Điện phở đóng cửa thì ém trong căn nhà này gần 100 cán bộ chiến sĩ. >> Oh wow. [âm nhạc] >> Bắt đầu nó vào đây là dí súng ngay đầu.>> Mày nói nữa tao bắn mày không bắn đó. >> Bắn chết tại đây hai người. >> Wow.Dạ ông cụ bắt tra tấn chết đi sống lại bao nhiêu lần rồi cuối cùng nó mấy tháng sau nó đưa ra tòa nó xử 20 năm khổ sai biệt đi cung đảo >> thì mấy tháng sau ba 4 tháng sau thì gặp mẹ >> thế xong sau đó thì I'm sorry I'm sorry know story know I mean this is your history to right and the thing is there ...

Government Overreach & Media Restrictions - The Pentagon is limiting journalists' access, requiring them to agree not to publish certain information unless approved by defense officials, even if unclassified [1] - This policy change is viewed as an attempt by the government to control the narrative and restrict independent reporting [13] - Critics argue this turns Pentagon reporters into press agents, hindering their ability to expose waste, mismanagement, and issues affecting military personnel [7][8] - The policy is seen as a potential violation of the First Amendment and a threat to the role of the press as a watchdog [21] Historical Parallels & Concerns - The situation is compared to historical events like the Vietnam War and Watergate, where government deception was exposed by the press [16][19] - There are concerns that the lessons of Watergate are being forgotten, with potential abuses of power and restrictions on free reporting [18] - The public's support for independent media is crucial to ensure government accountability and the well-being of soldiers and citizens [22] Reactions & Resistance - Press organizations and reporters have widely condemned the Pentagon's new rules, with many vowing not to abide by them [11][12] - Despite the administration's stance, there is uncertainty about the enforceability of these restrictions [12]