RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)There are a ton of people, including but not limited to religious people, who just don't put much value in reality beyond what they need for their career and other practical considerations. The facts of evolution in particular don't touch upon most practical life enough to matter.Indeed the fantasies of creationism seem to have some benefits. I'd love for to hear your thoughts on this question: why do creationists have a higher Darwinian fitness than evolutionists? ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)Reality is quite the opposite of what you state: the highest Darwinian fitness of almost any culture is the Amish, who not coincidentally are also the most homogenous: they segregate themselves, in ways most of the rest of us considered rather extreme, from mass media and other subcultures. ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)Reality is quite the opposite of what you state: the highest Darwinian fitness of almost any culture is the Amish, who not coincidentally are also the most homogenous: they segregate themselves, in ways most of the rest of us considered rather extreme, from mass media and other subcultures. ...

This document is a tweet, and its content is philosophical/biological rather than related to finance or business. Therefore, a financial or business-oriented summary is not applicable. However, I can provide a summary focusing on the tweet's core idea. Core Idea - The tweet presents a controversial statement about the Darwinian fitness of creationists versus evolutionists, inviting discussion [1]

This document is a tweet, and its content is philosophical/biological rather than related to finance or business. Therefore, a financial or business-oriented summary is not applicable. However, I can provide a summary focusing on the tweet's core idea. Core Idea - The tweet presents a controversial statement about the Darwinian fitness of creationists versus evolutionists, inviting discussion [1]

Creationists have a higher Darwinian fitness than evolutionists. Discuss.Latinx Adjacent Doctor PhD (@TonerousHyus):American Conservatives losing only 0.1 fertility since the 1990s is a very under discussed phenomenon https://t.co/AzBOyvQeqO ...