Group 1 - The consensus is leaning towards a hawkish cut with minimal commitment to further cuts, which aligns with market expectations [1][2] - The number of dissenting votes and their sources will be crucial in shaping future guidance from the Federal Reserve [2][3] - The dot plot's representation of potential future cuts will influence the language used in the Fed's statements, emphasizing data dependence [3][4] Group 2 - A significant number of dissenting votes could undermine Chair Powell's leadership and policy choices [4][6] - There is skepticism about the actual number of dissenters, with expectations that appeals for unity may reduce dissenting opinions [6][7] - Historical context suggests that calls for unity have been made in the past during challenging times, indicating a potential strategy for the current Fed leadership [6][7]