Core Points - Jorge Zamora-Quezada, a former rheumatologist in Texas, was sentenced to 10 years in prison for committing massive healthcare fraud, amounting to over $118 million in fraudulent claims [1][19][22] - The fraudulent activities included falsely diagnosing healthy patients with rheumatoid arthritis and subjecting them to unnecessary treatments and tests, leading to severe health consequences for many [10][18][20] - The case is considered one of the most egregious healthcare fraud cases in U.S. history, with the judge emphasizing the need for accountability in the medical profession [1][22] Summary by Sections Background - Jorge Zamora-Quezada graduated from the University of Guadalajara in Mexico in 1980 and obtained certifications in internal medicine and rheumatology in the U.S. [3] - His medical career was marred by multiple allegations of sexual harassment and disciplinary actions for providing unnecessary treatments [3][4] Fraudulent Activities - From 2000 to 2018, Zamora-Quezada diagnosed over a thousand patients with rheumatoid arthritis, including children as young as 11, and conducted unnecessary medical procedures [1][10][15] - He manipulated medical records and employed illegal tactics to deceive insurance companies, resulting in over $118 million in fraudulent claims [6][10][11] Legal Proceedings - In 2020, Zamora-Quezada was convicted on multiple charges, leading to the revocation of his medical license and his inclusion in the "Top Ten Worst Medical Professionals" list by Medscape [19] - The sentencing on May 21, 2023, was attended by over 30 victims, highlighting the extensive harm caused by his fraudulent practices [20][21] Impact on Patients - Many patients suffered severe health issues due to unnecessary treatments, including strokes and permanent disabilities, with some losing their ability to perform daily activities [18][20] - Victims expressed their anguish and the long-term impact of Zamora-Quezada's actions on their lives, emphasizing the breach of trust in the doctor-patient relationship [21][22]

此前，美国马里兰州联邦地区法院法官德博拉·博德曼裁定，除特殊情况外，"政府效率部"不得获取社 会保障署涉及个人信息等敏感数据。之后，特朗普政府上诉至位于弗吉尼亚州的美国联邦第四巡回上诉 法院，该法院支持下级法院的裁决。对于该结果，特朗普政府向联邦最高法院提起诉讼。 特朗普1月20日在宣誓就职当天签署行政令，组建由马斯克牵头的名为"政府效率部"的顾问委员会，并 称这将大幅削减联邦开支，以恢复联邦政府的能力和效率。"政府效率部"自成立以来因获取多个联邦政 府部门信息和进行大规模裁员，遭多方批评，并面临多项诉讼。 5月30日，马斯克正式从"政府效率部"卸任。(完) 中新社华盛顿6月6日电(记者沙晗汀)美国联邦最高法院当地时间6日裁定，"政府效率部"可以获取社会 保障署涉及个人信息等敏感数据。 在当天的裁决中，6名保守派大法官认为"政府效率部"可获取相关敏感数据，3名自由派大法官表示反 对。 美国社会保障署负责管理社会保障，包括退休、残障人士等社会福利。该机构掌握绝大多数美国民众的 个人信息，包括学校记录、收入状况及医疗信息等。 该诉讼原告包括美国教师联合会、美国退休人员协会和美国州、县、市雇员联合会。原告认为，"政 ...

LOS ANGELES, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming July 22, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (“Red Cat” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR RED CAT INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS ...

NEW YORK, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Digimarc Corporation (“Digimarc” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: DMRC).   Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at newaction@pomlaw.com or 646-581-9980, (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased. The class action concerns whether Digimarc and certain of ...

6月6日，东旭蓝天（已退市）和东旭光电（已退市）发布公告称，收到行政处罚决定书。 《每日经济新闻》记者注意到，监管部门对东旭集团有限公司（以下简称东旭集团）处以约5.8亿元罚 款，对李兆廷处以约5.9亿元罚款，相关责任主体总计被罚约17亿元。 巅峰时曾掌握三家上市公司 李兆廷为东旭系掌门人，曾经的光伏业界大佬。 据此前东旭光电的公告，李兆廷出生于1965年。1986年，李兆廷被分配至石家庄市柴油机厂，先后担任 技术员、车间主任、总经理助理、副总经理。 从1996年开始，李兆廷任河北东旭投资集团有限公司董事。2019年，李兆廷以235亿元财富在当年成为 石家庄首富。 巅峰时期，李兆廷手握东旭光电、东旭蓝天、嘉麟杰等三家上市公司实控权。 合计罚款金额达17亿元 6月6日，东旭蓝天称，其收到河北证监局和深圳证监局的行政处罚决定书。 回顾李兆廷的发家史，可以明显观察到李兆廷很擅长资本运作。 2011年，东旭集团接手宝石A，后宝石A更名为东旭光电。2015年，东旭集团成功成为宝安地产第一大 股东。随后，东旭集团将名下的光伏发电业务板块注入宝安地产，并更名为东旭蓝天。2016年，东旭集 团又通过股权受让的方式，控制了嘉麟 ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Open Lending Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between February 24, 2022, and March 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that the defendants made false statements regarding the Company's risk-based pricing models and profit share revenue [2]. - It is alleged that the Company failed to disclose that its 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had significantly depreciated in value compared to their outstanding loan balances [2]. - The complaint also states that the defendants misrepresented the underperformance of the Company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans, leading to materially misleading statements about the Company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until June 30, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without incurring any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

