🚨 NOW: Hyperliquid leads all chains in fees over the last 24 hours, followed by edgeX and Tron. https://t.co/mVM9HOK3oB ...

🚨 LATEST: ‘Cut-throat’ battle for crypto ETNs erupts in the UK as issuers slash fees to record lows after the retail ban is lifted. https://t.co/EA3ZUSSTnC ...

RT OAK Research (@OAK_Res_EN)🟣 Here’s why Euler’s revenues are set to soar in Q4 2025 — @eulerfinanceRecent months have proven Euler’s profitability, and the trajectory ahead looks even stronger.A major governance proposal was adopted in september, redefining the protocol’s entire economic model.👉 EIP-65: “Activate fees on Euler Lending”Until now, Euler Prime and Euler Yield’s main markets (USDC, USDT, wETH) were exempt from fees to attract liquidity and boost TVL.Objective Labs proposed introducing a 10% f ...

Wait... 0 Fees on $BTC, $ETH, $SOL and $BNB? https://t.co/Ehqu0Nh3cI ...

ICYMI: @Uniswap has generated more fees than @HyperliquidX during October; $96.6m vs. $88.0m. https://t.co/9WKqrBu2Cl ...

How we calculate "Fees" for @HyperliquidX 👇Token Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal):Traditional “one-sentence” methodologies gloss over this technical and economic complexity, limiting their value for serious analysis.Without transparency into these steps, investors cannot fully audit or benchmark the resulting metrics. https://t.co/6eevsXEoR5 ...

Financial Performance - Meteora generated over $13 billion in fees since inception [2] - Over $12 billion (approximately 923%) of the fees generated by Meteora went directly back to users [2] - In the last 12 months Meteora generated more than $11 billion USD in fees [1] - The vast majority (>$1 billion USD) of the fees generated in the last 12 months went back to users [1] User Incentives - Users can potentially earn significant returns by using Meteora and participating in liquidity pools [1] - Meteora is returning fees back into the hands of its users [2] Protocol Comparison - The biggest protocols in crypto generate over $1 billion in fees each [1]

Proposal Overview - BIP-X proposes discounting normal transactions without increasing block size [1] - The proposal utilizes median fees and constrained data [1] Technical Details - The proposal involves bucket sizes, further details available via the provided link [1]

Market Dominance - Hyperliquid leads top chains in fee generation, exceeding $20 million [1] - Hyperliquid's fee generation significantly surpasses that of BNB Chain and Ethereum [1]

Transaction Handling - Solana's "failed" transactions are analogous to reverted transactions on EVM, primarily due to arbitrage traders manually reverting unprofitable trades [1] - These transactions, though "failed", still land on the blockchain and incur fees [1] Scalability and Fees - Solana has consistently handled thousands of transactions per second (TPS), exceeding 6,000 TPS without votes on multiple occasions [1] - Solana maintains low fees to ensure affordability for users accessing unrelated blockspace, such as USDC transfers [1] - Solana exhibits the most consistent fee volatility, with median fees staying 10x below networks handling 10x less scale [1] TPS Comparison - Combining TPS from chains posting data to Solana is not equivalent to Solana's L1 TPS [1] Overall Assessment - Solana is considered a highly scalable, usable, and battle-tested system for serious finance at a global scale [1]