Los Angeles, Feb. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Triller Group Inc (Nasdaq: ILLR; ILLRW) (“Triller” or the “Company”) today announced the appointment of Enrome LLP (“Enrome”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective immediately. The appointment was approved by the Audit Committee of Triller’s Board of Directors. Enrome, a PCAOB-registered firm with specialized expertise in audit and assurance services for public companies, is well-equipped to support the Company’s financial re ...

Core Insights - The cannabis industry has seen a shift from fear-based federal policies to evidence-based reforms, highlighting the need for responsible cannabis policy that balances access with education and accountability [5][6][10][12] Group 1: Cannabis Policy and Reform - Federal cannabis policy historically relied on fear, leading to overcriminalization and negative impacts on communities [5] - The 2018 Farm Bill, signed by President Trump, legalized industrial hemp and marked a pragmatic shift in drug policy, promoting economic opportunities and state autonomy [6][7] - The Trump administration's approach respected states' rights, allowing local governance to inform effective cannabis regulation [7] Group 2: Personal Experience and Insights - Regular cannabis use can lead to diminished clarity, motivation, and emotional presence, with consequences that may not be immediately apparent [3][9] - Acknowledging the risks associated with habitual cannabis consumption, especially for young people, is essential for comprehensive reform [10] - The importance of discipline, accountability, and clear boundaries in personal and professional life has been reinforced through stepping away from cannabis [11] Group 3: Future Directions - Cannabis policy is at a crossroads, with the potential to either repeat past mistakes or continue evidence-based reforms [12] - Meaningful change requires accountability and the willingness to adjust policies based on real-world outcomes [12]

Legal & Investigative Updates - The Justice Department released a new batch of Epstein files [1] - The files include an email from DOJ officials discussing the search for possible co-conspirators in the Epstein case [1] - Legal analysts and attorneys for Epstein survivors are weighing in on what this means for victims seeking accountability [1]

Government Transparency & Legal Compliance - The Trump administration is facing criticism for the incomplete release of the Epstein files, potentially violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act [1][4][5] - At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ's Epstein web page, including a photograph of Donald Trump [1][2] - The Justice Department had a legal obligation to release the full files, with exceptions only for victim identification and child sexual abuse materials [4] - Congressman Ro Connor suggested impeachment is an option for those obstructing justice regarding the Epstein files release [9][10] - The justification provided for redactions in the released files was deemed unsatisfactory, with concerns about the volume of redactions without explanation [18][19] Political Implications & Reactions - Some Republicans privately express frustration with Donald Trump's handling of the Epstein files issue, fearing it harms the party [7] - There is speculation that the Epstein fight may have contributed to some Republican colleagues leaving Congress [13][14] - Vice President JD Vance questioned the US government's interest in keeping Epstein's clients secret [5] - Congressman Massie highlighted Vance's question, suggesting a lack of transparency [5] Allegations & Suspicions - Allegations exist that Donald Trump knew about underage girls being trafficked from Mara Lago by Jeffrey Epstein [17] - The refusal to fully release the Epstein files raises questions about why Donald Trump is allegedly covering up information [8][16][20]

Legal and Compliance Issues - The administration broke the law by not releasing all files related to the subject matter by the established deadline [1] - Redactions were excessive and potentially politically motivated, violating the law [1] - There is a lack of explanation and context for the redactions [1] - The released documents are only a fraction, with about 50% already public and the other 50% heavily redacted [1] Political Strategy and Accountability - Democrats are exploring legal action, including potential lawsuits, to hold the administration accountable [1] - There is frustration among some Democrats regarding the lack of immediate action and preparedness [1][2] - The focus on former President Clinton in the released documents is viewed with suspicion, potentially as a diversionary tactic [1] - The oversight committee is continuing to seek documents from financial institutions and the subject's estate [1][2] Document Release and Investigation - The released documents were heavily redacted and incomplete, with little new incriminating information [2] - The Justice Department's release of information related to Bill Clinton suggests there is no active investigation into him [2] - The oversight committee's subpoena may have been too narrowly written, lacking requests for underlying emails and context [3][4]

