What have we learned about how it is the president is communicating, gaining classified information from, guidance from, assessment from his top intelligence officials. >> Well, uh, Radcliffe did answer a question today. It was interesting.He was asked, "How often do you does the president get an intelligence briefing?" Radcliffe today said,"Well, you know, I might brief the president on a particular issue or or some intelligence matter maybe up to 14 or 15 times a week." And he said, "Maybe sometimes it's ...

MS NOW'S KEN DELANIAN FROM WASHINGTON, D .C. , AND MS NOW'S DAVID ROAD IS HERE ON SET. SO, DAVID, WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF HOW TULSI GABBARD ANSWERED THAT QUESTION WHEN SHE WAS PUSHED.AND SHE'S NOT THE ONLY. SHE GOT NUMEROUS SHE WAS ABLE TO GET THEIR QUESTIONS FROM NUMEROUS MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE BUT PUSHED ON THE INTELLIGENCE THAT THE PRESIDENT HAD, THAT THE U .S. HAD SURROUNDING THE WAR IN IRAN.SHE EVADED THE ANSWERS, AND LOOK, THESE ARE DIFFICULT HEARINGS, AGAIN, FOR OFFICIALS. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE APOLI ...

🚨LATEST: US INTEL DOUBTS WAR WOULD OUST IRAN REGIMEA classified U.S. intelligence assessment says military action would likely fail to remove Iran’s ruling establishment, according to The Washington Post.The report was prepared by the National Intelligence Council.Officials concluded even a large-scale campaign may not topple the system. Iran’s clerical and military structures are considered deeply entrenched.Analysts also doubt opposition forces could quickly take power. The findings come as the United Sta ...

Political Interference & Intelligence Assessment - The report suggests the Trump administration and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are attempting to shift focus by rehashing claims about Russian interference in the 2016 election [1][4] - The report indicates Gabbard's presentation lacked substantial new evidence, relying on cherry-picked information to support existing grievances [4] - The report highlights that previous investigations, including a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee review and a Justice Department investigation, found no political interference [3][5] - The report points out the difference between hacking voter systems and the Kremlin's influence campaign using social media and propaganda [7][8] Credibility & Motivation - The report questions Gabbard's motives, suggesting she may be trying to regain favor with President Trump after previous disagreements on intelligence assessments [9] - The report implies Gabbard's intelligence assessments were perceived negatively by Trump, leading her to seek ways to demonstrate loyalty [9]