NEW YORK, June 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Open Lending Corporation ("Open Lending Corporation" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: LPRO) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Open Lending Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: https:// ...

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Certain Health Management Company was fined 61,500 yuan for failing to clearly display prices, fabricating promotional prices, and not maintaining a cosmetics inventory ledger [1][2]. Group 1: Pricing Violations - The company did not display a price list for its beauty packages in-store, violating regulations that require clear pricing for services offered [1]. - The company was found to have fabricated prices for beauty services on platforms like Douyin and Dazhong Dianping, which constitutes price fraud [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Compliance - The company failed to establish and maintain an inventory ledger for cosmetics, violating the Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulations [2]. - The market supervision department emphasized the importance of compliance with pricing regulations and maintaining transparent pricing systems to build consumer trust [3]. Group 3: Consumer Protection - Consumers are advised to verify price tags against checkout prices and be cautious of promotional language that may mislead [3]. - The case highlights typical issues in price disclosure, promotional integrity, and product traceability among some businesses [3].

但是，如何解决本地化支付与销售回款，正成为中资企业布局拉美非洲市场普遍遭遇的一大难题。 由于拉美非洲地区信用卡普及度不高，近年众多本地支付方式纷纷兴起且呈现高度碎片化的竞争格 局。这令众多中资企业骤然发现，自己若不接入众多本地支付方式，就难以触及当地消费者与打开 销路；反之若接入众多本地支付方式，又是一项复杂且繁琐的工作。 这令众多跨境支付机构嗅到商机。 Airwallex空中云汇完成对墨西哥支付服务提供商MexPago公司的收购，且在巴西获得支付牌照， 着手解决中资企业布局拉美市场的本地收款与资金分发等支付问题。 于翔告诉记者，EBANX通过聚合支付方式，集成拉美非洲众多国家约200种本地主流支付方式， 涵盖信用卡、现金券、移动货币（短信支付）电子钱包、即时支付与先买后付等，提供一站式的聚 合支付解决方案。 要真正解决中资企业拓展拉美非洲地区的支付挑战，跨境支付 服务商还需做好"支付服务"，即围绕中资企业的差异化支付诉 求，结合拉美非洲当地消费者与企业的支付习惯与支付监管政 策变化，提供更接地气的支付解决方案，助力中资企业在拉美 非洲地区取得成功。 作者：陈植 封图：图虫创意 随着中国与拉美非洲地区的经贸往 ...

本播客由扣子空间（coze.cn）一键生成 整理｜冬梅、核子可乐 2024 年，全球录制音乐市场迎来里程碑时刻，总收入飙升至 296 亿美元。其中，流媒体经济贡献突 出，年收入首次突破 200 亿美元大关。然而，这一蓬勃发展的领域，却因 AI 技术的火爆成为了犯罪 分子眼中的 "肥肉"，利用 AI 技术进行的流媒体欺诈问题日益严峻。 利用 AI 诈骗流量，获利千万美元 近日，《连线》报道的一起涉嫌利用 AI 欺诈的案件引发热议。 在这起涉及 AI 生成音乐的开创性刑事案件中，一名 52 岁的北卡罗来纳州男子被控利用 AI 创作虚假 歌曲，并在 Amazon Music、苹果音乐、Spotify 及 YouTube Music 等音乐平台上进行欺诈性传播以 获取非法版税。 从起诉书来看，利用这些自动账户外加虚拟专用网络（VPN）模拟不同地理位置，被告人恶意操纵 流媒体数据，造成了全球用户都在收听他歌曲的假象。 Smith 承认， 他每天可以产生约 66 万 1440 次流媒体播放，每年版税收入超过 120 万美元 。为了 避免被平台管理员发现，他还将刻意将流量分摊到大量曲目当中。 为了进一步增加利润，Smith ...