登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：000571 证券简称：新大洲A 公告编号：临2025-051 新大洲控股股份有限公司关于蔡来寅纠纷案诉讼进展的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 "再审申请人（一审被告、二审上诉人）：新大洲控股股份有限公司 被申请人（一审原告、二审被上诉人）：蔡来寅 一审被告：深圳市尚衡冠通投资企业（有限合伙） 再审申请人新大洲控股股份有限公司因与被申请人蔡来寅及一审被告深圳市尚衡冠通投资企业(有限合 伙)、黑龙江恒阳牛业有限责任公司、陈阳友、刘瑞毅、徐鹏飞、讷河新恒阳生化制品有限公司、许树 茂民间借贷纠纷一案，不服广东省高级人民法院（2021）粤民终309号民事判决，向本院申请再审。本 院依法组成合议庭对本案进行了审查，现已审查终结。 一审被告：黑龙江恒阳牛业有限责任公司 一审被告：陈阳友 一审被告：刘瑞毅 一审被告：徐鹏飞 一审被告：讷河新恒阳生化制品有限公司 一审被告：许树茂 裁定如下： 1、本案由本院提审； 2、再审期间，中止原判决的执行。" 一、诉讼情况概述 新大洲控股股份有限公司（以下 ...

投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2012】31号 【C 国贸易所得 宏观金融数据日报 国贸期货研究院 宏观金融研究中心 郑雨婷 न्ह IE E 切 与 流 TSI 性 逆回购、中期借贷便利(MLF)、买断式逆回购等中短期流动性管理工 具,引导年中流动性维持合理充裕状态。 | 品种 | 收盘价 | 较前一日变动 (%) | 品种 | 收盘价 | 较前一日变 动(%) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 沪深300 | 3878 | 0.23 | IF当月 | 3852 | 0.2 | | 上证50 | 2692 | 0.05 | IH当月 | 2674 | 0.0 | | 中证500 | 5770 | 0.54 | IC当月 | 5724 | 0.6 | | 中证1000 | 6167 | 0.72 | IM当月 | 6102 | 0.8 | | IF成交量 | 69770 | -0.1 | IF持仓量 | 231414 | 0.9 | | IH成交量 | 38082 | 19.4 | IH持仓量 | 81351 | 3.2 | | IC成交量 | 64999 | ...

Frøya, Norway, 5 June 2025: Reference is made to the stock exchange announcement made by Kaldvík AS ("Kaldvík" or the "Company") earlier today (the "Announcement"), regarding the successful completion of a private placement (the "Private Placement") of new shares in the Company raising gross proceeds of approximately NOK 532 million, equal to approximately EUR 46.2 million. In connection with the Private Placement, the following transactions have been made by close associates of the Company's primary inside ...

Core Viewpoint - Rising borrowing costs are suppressing demand, leading to a potential stabilization of UK house prices despite a year-on-year increase of 3.5% in May [1] Group 1: Market Analysis - The CEO of ASK Partners, Daniel Austin, indicates that the increase in borrowing costs is starting to impact homebuyers, which may pressure price growth and lead to stability in the housing market [1] - The latest Nationwide house price index shows a 3.5% increase in house prices compared to the previous year, suggesting some resilience in the market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of emotional extortion disguised as financial agreements, emphasizing that such agreements lack legal validity when they violate public order and morals [4][5][6] Group 1: Legal Findings - The court determined that the agreement between the parties was not a legitimate loan but rather a conditional gift, as it was made under the pressure of a breakup [2][4] - The court ruled that there was no actual lending relationship, and thus the loan agreement lacked legal effect [2][3] - The court's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claims reinforces the principle that agreements violating public morals are invalid [4][6] Group 2: Social Implications - The case reflects a growing trend of individuals attempting to monetize emotional losses through legal agreements, which often leads to legal and ethical complications [5] - Emotional extortion tactics, such as threats of self-harm, reveal deeper psychological issues and the need for legal systems to address such behaviors [5][6] - The case serves as a reminder that legal documents must be grounded in genuine transactions to be enforceable, and that emotional disputes should not be commodified [5][6]

