Group 1: Capital Increase Announcement - The company approved a capital increase of 466 million yuan for five wholly-owned subsidiaries to support operational development [1] - The subsidiaries involved are Yunnan Jianzhijia Medical Service Co., Yunnan Jianzhijia Chongqing Qinkang Pharmaceutical Co., Liaoning Jianzhijia Pharmaceutical Co., Hebei Tangren Pharmaceutical Co., and Hebei Jianzhijia Tangren Chain Pharmacy Co. [1] - The capital increase will be completed within one year after the board's approval [1] Group 2: Guarantee for Subsidiary - The company provided a guarantee of 20 million yuan for its wholly-owned subsidiary, Yunnan Jianzhijia Chain Health Pharmacy Co. [4] - As of the announcement date, the total guarantees provided by the company for the subsidiary amounted to 531.57 million yuan [4] - The company has no overdue external guarantees, and all guarantees are for wholly-owned subsidiaries [4][10] Group 3: Guarantee Details - The company signed a maximum guarantee contract with Fudian Bank for a credit limit of 20 million yuan for the subsidiary [5] - The total credit limit for the company and its subsidiaries is capped at 8 billion yuan, with specific allocations for operational and project financing [6][7] - The guarantees are intended to support the subsidiary's operational development and improve overall financing efficiency [9]

证券简称：苏豪弘业 证券代码：600128 公告编号：临2025-027 苏豪弘业股份有限公司 关于为控股子公司提供担保的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 被担保人名称：江苏弘业国际技术工程有限公司（以下简称"技术工程"）。 ● 是否为上市公司关联人：否 ● 本次担保金额及已实际为其提供的担保余额：本次为技术工程最高担保金额为3,300万元；截至公告 披露日，已实际为其提供的担保总额为17,300万元（含本次）。 ● 本次担保是否有反担保：其他股东以其所持该公司股权和收益提供反担保。 ● 对外担保逾期的累计数量：无逾期担保。 其中为江苏弘业国际技术工程有限公司（以下简称"技术工程"）提供担保的额度不超过17,500万元。 有关上述担保的详情参见公司于2025年4月29日及2025年5月29日在《中国证券报》《上海证券报》及上 海证券交易所网站 （http://www.sse.com.cn）披露的"《苏豪弘业第十届董事会第三十七次会议决议公 告》（临2025-012）""《苏豪弘业关于 ...

Group 1 - The company held the 15th meeting of the 10th Supervisory Board on June 13, 2025, with all three supervisors participating in the voting, which complied with relevant regulations [2][4] - The Supervisory Board approved the financial write-off of asset losses, with a total original value of inventory and fixed assets amounting to 1,789,961.56 yuan and an estimated loss of 978,888.18 yuan, impacting the total profit for 2024 by 825,135.58 yuan [3][4] - The financial write-off will not affect the company's profit and loss for the year 2025, as the impact has already been accounted for in previous years [3] Group 2 - The company announced the proposed cancellation of its subsidiary, Guangxi Wuzhou Zhongheng Pharmaceutical (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., during the 29th meeting of the 10th Board of Directors held on June 13, 2025 [7][12] - The reason for the cancellation is that the subsidiary has not engaged in substantial operations since its establishment, and the company aims to optimize its organizational structure and improve operational efficiency [8] - The cancellation will not involve personnel arrangements and is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's financial and operational status [9] Group 3 - The Board of Directors approved the establishment of the "Overseas Investment Management Measures" and the "Financing Guarantee Management Measures," as well as the revision of the "Financing Management System" [13][15][16] - All resolutions passed with unanimous support from the board members, indicating strong consensus on these governance measures [14][15]

证券代码：603386 证券简称：骏亚科技 公告编号：2025-023 广东骏亚电子科技股份有限公司 关于为下属全资子公司提供担保的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 被担保人名称及是否为上市公司关联人：惠州市骏亚精密电路有限公司（以下简称"惠州骏亚精 密"）、惠州市骏亚数字技术有限公司（以下简称"惠州骏亚数字"），被担保人为广东骏亚电子科技股 份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）全资子公司。 ● 本次担保金额及已实际提供的担保余额：公司本次为惠州骏亚精密、惠州骏亚数字银行融资提供担 保，担保的最高本金限额合计为人民币8,000万元；截至2025年6月14日，公司为惠州骏亚精密、惠州骏 亚数字已实际提供的担保余额分别为9,060.50万元、3,280.00万元。 ● 本次担保是否有反担保：无。 ● 对外担保逾期的累计数量：无。 ● 本次提供担保事项已经公司2024年年度股东会审议通过，无需再次提交股东会审议。 一、担保情况概述 （一）担保情况概述 近日，公司与兴业银行股份有限公司惠州分行（以 ...

Core Viewpoint - Gree Titanium New Energy Co., Ltd. has faced a judicial freeze on its 100% stake in Zhuhai Guangtong Automobile Co., Ltd. due to historical issues related to its former actual controller, Wei Yincang, who misused the company seal for unauthorized guarantees in December 2015 [1][2]. Group 1: Company Background - Gree Titanium New Energy was formerly known as Yinlong New Energy Co., Ltd., founded by Wei Yincang in 2009, focusing on lithium titanate battery technology, new energy vehicle manufacturing, and energy storage systems [2]. - Gree Electric Appliances acquired a 30.47% stake in Gree Titanium New Energy in 2021 and increased its stake to 55.01% by the end of 2023, holding 72.47% of voting rights [2]. Group 2: Judicial Freeze Details - The judicial freeze on Gree Titanium New Energy's stake in Guangtong Automobile is linked to Wei Yincang's unauthorized actions, which were not approved by the board of directors as per company regulations [2]. - The company plans to actively negotiate with the court and initiate legal proceedings to hold relevant parties accountable [2]. Group 3: Business Operations - Gree Titanium New Energy asserts that its business operations remain normal and that the equity freeze will not significantly impact its production and operations [3]. - The company has improved operational efficiency by adjusting production lines and optimizing order structures, with its new energy vehicles operating in over 240 cities nationwide [3].

