Okay, so Homeland Security Secretary Christy Gnome is out with a new video and it's causing some mixed reactions. Democrats in Congress refuse to fund the federal government and because of this, many of our operations are impacted and most of our TSA employees are working without pay. The Department of Homeland Security is asking airports to play that clip near security lines, but not everyone's on board.Some airports in New York, Nevada, New Jersey, and Oregon say they won't do it. A few of them releasing ...

Political Climate & Social Issues - The report highlights a polarized political environment characterized by an "us vs them" mentality, reminiscent of the Trump administration's worldview [1][2] - The report discusses the controversy surrounding the denial of communion to priests and the perceived hypocrisy of some administration officials who publicly display their religious beliefs but allegedly contradict church teachings [3][4][5][6] - The report mentions instances of ICE raids and the moral dilemmas faced by everyday Americans in deciding whether to shelter undocumented immigrants [22][23][24] Resistance & Opposition - The report notes the emergence of resistance against certain policies, including the Catholic Church's increased involvement and Pope Francis's call for a more aggressive stance on social issues [11][12][13] - The report mentions a "No Kings" rally, framed as an opportunity to reclaim American values and Christianity from MAGA [12][13] - The report highlights instances of collective action, such as news organizations rejecting restrictions on Pentagon access and airports refusing to play a politically charged video [25][26][27][14][15][16][17][18] Government Actions & Ethical Concerns - The report raises concerns about the use of government resources for political purposes, citing a video from DHS Secretary Christy Gnome played at airports [14][15][16][17][18] - The report questions the accountability of government officials regarding potential violations of the Hatch Act [20][21]

you know, this is a development. Uh, but it also would explain uh to me at least why the White House and House Republicans are working to such great lengths to bury the Epstein files like a mile beneath the earth. I mean, it it looks like they're blackmailed being blackmailed, right. I mean, we're we're in a Epstein shutdown right now.I went to Washington earlier this week and the doors to the capital were closed because they don't want to swear in a member of Congress who will be the 218th signature that w ...

A new letter that I got this morning, it's sent by the House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia. This is first here on MSNBC and it alleges a potential violation of the Hatch Act by the federal government for its posting of political messaging on government websites accusing Democrats of shutting down the government. This is not the typical kind of messaging that we see agencies sending, that we see agencies posting publicly. But what's your take on this attempt to try to get the administratio ...

Legal & Political Analysis - The report discusses an investigation into Jack Smith for potential violations of the Hatch Act, a civil statute prohibiting certain federal employees from engaging in political activity [1][3] - The investigation is perceived by some as a retaliatory measure by the Trump administration [4] - Concerns are raised about the investigation being a "witch hunt" aimed at interfering with elections [2] - There is an expectation that the investigation may not be successful and could provide Jack Smith with a platform to defend his actions [5] Risk Assessment - The report suggests the Trump administration may be opening itself up to scrutiny regarding past Hatch Act violations [3] - The investigation could backfire, giving Jack Smith an opportunity to publicly justify his team's actions [5]

Legal and Political Analysis - The report suggests a potential pattern of retaliatory investigations against those who have investigated or criticized Donald Trump [2][5][7] - A probe has been launched into Special Counsel Jack Smith, who indicted Donald Trump, by an independent agency responding to Republican politicians' claims of political motivation [3][4] - The investigation into Smith is considered unusual for an office responsible for looking into federal employees' violations of prohibited personnel practices [7] - Legal experts view the investigation as suspicious and potentially a distraction, even though it is currently a civil matter and not a criminal probe [14][18] Trump's Actions and Implications - Trump has expressed a desire for revenge and indicated he might use governmental powers to target his prosecutors if he were to win office [2] - Trump pardoned individuals convicted in connection with the January 6th insurrection, further aligning himself with their actions [1][12] - Trump faces felony charges related to national security laws, conspiracy to obstruct justice, defraud the United States, disenfranchise voters, and obstruct an official proceeding [9] Historical Context and Parallels - The report draws a parallel to non-democratic regimes where leaders control justice departments to prosecute enemies [3] - The Mueller probe is referenced as a prior investigation into Trump, which did not lead to an indictment but did implicate several individuals [1] - Mark Meadows' past statement about disregarding the Hatch Act is cited to highlight the irony of the current administration investigating Hatch Act violations [17]

Legal & Regulatory Scrutiny - The US Office of Special Counsel is investigating former special counsel Jack Smith for alleged violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits certain political activities by government officials [1] - The investigation follows repeated arguments from Trump and his allies that Smith's investigations constituted illegal political activity [2] - As of the report, Trump and his allies have not presented specific evidence of wrongdoing [2] Key Figures & Investigations - Jack Smith oversaw multiple criminal investigations against Trump, including Trump's handling of classified documents and actions related to January 6th [1]

Legal & Political Investigations - The US Office of Special Counsel is investigating former special counsel Jack Smith for alleged Hatch Act violations, which prohibits certain political activities by government officials [1] - Trump and his allies have argued that Smith's investigations constituted illegal political activity, but have not presented specific evidence [2] - A 2021 report concluded that around a dozen people, including Mark Meadows, had Hatch Act violations [14] - One way there could be a violation is if Jack Smith timed his legal and procedural activities to interfere with an election [15] Political Strategy & Public Perception - Some analysts believe the investigation is a distraction from pressing issues like the economy, child care, and international affairs [6][7] - Concerns exist that such actions undermine the rule of law and could be perceived as a "kangaroo court" [5][8] - Analysts suggest that constant distractions and perceived injustices could lead to voter apathy, especially among younger voters [11][12] - The Hatch Act investigation is viewed by some as a "troll" and not a serious matter, while others worry about the long-term implications for the country's reputation [15][16]

And Senator Padilla joins us now. He's a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. >> Senator, thanks for joining us.We know the Office of Special Counsel this White House submitted a new name to lead up that office, a Trump loyalist, some may say stick. Do you really believe that the office of special counsel under this administration would do an investigation into this. Look, I know there's questions and whether they may or may not actually do the job of investigating, which by the way, they have confirme ...