在当地时间25日结束的北约峰会上，北约成员国承诺在2035年前把年度国防开支提高至国内生产总值的 5%。然而对于如何实现新的军费目标，北约内部仍存分歧。俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫表示，西方 正在利用虚假的"俄罗斯威胁论"向西方国家纳税人敛财，也就是将国防开支增至国内生产总值的5%， 这是用来骗取资金并继续向乌克兰输送武器的技巧。（央视新闻） ...

Group 1 - The NATO summit in The Hague concluded with a push for member countries to increase military spending from 2% to 5% of GDP, although this goal was met with skepticism and opposition from countries like Spain, leading to claims of "symbolic number games" [1][2] - President Trump emphasized that allies should use the additional military spending to purchase American weapons, while French President Macron advocated for the development of European military systems to avoid dependence on the U.S., highlighting the internal divisions within NATO, particularly between the U.S. and Europe [1][8] - NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg promoted the "China threat" narrative to justify increased military spending, raising questions about NATO's intentions as its members already account for 55% of global military expenditure [1][10] Group 2 - The summit was characterized by a brief duration and a vague declaration, which allowed member countries flexibility in interpreting the commitment to the 5% military spending target, reflecting negotiations among countries like Spain that set a maximum of 2.1% [2][4] - Other NATO countries, including Belgium and Luxembourg, are exploring similar flexible spending plans, indicating a broader reluctance to meet the 5% target due to financial constraints [4][5] - The agreement to split the 5% target into 3.5% for core military spending and 1.5% for infrastructure and cybersecurity provides member countries with operational flexibility [5] Group 3 - Trump's approach to NATO spending has been described as transactional, with an expectation that allies must pay for the security guarantees provided by the U.S., raising concerns about the future of collective defense commitments [7][10] - The U.S. arms industry is poised to benefit significantly from increased military spending in Europe, as American defense companies dominate the European arms market [8] - The absence of leaders from key Indo-Pacific nations at the summit raises questions about NATO's efforts to expand its influence in that region, indicating a disconnect between U.S. strategic ambitions and regional realities [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns of U.S. officials regarding China's rapid advancements in space military technology, which they perceive as a strategic threat to U.S. national security [1][4]. Summary by Sections U.S. Concerns about China's Space Capabilities - U.S. Space Command Chief Stephen Whiting expressed anxiety over China's "astonishing" speed in developing space military technology, which he claims poses a "strategic threat" to the U.S. [1] - Whiting emphasized the importance of U.S.-Australia cooperation in enhancing space capabilities, particularly in monitoring regions closer to China [1][4]. Specific Threats Identified - Whiting outlined three main concerns regarding China's space capabilities: 1. China's establishment of a space-based target identification system aimed at locating and tracking U.S. and allied forces in the Indo-Pacific region [3]. 2. The rapid deployment of a comprehensive suite of anti-space weapon systems, including network attacks, satellite communication disruptions, and high-energy lasers [3]. 3. The integration of space advantages into traditional military branches, enhancing the lethality and precision of the Chinese military [3]. U.S. Military Responses and Reports - The U.S. military has repeatedly raised alarms about China's space threats, with a recent report indicating that China possesses over 510 satellites with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities [4]. - In the past decade, China has launched 875 satellites, with 260 launched in 2024 alone, including 67 ISR-capable satellites [4]. - Whiting has previously stated that the perceived space threat from China is becoming increasingly "real and urgent," prompting the U.S. to prepare its defenses, including the deployment of the "Iron Dome" missile defense system [4][5]. International Reactions - In response to U.S. claims, a Chinese defense spokesperson criticized the U.S. for escalating military presence in space and accused it of violating international treaties, thereby exacerbating the arms race in outer space [5].

渲染"中国海军舰艇数量与美国相当""2030年拥有1000枚核弹头"，本质是为北约渗透亚太寻找合法 性。北约用所谓"中国威胁"来为自己的扩军备战铺路，甚至抢在美国前头表态要为可能的台海冲突"做 好准备"。如果北约执意要把战争触角伸到亚洲，几乎可以肯定的是，它增加的军费越多，欧洲要吞下 的战略苦果就越大。 这种"自己扩军却指责他人威胁"的逻辑不仅愚蠢，而且很坏。吕特强调北约"没有退出机制"，实际 上是恐吓成员国，想要中途跳车，根本不可能。其所宣称的"确保未来安全"，恰恰是试图将欧洲绑死在 美国战车上。作为一部早该熄火的战争机器，北约靠紧抱美国大腿、替华盛顿"干脏活"来续命，不断编 造"战争等于安全"的荒唐叙事来唬欧洲人。北约的存在已经成为欧洲的负资产。一个典型例子是，如果 没有北约东扩，俄乌冲突就无从谈起。 6月24日至25日，北约峰会在荷兰海牙举行。在会后的联合声明中，最重要的"成果"就是同意将军 费提高到占国内生产总值（GDP）的5%——这一目标在今年年初由美方提出时曾在欧洲引起"激烈反 弹"。北约秘书长吕特作为华盛顿的"忠实推销员"，为了"诓"欧洲国家掏更多钱，可以说想尽了办 法："俄罗斯威胁"不够用了， ...

德国总理默茨：我们绝不能把自由和安全视为理所当然，必须认真对待俄罗斯带来的威胁。 ...

法国总统马克龙：我们之所以采取这一切措施，都是因为俄罗斯的威胁。 ...

匈牙利总理欧尔班：俄罗斯不足以对我们构成真正的威胁，我们远比俄罗斯更加强大。 ...

Core Points - German Chancellor Merz stated that Russia poses a threat to the security of the continent [1] Group 1 - The statement emphasizes the geopolitical risks associated with Russia's actions [1]

北约秘书长吕特：鉴于俄罗斯的威胁，提升国防支出已成为唯一选择。 ...

美联储主席鲍威尔：美联储拥有应对网络安全威胁的资源。 ...