Core Viewpoint - Trump Media and Technology Group has been identified as a target in a broad investigation led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, raising concerns about the misuse of power against private businesses and their investors [2]. Group 1: Company Overview - Trump Media operates Truth Social, a social media platform aimed at promoting free speech, Truth+, a family-friendly streaming service, and is launching Truth.Fi, a FinTech brand focused on America First investment vehicles [3]. Group 2: Recent Developments - Devin Nunes, CEO of Trump Media, announced that the company was among over 400 Trump-related entities subjected to surveillance, with a subpoena issued for their banking records by Jack Smith [2]. - Nunes expressed the need for clarity on what the SEC and J.P. Morgan Chase knew regarding the subpoena and any potential leaks of their banking information [2].

RT Naomi Seibt (@SeibtNaomi)I AM SEEKING ASYLUM IN THE U.S. 🇩🇪🇺🇸My name is Naomi Seibt,I am the 1st German applying for asylum under President Trump due to political persecution.As a free speech advocate and supporter of the AfD party, I am the target of• intelligence surveillance• state media defamation• ANTIFA threatsThanks to @elonmusk, I received a voice on 𝕏 and was able to help make the AfD party internationally popular.The German government is supporting left-wing vioIence, covering up MIGRANT CRlMES ...

RT Joseph D. McBride, Esq. (@McBrideLawNYC)Tucker Carlson’s decision to interview Nick Fuentes is a masterclass in the First Amendment. The right to speak was never meant to protect the popular or the polite. It exists to defend dissent, discomfort, and the brutal truths that free men must be willing to face.Free speech protects every citizen’s right to criticize, challenge, praise, or condemn government, including the Israeli government, which is openly and fiercely criticized by its own citizens every sin ...

Acquisition & Value Proposition - Elon Musk suggests the acquisition of Twitter, despite its cost, is justified by the value of free speech [1]

RT Martin De Luca (@emd_worldwide)On October 21, Brazil’s Supreme Court (STF) formally established a new crime of “disinformation.”As explained by the editorial board of a leading newspaper in Brazil, @Estadao, by criminalizing “the propagation of lies,” the STF bypassed Congress (again) and violated the principle of legality — that no one can be punished for a crime not defined by law.World-famous censor-in-chief Alexandre de Moraes, having learned nothing from U.S. sanctions, warned that “all who insist o ...

RT The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion)The Online Safety Act is set for a showdown with US Courts.What was promised as domestic UK legislation has now creeped into the American sphere.US firms, including 4chan, are refusing to comply with Ofcom guidance on the grounds that it’s an egregious attack against constitutional free speech.Read more below 👇 ...

Core Viewpoint - ExxonMobil has filed a lawsuit against the state of California, claiming that two new climate change laws violate its right to free speech and force the company to adopt the state's perspective on climate change [1][6]. Summary by Relevant Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Eastern District Court for California, asserting that the laws compel ExxonMobil to accept blame for climate change, particularly regarding oil and gas corporations [1][5]. - The company argues that the laws conflict with federal regulations on climate and financial risk disclosures [11]. Specific Laws - One law mandates large companies doing business with the state to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions annually [2]. - The second law requires businesses with over $500 million in state contracts to report biennially on how climate change may impact their operations [2]. Compliance Requirements - Both laws necessitate ExxonMobil's adherence to California's Greenhouse Gas Protocol and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, which the company contends unfairly assigns responsibility for global warming to it [5]. Company Position - ExxonMobil acknowledges the risks associated with climate change and supports efforts to address these risks but maintains that the First Amendment protects it from being compelled to endorse the state's viewpoint [6]. - The company is seeking a court order to prevent the implementation of these laws until 2026 [11].

Legacy media lies and maximizes for click bait profiting.𝕏 has become the most trusted source for news. It’s where news breaks first.Elon Musk saved free speech is 🇺🇸 https://t.co/6rOuST7kor ...

RT Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs)The New York Legislature passed S4505, mandating warning labels on social media platforms for all users, mirroring California's AB 56. This would compel companies to surveil users and deliver government-mandated messages, amounting to compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment.X is deeply concerned that lawmakers in California and now New York —bound by oath to defend the Constitution—are advancing measures like AB 56 and S4505 that erode free speech pr ...

Content Suppression & Censorship - YouTube and Google are accused of systematically suppressing content [1] - The platforms are criticized for prioritizing paid propaganda over free speech [1] - The platforms are accused of aiding and abetting a "holocaust" by throttling truth and boosting killers [1] Ethical Concerns - The corporation running the platforms is perceived as having a "dim & twisted worldview" [1] - The platforms are accused of enabling genocide and profiting from war criminals' propaganda [1]