那么，在鑫慷嘉事件中，这位关键人物"黄先生"到底是谁呢？ 黄先生是否就是黄鑫？ 真实的鑫慷嘉目前处于一种什么状况？2025年7月9日，记者来到深圳市龙岗区南湾街道宝岭社区 龙泉别墅8区K70栋，即深圳鑫慷嘉大数据服务有限公司（下称"深圳鑫慷嘉"）的注册地试图一探 究竟。但在现场，记者并未发现有与鑫慷嘉相关的企业标识。记者经多方查询后得知，因"通过登 记的住所或者经营场所无法联系"，深圳鑫慷嘉已于2月份被深圳市市场监督管理局龙岗监管局列 入经营异常名录。 对此，林大松向记者表示，运营鑫慷嘉的主体是贵州鑫慷嘉大数据服务有限公司（下称"贵州鑫慷 嘉"）。出于推行所谓"四大战区"发展策略的需要，他们虽然亦分别在很多地方注册了一些公司， 但主要是为了广告宣传，并没有实质性的办公，深圳鑫慷嘉就属于这一情形。 值得注意的是，从参与创设到退出，黄鑫从来没有在贵州鑫慷 嘉担任具体管理职务。在贵州鑫慷嘉"主要人员"一栏中，亦没 有姓黄的人士。那么，被视为鑫慷嘉灵魂人物的"黄先生"，究 竟是谁呢？ 作者：邹永勤 封图：图虫创意 "加入鑫慷嘉，幸福千万家！"这句在近半年来十分火爆的洗脑式宣传语句，突然变得极具讽刺意 味，原因是作为宣 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "DGCX Xin Kang Jia Data" trading platform, known as "Xin Kang Jia," is facing severe allegations of financial misconduct, including withdrawal suspensions and platform crashes, leading to a significant loss of trust among its 1.8 million members and over 10 billion yuan involved [1][10]. Company Structure and Operations - Xin Kang Jia operates under the entity "Guizhou Xin Kang Jia Data Service Co., Ltd.," which was established in March 2021 by three individuals, including Huang Xin, who later transferred their shares to Liu Hailiang in April 2024 [2][3]. - The platform's rapid growth is attributed to its promotion of a "state-owned enterprise" identity and the use of digital currency for transactions, employing a "pyramid scheme" model to attract investments through member recruitment [4][5]. Allegations and Legal Issues - The platform has been linked to illegal fundraising activities, with regulatory bodies in various provinces issuing warnings about its operations, labeling it as a typical pyramid scheme [10][11]. - The name "DGCX" in the platform's title falsely implies a connection to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange, which has not authorized any operations in China [9][10]. Current Status and Future Prospects - Following the withdrawal of key shareholders and the announcement of a company dissolution, the platform has been unable to facilitate withdrawals since June 26, 2023, leading to a crisis among its members [10][11]. - Despite the turmoil, some members remain hopeful for a recovery, with plans to potentially shift operations to Hong Kong, where a new company has been registered [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the collapse of the digital financial platform "DGCX Xin Kang Jia," which promised a daily return of 1% but ultimately left investors unable to withdraw their funds, highlighting the deceptive practices and risks associated with such platforms [1][3][12]. Summary by Sections Platform Operations and Collapse - "DGCX Xin Kang Jia" operated under the guise of a virtual currency investment platform, claiming to connect with the Dubai Gold and Commodity Exchange (DGCX) and promising an annualized return of 365%, significantly higher than traditional bank products [12][14]. - Despite multiple warnings from regulatory bodies starting in January 2025, the platform continued to attract investments until its collapse in June 2025 [3][17]. Investor Experiences - Many investors, like a mother from Shanxi, were lured into investing without understanding the risks, often influenced by friends or family [4][21]. - Some early investors managed to withdraw their funds before the collapse, indicating a predatory structure where later investors were essentially funding the returns of earlier ones [5][15]. Deceptive Practices - The platform employed a multi-level marketing structure, incentivizing users to recruit new members, which is characteristic of Ponzi schemes [15][23]. - The platform's operations included misleading claims about the legitimacy of its USDT transactions, which were used to obscure the true nature of the investment and evade regulatory scrutiny [14][15]. Regulatory Warnings and Public Response - Regulatory agencies issued multiple warnings about the platform's illegal activities, but these did not deter the influx of investments, reflecting a general lack of due diligence among investors [17][20]. - The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the signs of fraudulent investment schemes, such as promises of high returns and reliance on recruitment for returns [21].

