Workflow
Destination-driven venues
icon
Search documents
BDL vs. ARKR: Which Dining Stock Deserves a Spot in Your Portfolio?
ZACKS· 2025-12-29 17:50
Core Viewpoint - Restaurant operators are facing mixed consumer spending, higher costs, and the need for concept refreshment, with Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR) and Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) as notable niche players with distinct models [1][2] Company Overview Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR) - Operates a portfolio of destination, high-traffic restaurants and food concepts in major tourist and urban markets, benefiting from premium locations and event-driven demand [2][10] - The business model is sensitive to site-specific risks, with significant revenue concentration in a few flagship venues, notably Bryant Park Grill & Café and The Porch at Bryant Park [12][13] - Historically grown through acquisitions and concept expansions, diversifying across various dining formats while leveraging operational expertise [11] Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) - Focuses on standardized neighborhood casual dining and high-volume liquor retail, providing a diversified revenue base and steadier local demand [2][7] - Operates through a partnership-based structure, allowing for operational control and recurring economics through management fees and royalties [8] - Revenue growth is supported by menu price increases and strong performance across both restaurant and liquor store segments [9] Stock Performance & Valuation - Over the past three months, BDL has outperformed ARKR, with BDL down 7.2% and ARKR down 10.5% [3] - In the past year, BDL has increased by 16.1%, while ARKR has seen a loss of 43.1% [3] - BDL's trailing 12-month enterprise value-to-sales (EV/S) ratio is 0.26X, while ARKR's forward sales multiple is 0.08X, both below the Retail-Wholesale sector average of 1.82X [5] Investment Considerations - Flanigan's offers a more stable operating model with diversified demand drivers, making it appealing for investors seeking consistency [15] - Ark Restaurants is better suited for those comfortable with higher site-level concentration risk, given its reliance on key flagship venues [15]