Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) represent two distinct approaches to investing in U.S. growth stocks, with MGK focusing on large-cap stocks and IWO on small-cap stocks, leading to different risk and diversification profiles [1] Cost & Size - MGK has an expense ratio of 0.05% and assets under management (AUM) of $32 billion, while IWO has a higher expense ratio of 0.24% and AUM of $13 billion [2] - The one-year return for MGK is 12.81%, compared to IWO's 14.61%, and the dividend yield for MGK is 0.36%, while IWO offers a yield of 0.54% [2] - The beta over five years for MGK is 1.17, indicating lower volatility compared to IWO's beta of 1.43 [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over five years, MGK has a maximum drawdown of -36.02%, while IWO has a higher drawdown of -42.02% [3] - An investment of $1,000 in MGK would have grown to $1,846, whereas the same investment in IWO would have grown to $1,039 [3] Portfolio Composition - IWO tracks over 1,000 small-cap U.S. stocks, with significant allocations in healthcare (26%), technology (22%), and industrials (22%), providing broad diversification [4] - MGK is concentrated in 60 mega-cap stocks, with nearly 55% in technology and 17% in communication services, leading to less diversification [5] Investment Implications - MGK's narrow portfolio limits diversification but focuses on industry leaders, which may recover from volatility [6] - IWO offers greater variety but is subject to higher volatility due to its small-cap focus [7] - Historical performance shows IWO has greater volatility and a steeper max drawdown, but MGK has outperformed IWO over five years due to the growth of its top holdings [8] - Investors seeking diversification may prefer IWO, while those targeting mega-cap exposure might favor MGK [9]

Core Insights - Lee Financial Co. initiated a new stake in iShares Trust - iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (NASDAQ: IJT), acquiring 55,677 shares valued at approximately $7.86 million [1][2] - This new position represents 1.06% of Lee Financial's total reportable U.S. equity assets of $741.18 million as of December 31, 2025 [2] - The ETF has a total return of 8.2% over the past year, underperforming the S&P 500 by 5.5 percentage points during the same period [2] ETF Overview - The iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF has an Assets Under Management (AUM) of $6.29 billion and a current price of $152.27 as of January 21, 2026 [2][4] - The ETF offers a dividend yield of 0.8% and a one-year total return of 8.18% [2] - The fund targets small-cap growth equities, with at least 80% of its assets invested in index constituents [6] Investment Strategy - The ETF employs a rules-based, index-tracking approach to provide exposure to the small-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity market [4][6] - The portfolio primarily consists of small-cap U.S. stocks with growth characteristics, maintaining liquidity and diversification [4][6] Implications for Investors - The initiation of a new position in IJT by Lee Financial Co. indicates a perceived opportunity in the fund, elevating it into the top 15 holdings of the firm [7]

Core Insights - Small-cap stocks have historically provided significant rewards for investors who are willing to tolerate volatility in exchange for potential growth [1] Group 1 - Small-cap stocks are characterized by their potential for growth, attracting investors who are patient and can withstand market fluctuations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article compares two small-cap growth ETFs, the iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF (RZG), highlighting their differences in cost, performance, risk, and portfolio composition. Cost & Size - RZG has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while IJT has a lower expense ratio of 0.18% [2][3] - The one-year return for RZG is 12.99%, compared to IJT's 5.75% [2] - RZG offers a dividend yield of 0.36%, whereas IJT provides a higher yield of 0.9% [3] - RZG has assets under management (AUM) of $104.83 million, significantly smaller than IJT's AUM of $6.29 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - RZG experienced a maximum drawdown of 38.33% over five years, while IJT had a lower drawdown of 29.24% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in RZG would grow to $1,199 over five years, whereas the same investment in IJT would grow to $1,266 [4] Portfolio Composition - IJT holds 342 stocks, with significant sector weights in technology (20%), industrials (19%), and healthcare (17%) [5] - RZG tracks a "pure" growth methodology with 135 stocks, heavily weighted towards healthcare at 27% [6] - Top holdings for IJT include Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Armstrong World Industries, and InterDigital, each under 1.4% of assets [5] - RZG's top positions are Progyny, ACM Research, and ARMOUR Residential REIT [6] Investment Implications - RZG focuses on "pure" growth stocks, using a growth score based on sales growth, earnings change to price ratio, and momentum, leading to fewer total holdings compared to IJT [7] - Over the last 12 months, RZG has outperformed IJT, but over the last five years, IJT's return of 21% surpasses RZG's 13.43% [9] - For short-term gains, RZG may be preferable, while IJT is better for long-term gains, lower expenses, broader exposure, and higher dividend yield [10]