Housing Investment
Search documents
Two Simple Ways To Invest $1,500 A Month In Housing, And Where You Could Be In A Decade
Benzinga· 2026-01-26 17:15
Core Insights - The current economic environment in 2026 necessitates a more nuanced approach to housing investment, focusing on risk management, cash accessibility, and long-term financial goals rather than a simple rent vs. buy debate [1][27] Housing Market Overview - Home prices in the U.S. remain high relative to incomes, and mortgage interest rates have increased significantly since the pandemic, altering family perspectives on home buying [2] - Despite these challenges, housing continues to be a critical avenue for wealth accumulation and a reliable long-term asset [2] Investment Strategies - Investors are encouraged to consider whether to invest in housing through mortgage REITs or by paying down their own home mortgage, as both options are influenced by the housing economy but differ in risk and returns [3][6] - A monthly contribution of $1,500 is used as a benchmark for comparing these two investment paths, leading to a total contribution of $180,000 over ten years [5] Path One: Mortgage REITs - Mortgage REITs allow investment in the financing side of housing, focusing on mortgages and mortgage-backed securities rather than physical properties [7][8] - Investing in mortgage REITs offers liquidity, diversification, and regular income through dividends, but is sensitive to interest rate changes and economic downturns [9][10] - Historical returns for mortgage REITs range from 6% to 10% annually, with a conservative estimate suggesting a portfolio value of approximately $245,000 to $260,000 after ten years with consistent investment and reinvestment of dividends [11][12] Path Two: Home Equity - Home equity grows through mortgage repayment, property value appreciation, and inflation effects, leveraging borrowed money to control a larger asset [15][18] - A typical scenario involves purchasing a $400,000 home with a 10% down payment, leading to an estimated home equity of about $225,000 after ten years, assuming a 3% annual appreciation rate [19] - Homeownership entails hidden costs such as maintenance, taxes, and insurance, which can diminish overall returns [20] Comparative Analysis - After ten years, both investment paths yield similar financial outcomes, with mortgage REITs potentially offering higher nominal cash balances due to uninterrupted compounding, while home equity benefits from leverage and inflation hedging [22] - The key difference lies in the nature of risk; mortgage REITs exhibit daily volatility, while home value fluctuations are less apparent until a sale or refinance occurs [23] Investor Suitability - Mortgage REITs are suited for investors seeking flexibility and diversification, comfortable with market volatility [25] - Home equity is ideal for those planning to stay in one location long-term, willing to accept higher initial costs and illiquidity for the benefits of leverage and forced savings [26] Conclusion - Consistent investment in the housing sector can be structured through various strategies, each aligning with different risk tolerances and financial goals, emphasizing the importance of method selection in accessing the housing market [27]
Ramit Sethi says advice from Dave Ramsey and Kevin O’Leary is outdated. Here’s what you should focus on
Yahoo Finance· 2025-12-31 13:15
Core Insights - The shift from traditional pensions to individual retirement savings has placed the retirement burden on employees, making it increasingly difficult for them to achieve financial stability [1][6][4] - Current financial advice from prominent figures like Dave Ramsey and Kevin O'Leary is considered outdated, as it does not account for modern economic realities such as high housing costs and the lack of pensions [4][5][6] - Younger generations are facing significant challenges in home ownership and financial security, with a notable percentage feeling financially insecure compared to previous generations [5][6] Group 1: Economic Shifts - Companies have largely moved away from offering pensions, with only 15% of private industry workers having access to defined benefit plans in 2023 [6] - The disappearance of traditional pensions has made it harder for workers to achieve the American Dream, as indicated by over three-quarters of survey respondents [6] - Boomers hold an estimated $18 to $19 trillion in real estate, benefiting from policies that made home ownership affordable, which is no longer the case for younger generations [6][7] Group 2: Financial Advice and Strategies - Prominent financial advisors' frameworks are criticized for being outdated and not applicable to the current economic landscape [4][5] - Sethi suggests that young people should focus on earning more, saving consistently, and making conscious financial choices rather than adhering to fear-based budgeting [9][10][11] - Automating savings and investments is emphasized as a key strategy for building wealth through compounding [10]
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-24 23:20
Ireland’s economy is set to grow more than previously expected on rising government spending and housing investment, the Economic and Social Research Institute said, as it warned about potential overheating https://t.co/rNGqyQMm2M ...