And joining us now first on CNBC before the earnings call is Jacob Dit, Oklahoma co-founder and CEO. Jacob, welcome. First, for how should investors think about this company.It seems based on the uh structure. It's almost like a a gold mine or a biotech in the sense that you're reliant on certain approvals, but then if it works out, it works out really big. Yeah, it's an interesting question and thanks for having me on and happy Veterans Day to everyone.I think I think it's it's one of those dynamics where ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company's first quarter operating loss was $17.9 million, including non-cash stock-based compensation of $2.3 million [34] - Loss before income taxes was $14.2 million, reflecting an operating loss adjusted for net interest income of $3.6 million [34] - Cash used in operating activities was $12.2 million, with a full-year guidance of $65 million to $80 million for total cash used in operations [34] - At the end of the quarter, cash and marketable securities totaled $260.7 million [35] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is advancing steadily toward commercial deployment, having completed a major milestone in preparing the INL site for the Aurora Powerhouse [15] - The customer pipeline totaled over 14 gigawatts, spanning sectors like data centers and defense, indicating strong and growing demand [35] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The current administration has made nuclear energy a strategic priority, with executive orders supporting regulatory reform and streamlined permitting for nuclear projects [4][5] - The administration is considering new executive orders to quadruple the size of the U.S. nuclear fleet by 2050, which aligns with the company's mission [7] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company’s competitive advantage is based on a build-own-operate business model, small-scale modern design, and proven technology [9][10] - The company aims to bring its first commercial unit online in late 2027 to early 2028, focusing on delivering a commercial powerhouse rather than a demonstration plant [12] - The company is also pursuing partnerships to support technology development and deployment of POWERHOUSE and radioisotope assets [15] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the alignment of federal support for nuclear energy with the company's mission, highlighting the administration's commitment to advanced nuclear technologies [8] - The company is optimistic about its regulatory strategy and the potential for faster licensing pathways, which will support its commercialization goals [22] Other Important Information - The company acquired Atomic Alchemy to expand its reach into the high-growth radioisotope market, which is expected to drive near-term revenue and long-term market leadership [25] - The company is actively developing a fuel recycling program, which is expected to provide a significant cost and commercialization advantage [23] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you talk about the regulatory authority for nuclear power that the DoD has today? - The DoD has the authority to regulate nuclear plants for their use cases, and there is potential for them to accelerate reactor deployments through programs like ANPI [40] Question: Can you give us an update on other parts of the supply chain and your confidence in commencing construction? - The company is leveraging existing supply chains and is focused on fuel as the main challenge, but is optimistic about breaking ground soon [44][46] Question: When might you start taking delivery of fuel from the fuel MOU with Centrus? - The first fuel for the initial plant is allocated from government reserves, while commercial procurement will happen for subsequent plants [53][57] Question: Will additional capital be needed given the larger reactor size and growth needed for Atomic Alchemy? - The balance sheet has adequate capital for the deployment of INL, but the company will raise capital strategically if needed [66][67] Question: What does the NRC process look like for the Viper facility? - The licensing process for the Viper facility is simpler and more straightforward than for power reactors, benefiting from a two-step process [70] Question: Is the company more confident about the licensing process as it approaches the submission of the COLA? - The company has had extensive engagement with the NRC and is optimistic about the efficiency and effectiveness of the licensing process [86][88]