Coast Guard Interdiction Policy Concerns - The analysis suggests that approximately 25% of Coast Guard boat interdictions off the coasts of Miami and California do not involve drugs, raising concerns about potential errors in current procedures [1] - The industry emphasizes the importance of established protocols for boarding boats, including verbal warnings and escalation of force, rather than immediate destruction [2] - The analysis questions the justification for blowing up boats without proper identification or due process for those on board [4][6] Potential Geopolitical Implications - The report raises concerns about the possibility of the boat incidents being a provocation to instigate regime change in Venezuela, potentially leading to military intervention [3] - The industry highlights the importance of congressional oversight and debate regarding military actions, particularly concerning the use of force without due process [4] Due Process and Policy Implications - The analysis underscores the importance of due process, even for accused criminals, citing the possibility of wrongful accusations [5] - The industry argues against a policy of indiscriminately destroying ships without knowing the identities of those on board, both domestically and internationally [6]

From @WSJopinion: U.S. interdiction of ships and planes carrying drugs is nothing new, but surgical strikes aimed at drug labs and kingpins would be. There are better ways of fighting the cartels—and Claudia Sheinbaum will help, writes @MaryAnastasiaOG. https://t.co/xJ8GzytAyP ...