Core Viewpoint - The appointment of Lindsey Halligan by President Trump to lead the U.S. Attorney's office in eastern Virginia has raised concerns among former federal prosecutors, who view it as an attempt to use the criminal justice system for political retribution against his opponents [1][2][3]. Group 1: Appointment and Reactions - Lindsey Halligan was appointed to replace Erik Siebert, who was removed for not moving quickly enough against Trump's political rivals [1][4]. - The White House defended Halligan's qualifications, stating she has a proven track record, despite her lack of prosecutorial experience at local or federal levels [4][8]. - Former federal prosecutors have expressed alarm over the implications of Halligan's appointment, suggesting it reflects authoritarian tendencies rather than adherence to the rule of law [3][10]. Group 2: Investigations and Targets - The Justice Department under Trump has initiated investigations against several political opponents, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff, over alleged mortgage fraud [2][6]. - Former FBI Director James Comey is also under investigation regarding his role in the FBI's probe into Trump's 2016 campaign [2][7]. - The investigations have been characterized as politically motivated, with critics arguing that they undermine the integrity of the justice system [5][10]. Group 3: Implications of Leadership Changes - Trump's direct connection of Siebert's removal to insufficient legal action against his rivals indicates a shift towards using the justice system for political ends [4][10]. - Concerns have been raised about Halligan's ability to navigate the extraordinary political pressures she will face in her new role, given her limited experience [8][10]. - The situation has been described as a troubling development for the rule of law, with implications for the independence of the justice system [3][5].