Legal & Governmental Scrutiny - The focus is on ensuring truth, justice, and accountability for the predators involved in the Jeffrey Epstein case [3] - There is concern that the government, particularly under the Trump administration, may be undermining the disclosure of information related to the case [4] - Key figures like Cash Patel, Pam Bondi, and Todd Blanch are under scrutiny for their involvement, potentially facing legal repercussions for not being truthful [6][7] - Pardons from Donald Trump are seen as a potential incentive for accomplices to remain silent [7][8] Ghislaine Maxwell's Situation - Ghislaine Maxwell's treatment in prison, including a potential "sweetheart deal" involving a minimum-security camp and special privileges, is raising concerns about transparency and fairness [9][12] - Todd Blanch's visit to Maxwell, seemingly focused on protecting Donald Trump rather than uncovering further crimes, is viewed as suspicious [11] - Allegations of five-star treatment for Maxwell, including room service and computer access, are being investigated [12] Information Disclosure & Transparency - The released documents are heavily redacted, raising questions about the extent of information being withheld and the reasons for redaction [2] - There is a perceived lack of transparency and potential cover-up by those involved in handling the case [8] - The timing of information releases and testimonies is being questioned, with accusations of delays and shifting narratives [4][5]

Survivor Concerns & Emotional Impact - Survivors are experiencing significant anxiety and fear as they await the release of the files, with concerns about redactions and what information will be revealed [1][2][5] - The slow, ongoing release of information is exacerbating fear and anxiety among survivors [5][6] - Survivors are hoping for the best regarding the protection of their information but are also bracing for potential negative impacts [7] - Survivors will need time to digest and process the released information before commenting publicly, and will consult with their lawyers [8] Accountability & Legal Proceedings - There is hope that the released files will contain specific names of individuals who have harmed the survivors, potentially jumpstarting criminal proceedings [9][10] - The release of information throughout the holiday season could potentially lead to renewed accountability efforts [9] Survivor Community & Support - The survivor community has been a strong force, but their activism has come at a personal cost [3] - Survivors are seeking a moment of united healing [4] - Organizations are working with survivors to help them navigate the release of information and its potential impact [2][6]

Market Trends & Investment Opportunities - The discussion revolves around the attractiveness of Japanese bond yields for investors, particularly in comparison to US Treasury yields [1][2] - The benchmark rate for Japan is at 75 basis points (0.75%), compared to the US rate of 350 to 375 basis points (3.50% to 3.75%), and the Japanese 10-year bond yield is around 2% versus the US 10-year bond yield over 4% [2] - A weaker dollar is considered beneficial for US companies, especially exporters of services, enhancing their competitiveness [4] - Central banks globally are competing against the dollar, partly driven by gold purchases [6] - US advantages include innovation, accountability, transparency, and governance, attracting private investors and corporations to US assets [6] - Global diversification of portfolios is returning, after a period of concentration in US assets [6] Potential Risks & Volatility - Concerns exist about potential rate cuts in the US leading to a weaker dollar, which could deter foreign investment and hedging activities [5] - Quadruple witching day, with $7 trillion in notional option exposure expiring, including $5 trillion tied to the S&P, raises concerns about market volatility [7] - Despite potential trepidation, the US market has demonstrated a remarkable ability to digest witching Fridays due to its liquidity and opportunities [8]

Incident Summary - Israeli forces killed Tamam Al-Qarra in Bani Suheila, east of Khan Younis [1] - Three individuals attempting to retrieve Al-Qarra's body were also killed by Israeli snipers [1] - The report alleges a pattern of targeting civilians and those attempting rescue [1] Claims and Allegations - Israel claims a soldier was wounded by a stray bullet [2] - Israel threatens retaliatory strikes on civilians despite lacking evidence [2] - The report suggests a perceived lack of international accountability for Israeli actions [1][2]

Sex Trafficking Investigation - Congress demands the DOJ release files related to the sex trafficking investigation, emphasizing the victims' right to know the truth about who was involved beyond Maxwell and Epstein [3][4] - The deadline for the DOJ to release the files is tomorrow, and Congress expects full transparency and accountability [4][6] - Failure by the DOJ to meet the deadline would be a violation of a judge's order, potentially leading to contempt of court [7] - Congress has an oversight role and may pull in individuals from the DOJ to demand explanations if the documents are not released [9] - House Oversight Committee has obtained records from the Epstein estate, and the Senate Banking Committee has called for a hearing to investigate ties between Epstein and US financial institutions like JP Morgan Chase [10] - Congress is following the money trail to uncover who was involved in the sex trafficking scheme and whether others should be held accountable [11][12] - Senator Cortez Masto highlights the importance of supporting victims and providing them with information and a pathway to survivorship [14] - Congress wants to see how far the DOJ's investigation went by examining the documents and following the money trail through private planes and financial transactions [15][16] Military Spending - President Trump announced a "warrior dividend" of $1,776 for over 1.45 million military service members [16] - Congress questions the source of the funds for this dividend, as they have not appropriated money for this purpose [18][19] - Congress supports increasing military pay, as demonstrated by the 3.8% increase in the Defense Authorization Act, but seeks oversight and accountability regarding the additional money [17]