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) is maintaining a moderately loose monetary policy despite a net withdrawal of liquidity through reverse repos in May, indicating a stable approach to managing market liquidity [1][4]. Group 1: Reverse Repo Operations - In May, the PBOC conducted a total of 700 billion yuan in reverse repo operations, with 400 billion yuan for 3-month (91 days) and 300 billion yuan for 6-month (182 days) maturities [3]. - The net withdrawal of 200 billion yuan in reverse repos does not imply a tightening of market liquidity, as the PBOC has various channels for injecting liquidity, including Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF) and structural tools [1][4]. Group 2: MLF and Liquidity Management - The MLF has seen a net injection of 375 billion yuan in May, reflecting the PBOC's commitment to maintaining medium-term liquidity [1][4]. - The PBOC's reliance on MLF has increased since the introduction of fixed quantity, interest rate bidding, and multiple price auctions for MLF operations, which helps stabilize expectations for financial institutions [4]. Group 3: Government Bond Transactions - The PBOC has not conducted any government bond transactions since January, with expectations to resume operations in July or August, depending on market conditions [5][6]. - The resumption of government bond transactions is seen as urgent to enhance the PBOC's holdings of government debt and to support the establishment of a sovereign credit model for currency issuance [6].

央行：5月中期借贷便利余额为50320亿元人民币。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China reported that the balance of medium-term lending facilities (MLF) stood at 50,320 billion yuan as of May [1] Group 1 - The balance of MLF indicates the central bank's liquidity management strategy [1]

智通财经APP注意到，日本政府债券的需求将在周三面临考验，届时将进行上周拍卖引发全球市场紧张后的首次超长期债券发行。上周的20年期国债拍卖需 求创下十多年来最弱水平，导致收益率飙升至创纪录高点。 日本财务省此次40年期国债发行之际，美国等其他主要经济体的长期借贷成本也大幅上升。上周20年期国债拍卖后，日本的超长期债券变得更加不稳定，这 也给40年期和30年期债券带来压力，其收益率跃升至发行以来的最高水平。 随着日本央行缩减债券购买规模，而寿险公司未能填补这一缺口，日本债券收益率(尤其是超长期债券)一直在上升。本周债券跌幅有所收窄，但市场担心如 果40年期债券拍卖未能吸引买家，收益率可能再次上升。 日本四大寿险公司报告称，最新财年其国内债券持仓的未实现亏损合计约600亿美元。日本央行行长植田和男尚未表示准备在债券市场采取行动。 另一家日本寿险公司太阳生命保险计划增持国内债券，但表示可能需要推迟部分投资。 太阳生命保险投资规划部总经理佐藤义隆表示："收益率已达到我们希望投资的水平，但流动性较低且价格波动太大，因此我们不得不考虑投资时机。" 一些市场参与者希望，40年期债券拍卖的强劲结果可能会阻止近期收益率的上升。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of diverse personal loan services has provided consumers with convenience for purchasing durable goods, but there are concerns regarding transparency in fees, high borrowing costs, and personal information security [1] Group 1: Marketing Practices and Consumer Awareness - Some loan advertisements may contain misleading phrases such as "interest-free," "low interest," and "high limits," which can obscure actual interest costs and lead consumers to over-borrow [2] - Financial institutions and online lending partners are urged to standardize marketing practices and comply with national regulations on online marketing [2] - Consumers are advised to carefully read loan contracts and understand key information such as loan terms, fees, and potential costs associated with defaults [2] Group 2: Identifying Fraudulent Loan Intermediaries - Fraudulent loan intermediaries may impersonate banks and use deceptive tactics to lure consumers with promises of "no collateral" and "low rates," posing risks of high fees and personal information breaches [3] - Consumers should only consult or apply for loans through legitimate financial institutions and verify the credentials of intermediaries [3] - Regulatory bodies have indicated that many banks do not collaborate with intermediaries and do not charge intermediary fees for loan processing [3] Group 3: Risks of Debt Restructuring and Optimization - Some consumers may fall into traps of "debt restructuring" or "debt optimization" schemes promoted by illegal intermediaries, which can lead to high fees and potential legal consequences [4] - The financial regulatory authority has issued warnings about the risks associated with these schemes, advising consumers to remain vigilant [4] Group 4: Consumer Protection and Financial Management - Consumers should be cautious of false advertising and the risks associated with illegal lending practices, and they should evaluate their financial situation before taking on loans [4] - It is important for consumers to protect their personal information and avoid sharing sensitive data with unverified parties [4] - Consumers are encouraged to choose financial products that align with their risk tolerance and financial capabilities, considering the costs and repayment abilities [4]