Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Dow Inc. overstated its ability to manage macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, as well as its financial flexibility to support dividends [2]. - It is alleged that the true extent of negative impacts from competitive pressures, declining global sales, and product oversupply was understated [2]. - The defendants' public statements are claimed to have been materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until October 28, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing significant settlements for shareholders and is recognized as a leading firm in securities litigation [4]. - The firm has over 70 employees dedicated to serving clients in complex securities cases and has been ranked among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. for seven consecutive years [4].

Legal & Judicial Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship [1] - The judge also granted class-action status to a lawsuit seeking to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship [1] - The ruling comes two weeks after a Supreme Court decision imposing new limits on the judiciary's ability to issue nationwide injunctions [2] - The judge issued a nationwide injunction on birthright citizenship, arguing it's different due to the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of potential parents on student visas [3][4] - The executive order applied not just to undocumented immigrants, but anyone without permanent legal status, meaning children of those on student visas would not be US citizens [4][5] - The Supreme Court may need to decide if a district judge can issue a nationwide injunction in a class action suit, impacting district court reach and birthright citizenship [5] - No judge in America has ruled Trump's executive order (children born to people not permanently in the country are not citizens) is legal, but absent a nationwide injunction, it could go into effect in some places [8] Potential Future Implications - This class action route could be a potential roadmap for other plaintiffs seeking nationwide injunctions on various issues [9] - Both Republican conservatives and liberals could see this as a workaround to achieve nationwide injunctions by finding a class (like students) that exists across the country [9]

Legal & Policy Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide block against President Trump's order to end birthright citizenship [1] - The judge granted class action status to the plaintiff but excluded parents of children whose citizenship is threatened from the protected class [1][8] - The ACLU filed a class action lawsuit following a Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions [6] - The ruling is expected to protect over 150,000 children born in the US this year, ensuring their constitutional birthright citizenship [7] Immigration Raids & Conditions - Several groups, including the city of Los Angeles, are suing the Trump administration over immigration raids [2] - Individuals are reportedly being racially profiled and swept up in immigration raids, with constitutional rights being violated [16][17] - Detainees are allegedly held in deplorable conditions, with limited access to water and counsel [18][19] - Lawyers have faced force, including tear gas, while trying to protect people's rights [19] Potential Consequences & Concerns - There are concerns about potential chaos and a humanitarian crisis if 28 states start revoking birthright citizenship [11] - The question of what happens to stateless individuals, particularly those who cannot be repatriated, is raised [12] - Concerns are expressed about the dehumanization of people and the potential for the administration to deprive people of their citizenship [14] - Comparisons are being made between ICE force and vigilantes or Gestapo due to perceived impunity [23]