Core Viewpoint - C.H. Robinson is advocating for the reaffirmation of federal regulations governing freight transportation to maintain consistency and safety across the logistics industry, as the U.S. Supreme Court reviews a case that could impact freight broker liability under state laws [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Context - The case Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC will determine if freight brokers can be held liable under varying state laws for accidents involving federally licensed motor carriers [1]. - For nearly a century, federal law has exclusively governed motor carrier services, including the decisions made by freight brokers like C.H. Robinson [3]. - Recent court decisions have allowed plaintiffs to challenge brokers' decisions using state law, potentially imposing liability on brokers for accidents caused by licensed motor carriers [3]. Group 2: Importance of Federal Regulation - Federal law provides a uniform set of rules for freight movement, which is crucial for safety and economic stability [2]. - Congress established uniform federal standards to regulate the motor carrier industry, ensuring that brokers, who do not operate vehicles or select drivers, are not held responsible for accidents [4]. - Allowing state courts to impose different standards could lead to fragmentation, conflicting rules, and increased costs in the supply chain [6]. Group 3: Future Implications - C.H. Robinson is set to present its oral argument before the Supreme Court on March 4, 2026, emphasizing the need for a unified federal framework to ensure safety and reliability in transportation [6].