Taxation without representation
Search documents
X @Nick Szabo
Nick Szabo· 2026-02-06 22:03
RT The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial)This is present day taxation without representation. ...
Chicagoans erupt in ‘bill-burning’ protest after taxes soar 98%. How to invest in real estate without getting scorched
Yahoo Finance· 2025-12-04 16:01
Core Viewpoint - Homeowners in Chicago's South and West Side are facing an average property tax increase of 98%, with some neighborhoods experiencing spikes of up to 130% due to a new bill [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Increases - Richard Townsell from North Lawndale reported a 75.86% increase in his property taxes, while a friend faced a staggering 237% increase [2]. - The property tax bills must be paid by December 15 in Cook County [2]. Group 2: Community Response - Townsell organized a symbolic "bill burning" ceremony to protest the tax increases, drawing inspiration from the Boston Tea Party [3][4]. - The event aimed to highlight the burden on homeowners in neighborhoods outside the downtown area, who are subsidizing the costs of empty commercial buildings [5]. Group 3: Underlying Issues - The tax hike is attributed to a significant number of vacant commercial properties in downtown Chicago, as stated by County Treasurer Maria Pappas [5]. - Townsell and the community are considering advocating for a 2% cap on property tax increases, similar to California's Proposition 13 [6].
'Taxation without representation': Arizona loses patience, sues Mike Johnson for Grijalva stall
MSNBC· 2025-10-22 04:40
Legal & Constitutional Issues - Arizona Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the Speaker of the House for refusing to swear in a duly elected member of Congress [1][4] - The lawsuit argues that the Speaker is violating the law and the Constitution by depriving 813,000 Arizonans of representation [4] - The Attorney General seeks a court order to allow a judge to swear in the Congresswoman-elect if the Speaker refuses [5] - A court ruling in the 1960s established that no Speaker of the House can deny a duly elected member of Congress from being seated [18] Political Implications - The situation could set a precedent for 2026 if the House changes party control, potentially allowing the Speaker to refuse to seat members from the opposing party [13][16] - The Speaker's actions are seen as playing politics and potentially related to the Congresswoman-elect being the final vote on the Epstein file discharge petition [9][14] - The Republican party has a very small margin in the house [16] Impact on Constituents - The refusal to swear in the Congresswoman-elect deprives 813,000 Arizonans of representation in Congress [4] - Constituents are unable to receive essential services such as assistance with social security, veterans benefits, and healthcare issues [8] - The Congresswoman-elect is unable to address urgent issues such as recent flooding in her district [7]