Workflow
Supply chain management in luxury fashion
icon
Search documents
Paul & Shark’s, Aspesi’s Judicial Administration Procedures Rejected by Judge
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-28 15:32
Core Viewpoint - A Milan court has rejected the request to place Paul & Shark's parent company Dama SpA and Aspesi's Alberto Aspesi & C. SpA under judicial administration due to insufficient evidence of negligence in auditing their suppliers [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Judge Roberto Crepaldi ruled that there was no proof that the executives of Paul & Shark and Aspesi acted "in concert" in committing any offense [2]. - The case is part of a broader labor abuse investigation initiated by Milan prosecutors, who found that both companies subcontracted manufacturing to Chinese-owned firms allegedly involved in labor exploitation [3]. Group 2: Industry Context - The luxury fashion industry in Italy has faced significant scrutiny over supply chain scandals, impacting its reputation and business practices [4]. - Investigations have revealed connections between major luxury brands, including Tod's, Loro Piana, Valentino, Dior, and Giorgio Armani, and subcontractors involved in sweatshop operations [5]. - Most of these brands have been placed under judicial administration to improve audits and oversight, except for Tod's, which is awaiting a ruling from a different court [6]. Group 3: Ongoing Investigations - The maker of Gommino loafers and three of its managers are under investigation for suspected labor abuses, including ignoring inspection findings related to subcontractors [7]. - Last fall, 13 fashion companies were also scrutinized by Milan prosecutors regarding governance and supply chain audits [8].