为进一步推进金融教育宣传常态化，积极承担消费者权益保护主体责任，帮助社会公众增强维护自身合法权益的意识和能力，5月至6月间，泰山保险多家分 公司积极组织开展线下金融教育宣传活动，推动金融知识惠及更多消费者。 天津分公司∣聚焦村镇老年群体金融教育 5月25日，天津综合业务一部团队联合宁河区苗庄镇镇政府和当地派出所，开展村镇老年人金融教育宣传活动。活动现场针对老年人易受骗的特点，重点讲 解了养老诈骗、非法代理骗局、高息非法集资等常见骗局的手段、特点，同时，发放宣传手册，帮助老年人巩固金融知识。活动现场参与群众超100人次， 发放宣传材料100余份，解答咨询50余例，切实解决老年人"信息滞后"难题。通过本次下沉服务，填补了偏远地区金融教育空白。 山西分公司∣金融护航爱心护考 高考期间，山西分公司及其各分支机构在考点附近设置爱心护考服务点，为考生和家长提供扇子、矿泉水等物资，设置休息区域，供家长休息等待，并利用 休息期间向家长发放宣传资料，主动普及金融知识。针对家长们关心的保险理赔、个人信息保护、金融诈骗等内容，进行了详细解答，结合案例，普及防范 金融诈骗技巧，有效帮助家长们了解保险知识，提高风险防范意识。此次活动将 ...

来源：环球网 此次在邛崃山系（成都区域）发现雅致杓兰居群，是物种分布记录的重大突破。此前雅致杓兰国内仅在 滇西北和藏南有记录，邛崃山发现将其分布区向东扩展了数百公里，表明该物种可能具有比已知更强的 环境适应性。同时，邛崃山作为横断山脉北端的重要山系，该物种的发现，也证明了邛崃山可能会成为 高山植物应对气候变化的"避难所"。雅致杓兰目前已被世界自然保护联盟（IUCN）物种红色名录收 录，其受威胁等级评定为"濒危"（EN）。在我国，它被列为国家二级重点保护野生植物，受到法律严 格保护。 那么该物种为何如此珍稀濒危？成都市保护地和野保中心相关负责人表示，杓兰属植物普遍面临生存危 机，绝大多数种类都处于受威胁状态。其中，杓兰种子细小且胚乳退化（种子自身储存的营养很少）， 在自然条件下几乎无法独立萌发，必须依赖与特定微生物的共生关系才能完成其生活史。 此外，雅致杓兰分布海拔狭窄，且需要腐殖质丰富的特定生境。这种狭窄的海拔范围使其对气候变化极 为敏感。因此，像邛崃山这样潜在的气候避难所对其长期生存至关重要。"2024年对同属濒危种福氏杓 兰的保护遗传学研究发现，该物种存在严重的遗传瓶颈事件，遗传多样性非常低，种群结构复杂 ...

意大利财政部长：如果发生加密货币危机，必须考虑传染风险。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company actively engages in public insurance education and awareness activities to enhance the image of the insurance industry and fulfill its social responsibilities, particularly during the "7.8 National Insurance Publicity Day" [1][2][8] Group 1: Public Engagement Activities - The company organized a series of events including a financial knowledge fair and a walking event, where they set up a "Financial Energy Station" to educate the public on topics such as claims guidance and fraud prevention [2] - Interactive games and quizzes were utilized to make learning about insurance enjoyable for citizens, promoting the concepts of love and responsibility in insurance [2] - The company performed a program titled "Three Sentences of Financial Knowledge" to entertain and educate the audience, receiving positive feedback from attendees [2] Group 2: Community Outreach - The company initiated the "Five Entering" campaign, where managers and volunteers visited community centers to disseminate insurance knowledge, focusing on the "three appropriateness" principle and warning against fraudulent practices [4] - Educational efforts included discussions on insurance contracts, rational investment, and financial crime prevention, aimed at enhancing consumer understanding and interaction [4] - The company also engaged with local businesses to promote fire safety and risk management, gathering insights on consumer needs and experiences [4] Group 3: Grassroots Financial Education - The company is committed to building a "grid-based" financial education system, conducting outreach activities that are closer to the community and addressing local needs [5] - Financial education teams visited rural markets to provide financial knowledge, assist with inquiries, and raise awareness about financial fraud risks [5] - The focus is on creating a more effective and impactful educational outreach that resonates with the community [5][6] Group 4: Future Commitment - The company plans to continue enhancing insurance literacy among the public, ensuring that more people understand and trust insurance services, thereby supporting their quality of life [8]

Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the trademark licensing of the well-known Chinese brand "Lianxianglou" continues, with both the trademark user and owner refusing to compromise [1][2]. Group 1: Trademark Dispute - Guangzhou Lianxianglou Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against two companies operating Lianxianglou restaurants, winning the case in the first instance, with the defendants fined 2 million yuan for false advertising claims [1][4]. - The trademark owner, Guangzhou Old Brand Investment Holding Co., Ltd., insists that the licensing nature of the Lianxianglou trademark is ordinary licensing, and they will handle the legal proceedings regarding the fine [1][2][3]. - The controversy over the licensing method dates back to 2006, when the ownership and licensing terms were not clearly defined, leading to ongoing disputes [4][6]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Court Rulings - The Beijing Haidian District Court ruled that the two defendant companies, Guangzhou Lianlou Catering Service Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Bailian Catering Service Co., Ltd., could use the Lianxianglou trademark under ordinary licensing but could not claim historical branding without proper authorization [7][8]. - The court found that the use of terms like "Chinese Time-honored Brand" and "Centennial Classic" by the defendants constituted false advertising, misleading consumers about their historical connection to the original Lianxianglou [7][8]. Group 3: Business Expansion and Performance - Lianxianglou has accelerated its market expansion, successfully opening 10 stores in five cities, including Guangzhou, Wuhan, and Xiamen, demonstrating significant national growth [3]. - The brand's food sales business has seen a remarkable year-on-year increase of 1100%, indicating strong market performance [3].

Group 1 - The article discusses the complexity of automotive chassis technology, focusing on the variable gear ratio steering (VGRS) system as a specific configuration within the chassis system [1] - VGRS allows for dynamic adjustment of the steering ratio based on vehicle speed and steering angle, optimizing driving experience for both low-speed maneuverability and high-speed stability [6][13] - Traditional fixed gear ratio steering systems (CGR) can lead to challenges in handling at different speeds, necessitating the development of VGRS to address these issues [4][6] Group 2 - VGRS can be implemented through mechanical adjustments to the gear shape or through electronic means, such as steer-by-wire technology [8] - Mechanically, VGRS adjusts the density of the steering rack teeth to change the steering ratio, but it lacks the ability to adapt to vehicle speed [9] - An example of an advanced VGRS structure includes a harmonic drive reducer that allows for steering ratio adjustments based on vehicle speed and stability control [11][13]

点击下方 卡片 ，关注" 自动驾驶之心 "公众号 戳我-> 领取 自动驾驶近15个 方向 学习 路线 自动驾驶规划控制已经不再单单是逻辑兜底的岗位了。现在端到端、VLA的量产趋势下，传统规划控制的 生存空间正在慢慢被蚕食。。。 不少同学也表示，现在面试更看重规则算法+端到端的结合，两者缺一不可。 以下是最近一位打算转行同学的提问，非常具有代表性： 我想转行到自动驾驶规划控制岗位，研究生期间做过粒子群的无人机航迹规划，工作之后做的内容比 较传统。工作三年后还想换到自动驾驶行业。我给自己留了3-4个月准备时间，我刷了运动规划的课 程，我把C++ pimer和leetcode刷一遍，除此之外，请各位已经在自动驾驶规划控制的前辈指教，我还 需要学习什么？重点准备什么？非常感谢！ 自动驾驶之心邀请到规划控制算法专家宁远老师回答这个问题： 这个同学的问题非常好，很有现实意义。在我日常工作中，规则的算法作为兜底仍然是十分重要的。但坦 白说，这些东西已经是从业人员的基础了，诸如横纵联合、横纵解耦这些决策规划框架，一些基础的规划 算法（基于搜索/采样基于运动学等等），这些都已经是基本的面试要求了，面试中如果被问到答不上来会 很 ...