCA legislation included provisions that could have effectively banned proof-of-work networks like Bitcoin due to misconceptions about its energy use [6] - Media-driven misconceptions about Bitcoin have already influenced regulation, and continued flawed coverage could lead to Bitcoin being regulated based on fiction rather than fact [7] Bitcoin's Unique Characteristics - Bitcoin is a decentralized, fixed supply network with a clear monetary policy and a 16-year uptime, distinguishing it from the broader category of "crypto" [2] - Adding Bitcoin to a company's treasury as a long-term reserve asset differs significantly from speculating on illiquid, high-volatility altcoins in terms of risk profile, motives, and market signal [3]

I just think the main story here is there is a very strong regulatory tailwind behind the space right now. All eyes on crypto today as both Bitcoin and Ethereum silently about to break all-time highs. And just for perspective, looking at the Ethereum price, ETH hasn't broken its 2021 all-time high since 2021.That's around $4,800, down 8%, only 8% from where we are today. Altcoin daily subscribers have been ready for this since the Ethereum lows. Now, obviously, I was accumulating at these lows, but in 2023, ...

Regulatory Landscape - Paxos has applied to the OCC to convert its New York State trust charter into a national trust charter [1] - Approval would bring Paxos under federal oversight in the U S [1] - Paxos holds existing regulatory licenses in Europe (FIN-FSA), Singapore (MAS), and Abu Dhabi (FSRA) [1]