Workflow
Real Estate ETFs
icon
Search documents
GQRE vs. ICF: A Matchup of Two Real Estate ETFs
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-19 16:00
Core Insights - The iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF) has lower costs and has outperformed over five years compared to the FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE), which offers global diversification and a higher yield at a higher fee [1][4]. Cost and Size Comparison - ICF has an expense ratio of 0.32%, while GQRE has a higher expense ratio of 0.46% [3]. - As of March 16, 2026, ICF's one-year return is 4.2%, compared to GQRE's 6.4% [3]. - ICF offers a dividend yield of 2.7%, while GQRE provides a higher yield of 4.5% [3]. - ICF has a total assets under management (AUM) of $2.0 billion, significantly larger than GQRE's $355.0 million [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over five years, ICF experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.75%, while GQRE had a slightly higher drawdown of -35.08% [5]. - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years would result in $1,117 for ICF and $1,013 for GQRE [5]. Fund Composition - GQRE tracks a global real estate index with 219 securities and a strict quality overlay, maintaining a 100% real estate allocation [6]. - ICF focuses solely on the U.S. real estate sector with only 30 holdings, primarily large, established REITs such as Equinix, Welltower, and American Tower [7]. Investor Implications - Real estate ETFs like ICF and GQRE provide average investors with opportunities to add real estate exposure to their portfolios [8]. - ICF's lower expense ratio and higher AUM make it more accessible for investors, particularly those focused on the U.S. market [9].
REET Delivers a Higher Yield, But ICF Provides Greater Exposure to the U.S. REIT Market
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-18 16:06
Core Insights - iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) provides broader global exposure and lower fees compared to iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF), which focuses on a concentrated U.S. REIT lineup with higher volatility and lower yields [1][2] Cost & Size Comparison - REET has an expense ratio of 0.14%, while ICF charges 0.32%, making REET the more cost-effective option [3][4] - As of March 16, 2026, REET's 1-year return is 6.5% compared to ICF's 4.2% [3] - REET offers a dividend yield of 3.5%, higher than ICF's 2.7% [4] - REET has assets under management (AUM) of $4.6 billion, significantly larger than ICF's $2.0 billion [3] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, REET's maximum drawdown is -32.14%, while ICF's is -34.75% [5] - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $1,004 in REET and $1,117 in ICF over five years [5] Portfolio Composition - ICF consists of 30 U.S. real estate investment trusts, focusing solely on the U.S. market with top holdings including Equinix Reit Inc, Welltower Inc, and American Tower Reit Corp [6] - REET holds 325 assets across developed and emerging markets, providing a diverse range of property types and geographies, with top positions including Welltower Inc, Prologis Reit Inc, and Equinix Reit Inc [7] Investment Implications - Investors often diversify their portfolios by including real estate components, and real estate ETFs like REET and ICF are popular choices for this purpose [8]