RT Apollo (@MindsFiction)“satoshi was a cypherpunkcypherpunks use cryptography and code to build systems of freedomfreedom from state overreach, freedom of speech, and the right to transact”Infinite bid, hero ...

Core Principles - Privacy is essential for an open society, enabling selective self-revelation rather than secrecy [1] - Freedom of speech is paramount, even when it involves sharing memories of interactions [2] - Individuals should only reveal information directly necessary for a transaction to maintain privacy [3] - Anonymous transaction systems, like cash, are crucial for privacy, empowering individuals to reveal their identity only when desired [4] - Cryptography is necessary for privacy, ensuring that communication is only accessible to the intended recipients [5] Technological Imperatives - Anonymous systems should be built to facilitate private transactions, leveraging electronic technologies [7] - Cypherpunks are dedicated to creating anonymous systems using cryptography, anonymous mail forwarding, digital signatures, and electronic money [8] - Code is being written and published to defend privacy, making it freely available worldwide [9] - Regulations on cryptography are opposed, as encryption is considered a fundamentally private act [10] Social and Political Considerations - Privacy requires a social contract and cooperation among individuals to deploy privacy-enhancing systems [11] - Governments and corporations cannot be relied upon to grant privacy; individuals must actively defend it [6] - The Cypherpunks welcome questions and concerns but remain steadfast in their mission to enhance privacy on networks [12]

it is both hilarious and infuriating that tourists think privacy is a "meta"hint: the cryptography part of the word "crypto" is why this industry exists in the first placethere is nothing more fundamental to crypto than using encryption for freedommany will be sidelined ...

Core Idea - The Cypherpunks' vision of individual freedom through code and cryptography is being realized [1] - Encrypted, unruggable money represents the final step in achieving this freedom [1] Technological Implementation - The initial focus was on encrypting text and data on the internet [1]

you physically can not get more PvE than privacyindividuals > institutionscryptography > corruptionzillions > trillions ...

like mfer what do you think the literal crypto in "crypto" stands for?what exactly do you think the word cypherpunk even means?do you understand that the entire point of the movement was privacy?individual rights gained via cryptography?this is as lindy as it gets ...

RT lucid.⛩️ (@lucidzk)this is what happens when a technology is built on first principles. privacy, freedom, individual sovereignty and not made up hype cycles.capital markets make the rest obvious: why wouldn’t you accumulate the asset of a system that literally enforces freedom cryptographically!? ...

Core Insights - Google has achieved a significant milestone in quantum computing, which is expected to drastically reduce the time required for certain computational tasks from thousands of years to a much shorter duration [1] Group 1: Company Developments - The announcement of the quantum computing breakthrough positions Google as a leader in the tech industry, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape [1] - This advancement may lead to new applications and innovations across various sectors, including finance, healthcare, and logistics [1] Group 2: Industry Impact - The development is likely to send shockwaves through the technology stack, prompting other companies to accelerate their own quantum computing initiatives [1] - The implications of this technology could redefine computational capabilities, influencing how industries approach complex problem-solving [1]

Could BTE be the cryptographic key to ending frontrunning forever?Deep dive below.https://t.co/Erhhy1mM5b ...

Bitcoin Security Vulnerabilities - The report identifies Bitcoin's core vulnerability not in the protocol itself, but in the concentration of control among a small group of publicly identified core maintainers [1] - The maintainers' known sponsors and location within three-letter agency jurisdictions raise concerns [1] - The report draws a parallel to Project Veritas, highlighting the speed at which an organization can be compromised [2] Codebase Complexity and Review Process - Bitcoin's codebase, consisting of 300,000-400,000 lines of C++, requires expertise in 8+ disciplines for proper review [2] - Individual maintainers review code based on their strengths, trusting others in different areas, which may lead to oversight [2] - The codebase's complexity exceeds human cognitive capacity, making it impossible for any single reviewer to trace all execution paths and spot edge cases [3] - A single consensus change can affect 15+ subsystems across 50,000 lines of interdependent code [3] Proposed Solutions - Radical codebase simplification is necessary to improve security [4] - Multiple competing implementations of Bitcoin should be encouraged [4] - Broader geographic and jurisdictional diversity among contributors is needed [4] - Anonymous contributors should be allowed where possible [4] Shifting Security Assumptions - Bitcoin's security model assumes adversarial nodes, but the report suggests the need to update this assumption to account for potentially adversarial maintainers [5] - Sovereign node operation is recommended [5]