□ 左 鲤 一位花丝镶嵌艺术大师曾公开表示，随着现代工艺的不断升级，一些所谓的花丝镶嵌首饰仅凭肉眼都不 能分辨出是否为古法技艺，必须要经过火烧才能分辨工艺属性，因为纯手工制作的花丝作品在焊接时需 要使用焊药，作品经过火烧后会分解成一个个零部件，而现代工艺品是一体成型，加热后只会熔化，不 能分解成零件。 古法技艺作为中华优秀传统文化的重要组成部分，其蕴含的历史价值和文化价值一直备受关注。然而， 当这种社会关注逐渐转变成为一种高品质消费需求的时候，一些商家就容易在经济利益的驱使下，将文 化变成营销的幌子。 笔者认为，此种做法势必会削减传统技艺的珍贵属性，更容易让消费者对传统技艺产生误解和不信任。 当然，笔者需要强调的是，古法技艺和现代工艺两者之间并无直接冲突，也不应以工艺的不同武断地进 行比较。但是，商家打着弘扬古法技艺的幌子，将批量生产的现代工艺品包装成具有稀缺性的高端艺术 品的行为，就涉嫌以误导消费者的方式进行消费欺诈，不仅深深伤害了广大消费者的文化情感，更直接 影响了古法技艺的传承发展。 针对此类现象，笔者希望短视频运营平台应主动承担起主体责任，不仅要对入驻平台的商家、主播进行 严格的资质审查，还应充分利用 ...

Core Viewpoint - GeneDx Holdings Corp. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws and unlawful business practices, following allegations of widespread fraud and revenue inflation tactics [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Investigations - Grizzly Research published a report claiming that GeneDx's growth is largely an illusion, driven by fraudulent schemes aimed at exploiting Medicaid and Medicare systems to inflate revenue [2]. - The report alleges that GeneDx has engaged in "code stacking," allowing the company to bill insurance providers for services that do not meet required criteria [2]. - Testimonies from former employees and ongoing litigation suggest that the company's executives, including CEO Katherine Stueland and CFO Kevin Feeley, have sold shares immediately upon vesting, indicating potential insider knowledge of imminent risks [2]. Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the release of the Grizzly report, GeneDx's stock price fell by $4.84 per share, or 6.72%, closing at $67.18 per share on February 5, 2025 [2]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is representing GeneDx stockholders in the investigation and is seeking information from those who have suffered losses or have relevant information regarding the claims [1][3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing trend of consumer fraud targeting the elderly, characterized by professional and systematic tactics employed by illegal businesses to manipulate and deceive older consumers [1][2]. Group 1: Fraudulent Practices - Illegal businesses are using high-priced health devices and "bee glue" health products to mislead elderly consumers through false advertising [1]. - The fraudulent tactics include creating a facade of legitimate operations by renting formal storefronts and attracting potential customers through community promotions and "health seminars" [1][2]. - The two identified cases exhibit a complete industrial chain of "front-end experience attraction - mid-end brainwashing marketing - back-end high-priced sales" [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures - The West Lake District Market Supervision Bureau is actively exploring and improving regulatory measures to protect elderly consumers, including conducting thorough inspections and special actions like "Protecting the Elderly and Cleaning the Source" [2][3]. - The bureau is simplifying evidence recognition processes for complaints related to elderly consumer fraud to ensure timely and efficient law enforcement responses [3]. - There is a call for family members to pay more attention to their elderly relatives' consumption patterns to help them avoid falling into "emotional marketing" traps [3].

Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of online consumption has raised higher demands for improving consumption models, enhancing consumption efficiency, and protecting consumer rights [2] Group 1: Online Consumption and Consumer Rights - Online shopping has become a significant way for consumers, emphasizing the need for trust and comfort in transactions [2] - The Supreme People's Court has released typical civil cases related to online consumption to address new issues and respond to public concerns [2] Group 2: Case Study on Live Streaming Marketing - A case involved a seller who misrepresented the material of a bracelet during a live stream, leading to a court ruling that the seller must honor a "fake compensation ten times" promise, resulting in a compensation of 10,000 yuan [3][4] - The ruling highlights the importance of accountability in live streaming marketing, where consumer trust is heavily influenced by the host's claims [4] Group 3: Ticket Purchase and Refund Policies - A case regarding concert ticket refunds revealed ambiguities in refund rules, where a consumer was partially refunded despite the platform's unclear terms [6][7] - The court ruled in favor of the consumer, emphasizing that ambiguous terms should be interpreted in a way that protects consumer rights [6][7] Group 4: Return Policies for Online Purchases - A case involving a handbag purchase showed that a seller's refusal to accept a return based on unclear terms was deemed invalid, leading to a full refund for the consumer [8][9] - The ruling reinforced the seven-day no-reason return policy, ensuring consumers can make purchases with confidence [9]

Core Viewpoint - Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is facing a class action securities lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud related to the safety and clinical trial protocol of its RP-A501 treatment, which resulted in a significant stock price decline after the FDA placed a clinical hold on the study [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit aims to recover losses for investors affected by alleged securities fraud between February 27, 2025, and May 26, 2025 [1]. - Defendants allegedly made positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about RP-A501's safety, including the risk of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [2]. - Following the announcement of a clinical hold by the FDA due to a SAE, Rocket's stock price plummeted from $6.27 per share on May 23, 2025, to $2.33 per share on May 27, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 37% in one trading day [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the relevant timeframe have until August 11, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

NEW YORK, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Fortrea Holdings Inc. ("Fortrea Holdings Inc." or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FTRE) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Fortrea Holdings Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between July 3, 2023 and February 28, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: https://zlk.com/psl ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Ibotta, Inc. due to alleged securities fraud related to its initial public offering on April 18, 2024 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit aims to recover losses for investors who purchased Ibotta securities and were negatively impacted by the alleged fraud [2]. - The complaint alleges that Ibotta failed to disclose the risks associated with its contract with The Kroger Co., specifically that the contract was at-will, allowing Kroger to terminate it without notice [3]. - Ibotta provided detailed information about its contract with Walmart but did not mention the at-will nature of the Kroger contract, misleading investors about the stability of its client relationships [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in Ibotta have until June 16, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [4]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require any out-of-pocket costs for class members, and they may be entitled to compensation [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [5]. - The firm has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [5].

NEW YORK, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Compass Diversified Holdings and Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC (NYSE: CODI) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Compass you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting https://www.bfalaw.com/cases-investigations/compass-diversified-holdings. Investors ...

Serasa Experian同期发布的《2025年身份与欺诈报告》也显示，信用卡诈骗为最常见的欺诈形式， 53.8%的巴西受访者表示自己或亲友曾遭遇此类情况。此外，27.5%的受访者认为该类型欺诈是他们最 担心的网络安全威胁。 报告显示，除银行与信用卡，其他高风险领域还包括服务业、金融机构、通信业和零售业，欺诈尝试分 别为31.9%、6.7%、5.7%和1.7%，反映出目前巴西金融及周边服务业面临的广泛欺诈风险。 据估算，若上述欺诈企图全部得手，将对巴西金融体系造成超过157亿雷亚尔（约合人民币204亿元）的 潜在经济损失。数据显示，银行与信用卡领域占巴西全国所有欺诈尝试的54%。 （文章来源：新华财经） "银行和信用卡行业依然是巴西数字欺诈的'震中'，且网络犯罪分子的诈骗手段日趋复杂。"Serasa Experian身份验证与欺诈防控部门负责人卡约·罗查（Caio Rocha）表示，"要有效保护数以百万计的金融 交易，就必须持续投入实时行为识别技术，从而降低风险、减少损失、增强公众对金融体系的信任。" 成立于1968年的Serasa是巴西的信用和数据分析机构，2007年被全球数据服务公司Experian集 ...

NEW YORK, June 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Open Lending Corporation ("Open Lending Corporation" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: LPRO) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Open Lending Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: https:// ...