意大利总理办公室：意大利完全支持欧盟委员会的努力，将在未来几天内加大相关工作力度。 ...

Core Points - The European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen survived a no-confidence vote in the European Parliament with 360 votes against and 175 votes in favor, highlighting internal friction among her supporters and dissatisfaction with her leadership style [1][3][4] - The no-confidence motion was initiated by Romanian far-right MEP Piperea, receiving support from 77 MEPs from various right-wing political groups, despite most political groups in the European Parliament publicly rejecting the motion [3][4] - Political analysts suggest that the vote serves as a warning to von der Leyen, indicating that the ease of initiating such motions could lead to political damage, even if not passed [4][5] Group 1 - The no-confidence vote reflects concerns over the lack of transparency and accountability in the leadership of the European Commission [3] - Von der Leyen's leadership style has faced criticism, with complaints about her small decision-making circle and her tendency to directly handle significant issues [5] - The political landscape is shifting, with a notable increase in seats for far-right parties and a decrease for traditional parties, complicating von der Leyen's ability to implement her legislative agenda [4][5] Group 2 - The recent no-confidence vote is the first of its kind for a European Commission President since 2014, with the last president to resign due to such a vote being Jacques Santer in 1999 [1][3] - There is growing discontent among von der Leyen's supporters, particularly from the Socialists and Democrats, who blame the European People's Party for compromising with far-right groups [4][5] - The media in Germany has expressed skepticism about von der Leyen's position, indicating that her approval ratings may be declining [5]

欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩：欧盟委员会完全支持国际刑事法院及其官员。 ...

匈牙利总理欧班幕僚长：欧盟委员会的提案对匈牙利和斯洛伐克造成针对性伤害。 ...