MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell details how Donald Trump’s Justice Department is “blissfully violating federal law” every night since Friday by refusing to release all of the Epstein files as Trump is telling the lie that "everybody was friendly” with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. » Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow MS NOW is the go-to destination for domestic and international breaking news, and best-in-class opinion journalism. For more context and news coverage of the most impor ...

Federal law previously banned states from collecting tolls on interstates because drivers already paid for roads through a tax on petrol. The problem is that this model no longer works https://t.co/5BTbJCuydi ...

#BREAKING: A portion of the long-awaited Epstein files were released as the Justice Department made the documents public in compliance with federal law.Read more: https://t.co/OoKEY8VqBPPhoto: House Oversight Committee https://t.co/mcja2qSuXF ...

Trump-Licensed Presidential Seal Beer Pong Set Could Violate Federal Lawhttps://t.co/cDwvVnY1oo https://t.co/OlCMCjYLIt ...

Legal & Political Landscape - Federal courts are grappling with the extent of presidential power to deploy the National Guard against the wishes of state governors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] - The core legal question revolves around whether the president has absolute discretion to determine when prerequisites for deploying the National Guard (foreign invasion, rebellion, inability to carry out federal law) exist, or whether that determination is subject to judicial review [4][5][9] - Concerns exist that granting the president unchecked discretion to militarize cities could lead to abuse of power [5][10][15][16] - Congress has laid out specific criteria for deploying the National Guard, but the DOJ argues the president has absolute discretion and it's not subject to judicial review [8][9] Intergovernmental Relations - The Trump administration's plans to deploy the National Guard to San Francisco were called off after pushback from the mayor and tech industry contacts [1][13] - Differing approaches exist among mayors in dealing with the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard, with some taking a more conciliatory approach [13][14] - Concerns are raised that a mayor's or governor's relationship with the president should not determine whether their cities are militarized [15][16] Immigration Enforcement & States' Rights - The Justice Department's stance on immigration enforcement raises concerns about potential overreach and disregard for states' rights [17][18][19] - The Attorney General of Illinois asserts that ICE does not have unlimited immunity and that local law enforcement is capable of maintaining peace [19][20]

Supreme Court agrees to review a federal law to determine whether the government may bar certain drug users from owning guns. https://t.co/cETHCJaPqV ...

Trump Golf Course Displays Gold Presidential Seal—Here’s Why That Could Violate Federal Lawhttps://t.co/QoshZG1LIy https://t.co/mcwA9mSV0G ...

Political/Social Commentary - Antifa websites openly advocate for actions that would intimidate ICE agents to the point of fearing entering a city [1] - The websites express concern about federal crackdowns on institutions sponsoring Antifa networks while simultaneously promoting "no-go zones" for federal forces [1] - These "no-go zones" create safety concerns for law enforcement [1] Legal Implications - The industry notes a potential double standard in how federal law enforcement might respond to similar actions by different groups (Antifa vs Proud Boys) [1]

Legal & Political - Washington DC sues Trump administration over National Guard deployment [1] - The lawsuit alleges the use of troops without local leaders' consent violates federal law [1]

Legal & Regulatory - A judge ruled that Trump's Los Angeles takeover violated federal law [1]