Midstream energy
Search documents
3 Oil Pipeline MLP Stocks Shining Despite Industry Headwinds
ZACKS· 2026-02-03 14:05
Industry Overview - The Zacks Oil and Gas - Pipeline MLP industry consists of master limited partnerships that transport oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products, and natural gas liquids in North America, generating stable fee-based revenues from transportation and storage assets [3] - The industry is currently facing a gloomy outlook due to conservative spending by exploration and production companies, which is expected to reduce demand for transportation and storage assets [1][6] Financial Metrics - The industry has a high debt-to-capitalization ratio of 56.6%, indicating that borrowing is common for financing large infrastructure projects, which may limit financial flexibility [4] - The current trailing 12-month enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio for the industry is 11.01X, lower than the S&P 500's 19.05X but above the sector's 5.95X [14] Market Performance - The Zacks Oil and Gas - Pipeline MLP industry has underperformed the broader Zacks Oil - Energy sector and the S&P 500 over the past year, declining by 7.8% compared to the sector's 14.8% gain and the S&P 500's 17.3% rise [10] Future Challenges - The industry is expected to face challenges from a shift to renewable energy, which may lower demand for pipeline and storage networks for oil and natural gas [5] - Oil and gas exploration and production companies are under pressure to prioritize stockholder returns over production growth, negatively impacting the demand for pipeline and storage assets [6] Key Players - Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) has a robust business model with a pipeline network exceeding 50,000 miles, generating stable fee-based revenues and returning capital to unitholders consistently [17][18] - Energy Transfer LP (ET) operates a vast pipeline network of 125,000 miles, generating stable revenues and is projected to see earnings growth of 17% this year [20][21] - Plains All American Pipeline LP (PAA) benefits from stable fee-based revenues through its pipeline network and storage assets, with recent upward earnings estimate revisions [23]
ET vs. KMI: Which Midstream Stock Has More Upside Potential for Now?
ZACKS· 2025-11-26 16:16
Core Insights - The Zacks Oil and Gas Production and Pipeline industry is crucial for meeting global energy demands, driven by economic growth and rising demand in emerging markets [1] - Innovations in drilling and recovery methods are enhancing production efficiency and increasing the need for midstream services [1] Industry Overview - Pipeline networks are essential for the efficient transportation of crude oil, natural gas, and refined products, providing stable cash flows through long-term agreements [2] - The demand for midstream infrastructure is expected to grow due to increased shale output in North America and the expanding role of natural gas in electricity production [2] Company Comparisons - Energy Transfer (ET) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) are two leading midstream energy companies in North America, operating extensive pipeline and storage networks [3] - ET has a diversified midstream network and is well-positioned to benefit from rising U.S. energy output and global demand, supported by steady cash flows and capital management [4] - KMI offers a stable investment backed by its natural gas-focused midstream system, ensuring consistent cash flows through long-term agreements [5] Earnings Growth Projections - ET's earnings per unit are projected to grow by 7.03% in 2025 and 15.82% in 2026, with a long-term growth rate of 12.45% [7] - KMI's earnings per share are expected to grow by 10.43% in 2025 and 5.12% in 2026, with a long-term growth rate of 8.95% [10] Financial Metrics - ET has a return on equity (ROE) of 10.71%, outperforming KMI's 8.57% [12] - ET's debt-to-capital ratio is 58.19%, compared to KMI's 50.42%, indicating both companies are utilizing higher debt levels [16] - ET's dividend yield is 8.07%, significantly higher than KMI's 4.36% [17] Valuation - ET is trading at a forward P/E of 10.57X, while KMI is at 20.14X, making ET appear more attractive on a valuation basis [18] Conclusion - ET is positioned as a more compelling investment option compared to KMI, with stronger earnings projections, higher dividend payouts, and a more attractive valuation [20]