NEW YORK, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ:SOUN) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against SoundHound on March 28, 2025 with a Class Period from May 10, 2024 and March 3, 2025. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of SoundHound have breached their fiduciary duties to the company. Accor ...

Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against Edison International due to a class action complaint alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by the board of directors [1] Group 1: Allegations and Claims - The class action complaint alleges that Edison made false and misleading statements regarding its Public Safety Power Shutoffs program, claiming it was used to mitigate wildfire risks, which was found to be false [2] - The complaint states that the misleading claims resulted in increased fire risk in California and heightened legal exposure for Edison [2] - As a result of these misleading statements, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages when the true information became public [2] Group 2: Legal Representation - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is representing long-term stockholders of Edison and is seeking information related to the claims [3] - The firm emphasizes that there is no cost or obligation for stockholders to inquire about their rights or interests regarding these matters [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with expertise in representing individual and institutional investors in complex litigation [4] - The firm operates in both New York and California, handling cases in state and federal courts across the country [4]

Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against Fluence Energy, Inc. due to a class action complaint alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by the board of directors during a specified class period [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that during the class period, Fluence made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its relationships with major revenue sources, Siemens AG and The AES Corporation [2] - Specific allegations include accusations from Siemens Energy regarding engineering failures and fraud, as well as inflated margins and revenue growth due to impending divestitures by Siemens and AES [2] - The lawsuit asserts that the defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about Fluence's battery energy storage business and financial prospects, leading to investor damages when the truth emerged [2] Group 2: Contact Information - Long-term stockholders of Fluence are encouraged to reach out for more information regarding the claims or their rights, with contact details provided for Brandon Walker and Marion Passmore [3]