Federal Reserve Board
Search documents
White House responds to Supreme Court allowing Fed's Lisa Cook to keep job for now
CNBC Television· 2025-10-01 16:39
Federal Reserve & Supreme Court Decision - The Supreme Court allowed Lisa Cook to stay on the Federal Reserve Board [1] - The White House asserts it lawfully removed Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors for cause [1][2] - Oral arguments before the Supreme Court are expected in January [1] - The Supreme Court decision on Lisa Cook could take months after oral arguments [4] - Lisa Cook has a 14-year term [5] Market Implications - The market might prefer continuity on the Federal Reserve Board [6] - The market might be happy with the outcome of Lisa Cook staying on the board in the short term [6] Legal & Political Considerations - The Supreme Court case raises questions about the President's authority and the independence of the Federal Reserve [3] - The case is a test of the Fed's independence from presidential political pressure [3]
White House responds to Supreme Court decision on Fed Governor Lisa Cook
CNBC Television· 2025-10-01 16:30
Federal Reserve & Legal Dispute - The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in January regarding Lisa Cook's position on the Federal Reserve Board [1][2] - The core of the legal battle revolves around the definition of "for cause" in relation to the President's authority and the independence of the Federal Reserve [3] - A decision from the Supreme Court on Lisa Cook's case could take months after the oral arguments [4] - Lisa Cook has a 14-year term, potentially leading to prolonged legal proceedings [4] White House Stance - The White House maintains that President Trump lawfully removed Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board "for cause" [1] - The White House anticipates ultimate victory after presenting oral arguments before the Supreme Court [1] Potential Implications - The Supreme Court's decision could set a precedent regarding the Federal Reserve's independence from presidential political pressure [3] - The case represents a significant test of the Fed's existence as an independent body [3]
X @Decrypt
Decrypt· 2025-09-16 11:45
Senate Confirms Trump Adviser Stephen Miran to Federal Reserve Board in Narrow Vote► https://t.co/XPtHwBQxiQ https://t.co/XPtHwBQxiQ ...
The market only wants to hear good news right now, says Fmr. Fed Chair Alan Blinder
CNBC Television· 2025-09-11 16:02
Fed Independence Concerns - The market may be underreacting to a serious threat to the Federal Reserve's independence, potentially the most significant in many years [8][9] - Concerns exist regarding the expedited passage of Steven Moran into the Federal Reserve Board while still on leave from the White House staff, raising conflict of interest issues [3][4] - The unprecedented nature of having someone simultaneously serve on the White House staff (on leave) and the Federal Reserve Board is highlighted [6] - The market's current euphoria may be overshadowing concerns about Fed independence [10] Personnel and Policy - A lawsuit is ongoing regarding Lisa Cook's appointment [3] - There are concerns about the President's influence on the Fed through appointments and "jaw boning" around Fed Chair Powell [2] - The temporary nature of a potential appointment doesn't negate concerns about potential influence or future re-hiring by the White House [5]
Fed Gov nominee Miran: Independence of monetary policy is critical for its success
CNBC Television· 2025-09-03 17:58
All right, welcome back to the exchange. We've got breaking news out of Washington DC. Steve Leeman has that story.Steve, Dom, thanks. We have the opening statement for Steven Meyer. He is the candidate for a Federal Reserve job uh that is open right now.And he is going to say that independence of monetary policy is critical for its success. He pledges or he says he intends to preserve the independence of the Fed. That is a obviously a question when it comes to uh appointees of President Trump to the Federa ...
Trump Says National Guard Can Fix the 'Mess' in Chicago
Bloomberg Television· 2025-08-28 19:33
National Guard Deployment & Legal Basis - The deployment of the National Guard is being framed as addressing lawlessness, referencing the historical concept of "Posse Comitatus" [1] - The President's authority to deploy the National Guard, especially in Democratic-controlled cities, is questioned as potentially a political move rather than a necessity to fight crime [2][4] - The use of federal Title 32 orders for National Guard deployment in Washington D C raises concerns about the appropriateness of using armed troops not trained in police work in civilian settings [5][6][7] - Governors are pushing back against the deployment of troops in their states, raising potential legal challenges and invoking historical parallels to the Civil War [9][10][11] - The use of the National Guard is contrasted with historical examples like the Civil Rights Movement, where there was a clear federal interest in enforcing constitutional rights [13] Federal Reserve Independence - The President's attempt to influence or remove a Federal Reserve governor is seen as a challenge to the Fed's independence and a potential overreach of executive power [15][16][17] - The Federal Reserve was created as an independent agency to insulate monetary policy from political pressures that could harm the economy [18][19][20] - The debate over the President's power over the Federal Reserve raises constitutional questions about the balance of power and the role of independent agencies [20][21][24] - The Supreme Court's stance on the independence of the Federal Reserve is being scrutinized, particularly in light of past rulings on other independent boards [25][26][27] - Maintaining an independent central bank is considered crucial for the stability of the US economy and the attractiveness of the US dollar as a global investment [28] Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement - The President's suggestion of the death penalty for murderers in Washington D C is met with skepticism regarding its effectiveness as a deterrent and its potential application to other cases [29][30][31] - The presence of federal agencies like ICE and DEA at checkpoints in Washington D C raises questions about priorities and resource allocation, especially given crises in other areas like the Arizona-Mexico border [32][36] - Individuals have constitutional rights when encountering law enforcement checkpoints, including the right to remain silent, but asserting those rights may have consequences [33][34][35]
What to Understand About Trump Weighing Extending Influence to Fed Banks
Bloomberg Television· 2025-08-26 21:27
Federal Reserve Governance & Influence - The President's potential ousting of Governor Cook could create another vacancy on the Fed board, allowing for another presidential appointment [1] - Currently, there are two Republican appointees on the seven-member Fed board, with a third nomination pending [1] - If another governor steps down, the President could potentially secure a majority (four out of seven) on the Fed board [2] - A majority on the Fed board could potentially support the President's push for lower interest rates [2] Regional Bank Oversight - The Fed board has the authority to reauthorize the 12 regional bank presidents every 5 years [4] - The administration might consider exerting pressure on regional bank presidents through board members aligned with their views, particularly regarding interest rate policies [4] - This scenario is hypothetical but is being considered by administration officials [5]
Kaplan Cautions Fed Against Cutting Rates in September
Bloomberg Television· 2025-08-21 20:34
Federal Reserve & Monetary Policy - The Fed's members must work without political considerations to make the best judgments [2] - The FOMC consists of governors and Fed presidents, requiring consensus-building rather than individual decisions [6][7] - The Fed is balancing sluggish job market and GDP growth with above-target inflation, primarily in services [9] - The debate within the Fed centers on whether to prioritize inflation or the labor market side of the dual mandate [11][12] - A strong August jobs number could reduce the likelihood of action at the September meeting [12] - The debate is about the risk of not meeting either side of the dual mandate [12] Inflation & Economic Data - Approximately 80 million workers in the US making $50,000 or less have lost over 25% of purchasing power in the last five years [14] - The Fed should aim for a 2% headline inflation rate, especially for low and moderate-income workers [14][15] - Consumers can substitute goods for services, with goods representing about 25% of the US economy and services 75% [17] - The Beige Book is a critical part of the Fed's process, providing valuable anecdotal insights from businesses across the country [20][21] - Over-reliance on any single data print should be avoided, focusing instead on three-to-six-month trends [23][24]