Censorship & Disinformation - The National Academy of Sciences is heavily involved in censorship, producing a significant amount of "disinformation studies" [1] - These studies are allegedly targeted at Trump supporters and policy critics [1] - The National Academy of Sciences' politicization is highlighted [1] - No government agency requested the NAS to weigh in on the matter [1] Political Agenda - A report by the National Academies is described as "rigged" to thwart Trump's energy agenda [1]

From @WSJopinion: Conservatives were incensed by Joe Biden’s censorship, and they were right to be. Nothing has changed to justify it now, writes @KimStrassel. https://t.co/HcLDxDiXxU ...

Top Republicans also are not defending everything Trump is doing as it's all cast in the open this week. A Republican senator warning the censorship effort should make everyone careful about any lines we cross and diminishing free speech while none other than Ted Cruz rebuking Trump's efforts to try to control or decide your free speech. I think it is unbelievably dangerous for government to put itself in the position of saying we're going to decide what speech we like and what we don't if the government ge ...

Free Speech & Censorship - The report highlights concerns about potential government overreach and censorship, specifically focusing on the alleged pressure from the FCC on ABC to suspend Jimmy Kimmel [1][2][6][7][11] - The core issue revolves around whether the government is unlawfully coercing private companies to suppress free speech, which is a potential violation of the First Amendment [6][7][10] - The New York Times' successful defense against a lawsuit from Donald Trump, based on First Amendment protections, is presented as a contrasting example of standing up to perceived censorship [2][3][4][24] - The report emphasizes the unanimous (9-0) Supreme Court precedent against government coercion of private entities to suppress speech [8][9][10][11] Company Response & Industry Implications - ABC and Disney's initial decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel is portrayed as "giving in" or "rushing to surrender" to government pressure, unlike the New York Times [13][20][21][24] - Disney CEO Bob Iger's leadership is under scrutiny, with concerns that he is "co-signing" government censorship instead of defending his talent and the First Amendment [22][23][24] - The report mentions potential consumer backlash, including calls for boycotts of Disney products and services [19][20] - The media industry is urged to consider the long-term implications of complying with perceived government censorship, potentially leading down a dangerous path [17][19] Political & Legal Context - Donald Trump's actions are characterized as mirroring "authoritarian approaches to silencing dissent" [14] - The report notes that even some Republicans are wary of censorship efforts [4][5] - The report suggests that the current situation presents a test of American freedom and the willingness of companies to uphold the First Amendment [25][26][27]

Freedom of Speech and Censorship - The discussion revolves around freedom of speech, censorship, and potential government overreach in media [1][2][3] - Concerns are raised about whether recent actions against media figures constitute cultural censorship or state pressure [2][21] - The industry acknowledges a distinction between cultural censorship and governmental censorship, with the latter posing a greater threat to free press [2][3][21] - Some argue that freedom of speech is under attack more than ever, drawing parallels to situations in countries with stricter censorship laws [1] Political and Corporate Influence - The industry notes that corporate pressures and decisions, rather than solely governmental actions, play a significant role in sidelining media figures [1] - The influence of political figures and voters on media content and decisions is also considered [1] - The potential for the FCC to investigate whether certain programs qualify as bonafide news is discussed, raising concerns about regulatory overreach [15][16][17] Historical Context and Future Implications - Historical parallels are drawn to the Nixon era and attempts to control the media, highlighting concerns about potential abuses of power [10][11] - The vulnerability of broadcast networks due to declining viewership and financial structures is emphasized [18][19] - The industry expresses concern about a chilling effect on media and the erosion of free speech, potentially leading to self-censorship [18][20][14]

From @WSJopinion: Conservatives were incensed by Joe Biden’s censorship, and they were right to be. Nothing has changed to justify it now, writes @KimStrassel. https://t.co/iE1INsO5Xo ...

Joining us now, staff writer at The Atlantic, Adam Seer, Atlantic staff writer and MSNBC political analyst Ashley Parker, MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin, and NBC News entertainment correspondent Khloe Melas. All right, Lisa, first I want to get the legalities uh straight here because these are private companies. They are allowed to fire somebody for what they say. That's fine. The difference here is the FCC getting involved and and the term is jaw boning. If they continue to jawbone the local stations ...

In the wake of Jimmy Kimmel's suspension, Democrats have put on a united front, launching investigations, filing motions to subpoena the FCC chair, and demanding calls for his resignation. And joining us now, Democratic Senator of Connecticut, Chris Murphy. He is part of a group of congressional Democrats that unveiled the No Political Enemies Act, legislation they say will help protect speech targeted by Trump.Senator, welcome. So glad you're here to talk about this. Beyond Kimmel, we heard the president t ...

Freedom of Speech Concerns - The report highlights concerns about potential censorship and attacks on freedom of speech, suggesting it's under more threat than ever before [2][7] - The report mentions influential conservative voices speaking out against the erosion of the First Amendment [3] - The report expresses concern that Charlie Kirk's death might be exploited to introduce hate speech laws, potentially justifying civil disobedience [6] Political Influence and Bullying - The report suggests potential pressure from Trump and the FCC on Disney, leading to capitulation and fear [1] - The report implies that Trump and the extreme right might bully those they dislike [2] - The report references a broken promise from Trump regarding ending government censorship [2] Reactions and Perspectives - The report notes condemnation of actions against Kimmel from figures like Tim Dylan and Andrew Schultz [1] - The report mentions differing perspectives on the MAGA movement from figures like Tucker Carlson and Mike Pence, with Pence expressing concern about a larger crackdown [4] - The report emphasizes the importance of civility in public discourse [5]

This is a story about government censorship. Right now, it's about Donald Trump's right-wing MAGA government censorship. If he gets away with it, it could break truly very long precedents and be used or abused by others.But right now, it's MAGA censorship first and foremost. It's now immediately become a scandal for Trump's communications official, Brendan Carr. He's facing calls to investigate what he did here and some calls on the left for his resignation.Others are speaking out against the First Amendmen ...