your reaction given the fact that you're literally at the center of this story to what you've seen so far from that IG report. >> Yeah. Well, the the the Pentagon and the White House are both saying that u this is an exoneration.Uh I I I don't let me just put it bluntly. I they they must think we're incredibly stupid as as citizens and as and as journalists um to to to to say that Hegath did nothing wrong. He put information in a commercial messaging app about an upcoming military strike conducted by human ...

Breaking news right now in Maryland. A hearing for John Bolton just ended and government lawyers are suggesting more charges could be filed against him. They hinted at that just moments ago during this morning's hearing.The first since Trump's former national security adviser was indicted last month on 18 counts of keeping and sharing defense information. Let's bring in MS Now senior legal reporter Lisa Rubin. MS now political analyst Anthony Kohley who's been uh part of the Biden justice department and for ...

Legal & Political Implications - The indictment of John Bolton, former National Security Advisor, for allegedly retaining and transmitting classified information, initiated under the Biden administration, faced pressure for expedited progress during the Trump administration [1] - The case highlights potential political motivations behind pursuing criminal charges against individuals disliked by former President Trump, including figures like Leticia James, James Comey, and Adam Schiff [2][3] - The evidence against Bolton is considered more substantial compared to cases against James Comey and Leticia James, where prosecutors reportedly resigned rather than pursue charges [4] - Bolton is accused of mishandling national security information, including sharing it electronically on unsecured messaging apps with his wife and daughter [5] - Bolton is expected to self-surrender, be formally charged, and plead not guilty [5][6]

Investigation Context - The affidavit for the search warrant into John Bolton's home has been released, with significant redactions [1] - A section of the affidavit, considered the most important, is blacked out under the heading "hack of John Bolton's AOL account by a foreign government" [2] Allegations and Evidence - The US government reportedly obtained John Bolton's emails from an adversarial foreign government, containing evidence that raised concerns about his handling of classified information [3] - This occurred during the Biden administration, and the Justice Department reviewed the information but opted not to bring charges [3] Potential Risks and Implications - Concerns existed regarding the sensitivity of how the information was acquired [4] - The disclosure of the US accessing the foreign government's systems could be damaging [4] - Two federal judges found probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and that evidence was in Bolton's home, leading to FBI searches [5]

Government & Legal Affairs - The US government obtained John Bolton's emails from an adversarial foreign government [3] - The Biden Justice Department reviewed the emails but opted not to bring charges [3][4] - Two separate federal judges found probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and that evidence was in John Bolton's home [5] - The FBI carried out searches of John Bolton's home [5] Cybersecurity & Intelligence - John Bolton's AOL account was hacked by a foreign government [3] - The US government accessed the foreign government's systems [4][6] - Concerns arose about John Bolton's handling of classified information based on the hacked emails [3] Media & Public Disclosure - The affidavit for the search warrant into John Bolton's home has been released, but heavily redacted [1][2] - The New York Times reported on the hack of John Bolton's AOL account, which was confirmed [2][3] - The public has been informed that the US acquired emails from a foreign government, which is considered damaging [4]

John Bolton, John Brennan, James Comey, Leticia James, Adam Schiff. They're all among the current and former officials the administration is now investigating. Does the president have an enemy's list.No, not at all. I think the president has a view that we should enforce the law and if people broke the law, then of course they should face some prosecution for doing so. Vice President JD Vance dismissing the notion President Trump might have an enemy's list days after the FBI searched the home and office of ...

Security Breach & Information Handling - Pentagon's watchdog received evidence of Pete Heget's Signal messages previewing a US bombing campaign in Yemen, derived from a classified email labeled secret/no foreign [1] - The information shared on Signal directly contradicts claims that Hexadet did not divulge classified information on the app [1] - The classification "secret/no foreign" means secret information not intended for foreign eyes [1] - Sharing classified documents could do serious damage to US national security [6] - Using a system where foreign eyes can access classified information compromises security [8] Pentagon & Internal Response - Individuals within the Pentagon attempted to handle classified information correctly initially [4] - A general overseeing US military operations in the Middle East used a classified email on a classified system for strike plans [4] - Some Pentagon personnel understand the importance of classification levels like "secret" and restrictions like "no foreigners" [5] Media & Public Awareness - The Washington Post reported on Pete Heget's messages on Signal [1] - Journalists and individuals within the Pentagon are acknowledged for doing their job [8]