Welcome back. We are following breaking news out of the Supreme Court which has just blocked the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard in Illinois. The justices rejecting the White House's claim that the troops were needed to protect federal agents carrying out immigration enforcement, particularly in and around the Chicago area.The decision represents a rare defeat for this administration by this conservativeleaning court. Joining me now is NBC News senior Supreme Court reporter Lawrence H ...

We have some breaking news we want to get to out of Washington DC. A Secret Service spokesman tells MS Now that two National Guard members were involved in a shooting near the White House this afternoon. At least one of them was struck and the White House is currently on lockdown.Joining us, MS Now justice and intelligence reporter Ken Delaney and along with MS Now national security and intelligence analyst and former FBI supervisor Rob Demo. So Ken, what what exactly do we know. Uh basically just what you ...

Tonight, millions of Americans who rely on the government for assistance living in limbo as the government shutdown drags on. In a late Friday night order, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a lower court decision that had ordered the Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefit payments by Friday. That stay from the high court means for now the administration can withhold about $4 billion in SNAP benefits.Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins praised the order. You can't just create money to fund a p ...

Legal & Political - Federal judge extends order blocking Trump from deploying National Guard to Portland [1] - The order keeps soldiers in limbo as legal showdown continues [1]

Legal & Political Landscape - Federal judge extends order blocking Trump from deploying National Guard to Portland [1] - Soldiers remain in limbo as legal showdown continues [1]

National Guard Deployment & Legal Challenges - The Pentagon has ordered the training of over 23,000 National Guard troops for civil unrest missions nationwide [1] - National Guard deployments have occurred in five US cities, sparking legal challenges from Democratic governors [3] - A federal judge is set to rule on the constitutionality of troop deployment in Portland, Oregon, with a likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals [4] - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering the deployment of the National Guard to Oregon [11] Insurrection Act & Presidential Authority - The president is signaling a potential workaround by invoking the Insurrection Act [4] - The president's insistence on normalizing the use of the US military on American streets is viewed as unusual and potentially unconstitutional [7][8] - Democratic attorneys general are prepared to challenge any presidential workaround in court to uphold American values [9] - Concerns exist that the president may invoke the Insurrection Act if legal challenges to troop deployments fail [18][19] Food Emergency & SNAP Benefits - Oregon's governor declared a food emergency, directing $5 million to food banks due to federal shutdown cuts to SNAP benefits [23] - 177% of Oregon's population relies on SNAP benefits, according to USDA numbers from 2024 [23] - Concerns are raised that the president may use the food emergency to disproportionately harm Democrats [24]

Legal & Political Conflict - The report highlights a dispute between California Governor Gavin Newsom and the Trump administration regarding the deployment of federal agents and the National Guard to San Francisco [1][2][3] - The core legal question revolves around the President's authority to deploy the National Guard over the objection of a state governor, particularly concerning the interpretation of an emergency statute related to rebellion, foreign invasion, or inability to enforce federal laws [5][6] - The Department of Justice argues the deployment falls within presidential authority, while Newsom challenges this, leading to court proceedings and potential Supreme Court involvement [4][13][14] - The central issue is who has the power to decide when the deployment of the National Guard is warranted – the President alone or with court oversight [13][14] Potential Consequences - The outcome of the legal battle could significantly impact the balance between state sovereignty and federal power, determining the extent of presidential authority in deploying the National Guard across the country [11][14][15] - The court's skepticism towards the administration's argument suggests a potential limitation on the President's power to unilaterally deploy the National Guard for issues that might be considered within the purview of local law enforcement [8][9][10][11] - The administration seeks Supreme Court intervention, indicating the high stakes and potential for a definitive ruling on states' rights versus federal rights [13]

Protests and Federal Response - National Guard deployment is likely at the Portland ICE facility due to ongoing protests [1][5] - Protests are centered around the ICE facility, which processes individuals in the country illegally [3] - Demonstrators express that no amount of force will deter them from protesting [5] Facility Operations and Regulations - The ICE facility was intended to hold individuals for 12 hours [3] - City officials allege that ICE officers violated the land use agreement associated with leasing the facility [3] Claims and Counter-Claims - The President claims the city is "burning down," but counter-narratives portray Portland as peaceful [1][2] - ICE officials have reportedly fired munitions, including rubber bullets [3] - Protesters have allegedly used commercial fireworks, contributing to the tension [4] Aftermath and Cleanup - Vandalism and graffiti have occurred at the facility, requiring power washing [4] - A response team cleans up trash left by demonstrators [4]

Legal & Political - A federal judge extends the order blocking the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago [1] News & Updates - Breaking news regarding the National Guard deployment situation in Chicago [1]

Legal & Judicial Analysis - The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Trump administration can deploy Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, dismissing a lower court's order [1][2] - A dissenting judge argued the ruling erodes constitutional principles, including states' control over militias and First Amendment rights [3] - An unnamed judge requested a rehearing by the full panel of judges on the Ninth Circuit [3] - The Supreme Court could issue a narrow decision applying only to Illinois regarding the deployment of National Guard troops [7] Political Implications - The ruling emboldens the Trump administration's efforts to deploy National Guard troops to states despite opposition from state leaders [4][5] - Republican governors from Oklahoma and Vermont expressed concerns about a Democratic president sending National Guard troops into their states [5] - The White House did not immediately respond to whether troops would be sent to Portland following the ruling [6][11] - The administration believes the president has broad authority, potentially considering the Insurrection Act [13] State & Federal Conflict - Oregon and Illinois governors are expected to continue fighting the administration's deployment of troops [9] - A Trump-appointed judge initially ruled that the president's claims of violence in Portland were exaggerated [1][12]