We begin with a study in contrast. Here are presidents George W. Bush and President Barack Obama when confronted by public opposition to their policies. >> Democracy is a beautiful thing and that people are allowed to express their opinion. I welcome people's uh right to say what they believe. >> I've listened to you. I heard you. I heard you. I heard you. All right. Now, I've been respectful. I let you college. All right. So, so let me just let me No, nobody's removing you. I've heard you. But you've got t ...

So, I am here in Houston, Texas. Uh, behind me, we're seeing the start of the day's nose day programming. We have a couple thousand people.You may not be able to fully see them, but they're going to be walking up the street, up Walker Street to city hall, where they expect upwards of 15,000 people to again gather uh in today's No Kings Day protest. Now, several people I've spoken to say this demonstration a direct response to what they feel is an infringement on their constitutional rights by the Trump admi ...

Political Influence & Potential Abuse of Power - Allegations of President Trump directing the Department of Justice and other officials to target political adversaries [1] - Concerns raised about the President potentially mobilizing the IRS and other governmental levers against perceived enemies [3] - Accusations that the administration is attempting to intimidate and silence dissent [3] Concerns Regarding Freedom of Speech & Assembly - Concerns expressed that the sacred American tradition of free speech and dissent is at risk [3] - Criticism of leaders in the House and Senate for allegedly fanning the flames of dissent related to peaceful expressions of concern [4] - Discussion of "no kings rallies" and suggestions that they could lead to riots [2] Legislative & Policy Criticism - Republican colleagues accused of being a "reckless rubber stamp" for Donald Trump's policies [5] - Claims that Republican policies are hurting everyday Americans to reward billionaire donors with massive, permanent tax breaks [5]

Company Vision - X (formerly Twitter) aims to be a true public square, upholding free speech within legal boundaries [1] Leadership Stance - Elon Musk emphasizes the importance of free speech as the bedrock of democracy for X [1]

RT Chris Pavlovski 🏴‍☠️ (@chrispavlovski)Major news from the French courts.Rumble is back in France after a ruling in our favor.Free speech wins, Rumble is going global! ...

Core Argument - Private money is likened to the 5th Amendment, granting the right to silence [1] - Code as speech implies a right to private money, mirroring free speech rights [1] Legal Analogy - The initial comparison of private money to the 2nd Amendment was deemed inaccurate [1]

Freedom of Press Advocacy - The speaker emphasizes the critical role of a free press in ensuring citizens are informed and able to make informed choices in a democracy [1][2] - The speech highlights instances of press suppression in various countries, including Bangladesh (where over 160 journalists lost press passes), Turkey (where reporters were deported), Hong Kong (where editors were jailed), and India (where a BBC documentary was blocked) [2] - The speaker argues that suppressing the press leads to a society where citizens are uninformed and unable to hold leaders accountable [2] Call to Action - The speaker urges the audience to be curious about information, responsible in sharing it, and courageous in speaking the truth [4] - The speech encourages individuals to analyze information critically, question its sources, and avoid spreading unverified rumors [4] - The speaker advocates for standing up against wrongdoing and supporting those who report the truth, even in the face of threats or opposition [5] Examples and Analogies - The speaker uses the analogy of a WhatsApp group to illustrate how easily misinformation can spread and how important it is to verify information before believing it [2] - The speaker shares a personal anecdote about concealing a sibling's mistake to highlight the importance of telling the truth, even in small matters [3] - The speech references the courage of reporters in Myanmar (Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo) and Belarus who faced imprisonment and threats for reporting on sensitive issues [4]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Jimmy Kimmel's comments about the assassination of political activist Charlie Kirk led to a temporary suspension of his show, sparking a national debate on free speech and the role of media in political discourse [1][2][4]. Group 1: Controversy and Suspension - Jimmy Kimmel's remarks about Charlie Kirk's death were perceived as a distortion by some right-wing media, prompting calls for his show to be dropped by TV stations [2][3]. - The show was suspended by Nexstar Media Group Inc., Sinclair Inc., and ABC, with demands for Kimmel to apologize and donate to Kirk's cause [4]. - Kimmel returned to the air on September 23, achieving his highest-ever ratings following the suspension [4]. Group 2: Economic Context - The late-night show format is facing economic challenges due to competition from streaming platforms and changing viewer demographics, leading CBS to cancel "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" for financial reasons [5]. - Kimmel noted that low ratings for preceding shows have negatively impacted his viewership, alongside the availability of clips on YouTube [5]. Group 3: Future Considerations - Kimmel's contract is set to expire in May, and he has not confirmed whether he will continue hosting "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" after that [3]. - Despite the financial pressures, Kimmel expressed skepticism about reports claiming that shows like his and Colbert's are losing tens of millions of dollars, citing additional revenue sources [6].

The Supreme Court sounded like they're leaning toward knocking down a conversion therapy ban in Colorado. Can't say for sure, obviously, until we know the decision, but that is the tea leaf reading from oral arguments today in a case brought by a Christian therapist. She offers what she calls voluntary faith-based therapy for kids and argues this Colorado ban violates her right to free speech.Now, the state says therapy by licensed professionals, that's not free speech and that it is simply trying to stop a ...

much. And joining us now, Portland City Councelor Anne Helita Borio. Um, thank you for joining us, counselor. >> Thank you for having me today.>> Um, what is your expectation for what Donald Trump will be doing in Portland if your lawsuit, the city's lawsuit against um, sending in federal troops is not successful. Well, I just want to start off by saying that our lawsuit is going to be successful because he simply does not have the same facts that we are seeing on the ground. So, I don't know if he's gettin ...