Law

Search documents
DMRC DEADLINE: ROSEN, GLOBAL INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Digimarc Corporation Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important July 8 Deadline in Securities Class Action – DMRC
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-07-05 18:42
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Digimarc Corporation during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on July 8, 2025, and the potential for compensation without out-of-pocket costs [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Digimarc Corporation, and investors who wish to serve as lead plaintiff must act by July 8, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Digimarc made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, specifically about a large commercial partner not renewing a significant contract, which adversely affected subscription and annual recurring revenue [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and ranking in the top four for settlements since 2013 [3].
What should democracies do about anti-democratic parties? | Ulrich Wagrandl | TEDxVienna Salon
TEDx Talks· 2025-07-04 17:00
[Music] thank you today I'm going to tell you that what most people think about democracy is wrong the prevailing folk theory of democracy goes something like this in a democracy the people are always right the majority determines what's right and wrong and politicians should always just carry out the will of the people and I think we've all been brought up with this very simplistic notion about how our democracy is supposed to work um and the problem it's not true we're about to discuss whether democracies ...
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-07-04 16:40
The lackadaisical enforcement of EU law is clear for all to see. It is the commission’s job to crack down on misbehaviour, but it has become less interested in playing bad cop https://t.co/lZYAD1nyup ...
DV DEADLINE: ROSEN, A TRUSTED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – DV
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-07-04 13:06
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by July 21, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customer ad spending to closed platforms where its capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services faced significant challenges in monetization due to the high costs and time required for technology development on closed platforms [5]. - The lawsuit also points out that DoubleVerify overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots and that its risk disclosures were misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].