Core Viewpoint - Ken Fisher argues that price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios are not as critical for predicting stock market performance as commonly believed, suggesting that high valuations may not significantly hinder market returns [1][4][8] Group 1: Valuation Debate - The current debate centers around whether stocks are overvalued, with many analysts pointing to the S&P 500's P/E ratio being significantly above its 5-year and 10-year averages, indicating potential underperformance [2][3][7] - Fisher's perspective challenges the conventional wisdom that high P/E ratios signal an impending market correction, proposing instead that this belief may have caused investors to miss out on recent market rallies [4][5] Group 2: Historical Context - Fisher, with over 30 years of market experience, emphasizes that valuation is a minor factor in determining stock direction, supported by over a century of historical data [5][7][8] - The S&P 500's trailing 12-month P/E ratio is currently at 28.3, which is above the 5-year average of 25 and the 10-year average of 22.9, yet Fisher maintains that these figures do not predict future stock movements [6][7]

The winning $ETH DATs will be valued based on P/E ratios down the line.Kyle Reidhead | Milk Road (@KyleReidhead):$SBET at $10 is hilariousThey own $2.77B worth of $ETH and generate $88m annualized from staking....yet are valued at $2BThey've also built one of the most impressive teams in all of crypto with @ethereumJoseph and @joechalom leading the wayunless you think $ETH is going https://t.co/xVBFmEaNL6 ...