Meeting Overview - The company will hold its second extraordinary general meeting of shareholders on July 2, 2025, at 14:30 [1] - The meeting will include both on-site and online voting options for shareholders [1][5] - Shareholders must register to attend the meeting, with specific requirements for both corporate and individual shareholders [4][5] Agenda Items - The meeting will review several proposals, including amendments to various management systems and the approval of a project loan application by a wholly-owned subsidiary [2][3] - Proposals require a special resolution, needing more than two-thirds of the voting rights held by attending shareholders to pass [3] Registration and Voting Procedures - Registration for the meeting can be done in person or through mail, fax, or email for remote shareholders [4][5] - The company will provide a platform for online voting through the Shenzhen Stock Exchange systems [5][10] - Detailed instructions for the voting process, including the allocation of voting rights, are provided [10][11]

Core Points - The company held its fourth (temporary) meeting of the sixth supervisory board, chaired by Mr. Huang Liang, in compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1] - The supervisory board approved the proposal to amend the company's articles of association, aligning with the latest legal requirements and actual business conditions [1] - The board also approved a proposal for the wholly-owned subsidiary, Nantong Yaben, to apply for a bank project loan, with the company providing a joint liability guarantee [1] Summary by Sections - **Meeting Details** - The meeting was convened and conducted in accordance with the Company Law and the company's articles of association [1] - Voting was conducted by a show of hands, with all three supervisors in favor of the proposals [2] - **Amendment of Articles of Association** - The supervisory board agreed to revise the articles of association based on the latest regulations and the company's operational situation [1] - The proposal will be submitted for approval at the company's shareholders' meeting [2] - **Loan Guarantee Proposal** - The supervisory board approved the company providing a guarantee for a bank loan application by its wholly-owned subsidiary [1] - The actual guarantee amount and terms will be determined through further negotiations with the bank [1]

2025.06. 16 微信编辑 | 夏木 推荐阅读 工信部严查车企"说一套做一套" 本文字数：212，阅读时长大约1分钟 作者 | 第一财经 王珍 格力电器控股的格力钛新能源股份有限公司6月16日在官微发布声明称，近日其所持珠海广通汽车有 限公司100%股权被法院冻结。这源于格力钛的前身银隆新能源的原实控人、法定代表人魏银仓，未 经公司董事会批准，在2015年12月盗用公司公章在其与阳光人寿的增资补充协议上盖章违规担保而 引起。格力钛将追究相关人员法律责任。当前，格力钛运营正常。 ...

2025.06. 16 公告信息显示，在甘肃矿区人民法院正在审理的一起贷款担保纠纷中，贵州长征作为担保人，为一笔 本息合计超过2.7亿元的贷款提供了担保，从而被债权人起诉，要求承担连带责任。 从这笔看似平常的上市公司转让下属公司股权的交易切入，第一财经记者调查发现了一些不寻常的隐 秘事项：2018年，上市公司华明装备以近4亿元的代价从曾经在A股市场翻云覆雨的银河系潘琦手中 收购贵州长征，却在六年后不得不以100万元剥离。高买低卖的交易背后，意外牵出了兰州银行 作者 | 第一财 经 张丽华、魏中原 然而，兰州银行向关联公司兰州三维汇成置业有限公司（下称："三维汇成"）转让上述贷款对应的 债权，之后发生的偿债官司在诉讼调查中暴露的关联交易疑点，将金融机构放贷合规性与资本系族利 益勾连的监管灰色地带推向聚光灯下。 2025年4月16日，华明装备（002270.SZ）披露，计划以100万元的价格，转让全资孙公司贵州长 征电气有限公司（下称："贵州长征"）100% 的股权。而就在六年前，该公司收购贵州长征的价 格，高达3.98亿元。 100 万股权转让牵出巨额担保案 贵州长征突然被债权人起诉追偿债务，是华明装备转让股权 ...

Core Viewpoint - Huaming Equipment plans to divest its wholly-owned subsidiary Guizhou Changzheng Electric Co., Ltd. for 1 million yuan, a significant drop from the 398 million yuan paid six years ago, due to a lawsuit from creditors seeking debt recovery [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions and Financial Implications - The divestment is a response to Guizhou Changzheng being sued by creditors for over 270 million yuan in loans for which it acted as a guarantor [2][4]. - Huaming Equipment stated that the guarantee obligations were not disclosed by the previous owners, leading to potential financial risks and uncertainties [4][5]. - The company aims to optimize its asset structure and mitigate legal risks by transferring the subsidiary [4][5]. Group 2: Debt and Guarantee Issues - The loans in question were issued by Lanzhou Bank, with Guizhou Changzheng providing guarantees for multiple loans totaling 11 billion yuan to three trade companies with minimal capital [2][6][14]. - The loans were linked to a broader scheme involving multiple companies and individuals, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the transactions and the financial health of the guarantors [8][19]. - The three borrowing companies had a combined registered capital of less than 60 million yuan, yet secured substantial loans, indicating potential irregularities in the lending process [14][23]. Group 3: Connections and Regulatory Concerns - The investigation revealed connections between the borrowing companies and the controlling entities of the guarantors, suggesting a network of interests that may have influenced the loan approvals [8][21]. - The guarantors included companies and individuals with a history of financial difficulties and regulatory issues, raising questions about the due diligence performed by Lanzhou Bank [23][28]. - The lack of transparency and compliance with regulatory requirements in the guarantee agreements has been highlighted, with significant implications for corporate governance and accountability [26][27].