laws of war
Search documents
‘There was no fog of war’: New video of boat strike ALARMS lawmakers
MSNBC· 2025-12-05 02:18
Allegations of Wrongdoing and Misconduct - The report focuses on allegations against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, including ordering a second strike on shipwrecked individuals [3][8] - Hegseth is accused of using a private signal chat for sensitive military plans, potentially compromising DoD information [11][12] - Allegations of past misconduct, including accusations of abuse and sexual assault, are highlighted [17] Controversial Boat Strike Incident - The core issue is a drone strike that killed individuals described as drug traffickers, but questions arise about the justification for a second strike on survivors [2][3] - Lawmakers who viewed the full video expressed concerns, describing the victims as shipwrecked and incapacitated [6] - Congressman Smith stated that the individuals were sitting on a capsized boat for 45 minutes to an hour before the second strike [20] - The justification for the strike, that the survivors could return to the fight or that cocaine was still under the boat, is questioned [21][22] Political and Public Scrutiny - The White House is perceived as trying to shift blame for the incident to Navy Admiral Bradley [9] - Republican Senator Tillis stated that the buck has to stop with the Secretary of Defense [9] - There are calls for the video of the strike and the legal justification for such strikes to be made public [23][24] - Congressman Smith believes Hegseth should testify before Congress and the American people to justify his actions [25]
'Has to be an investigation': 4-Star General on boat strike fallout
MSNBC· 2025-12-03 18:17
Military Operations & Legal Concerns - The Trump administration authorized strikes that were not congressionally approved, drawing scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans [4] - Secretary Hegsth's explanations regarding the second strike on September 2nd have been inconsistent, raising questions about competence and truthfulness [5][6][7] - There are concerns about potential war crimes and whether the US military is adhering to the laws of war [17][18][19] - The administration is perceived as potentially redefining the laws of war and the definition of "war" to justify lethal force against drug traffickers [21][22][23][24] Drug Interdiction & Geopolitical Strategy - The effectiveness of current US military efforts in the Caribbean to combat drug trafficking is questioned, despite significant resources deployed [13][14] - The focus on Venezuela is questioned, with the speaker suggesting the real center of the drug problem is in Colombia, where cocoa production has tripled in the last 10 years [15] - The speaker suggests a potential motive for the US presence in the Caribbean is to force Maduro out of power and gain access to Venezuela's oil reserves, estimated at 300 million barrels [14] Congressional Oversight & Accountability - Admiral Bradley is expected to testify before Congress regarding the decision to execute the second strike [2][3][11] - Congress has been absent in authorizing the use of military force, which is their constitutional responsibility [16] - There is a call for a congressional investigation into the events surrounding the strikes and Secretary Hegsth's role [10]
'Not credible at all': Intel Cmte. member reacts to Secretary Hegseth's boat strike remarks
MSNBC· 2025-12-03 15:32
Congressional Oversight & Legal Compliance - Congressional defense committees legally require military execute orders within 15 days of issuance [1] - Senator Reid states that legally entitled information has not yet been received [3] - Ensuring the military fulfills its legal obligations is critical, especially regarding the laws of war [6] Concerns Regarding Military Operations - Concerns exist regarding the legality of military employment in law enforcement activities [4] - Specific incidents, such as a second strike potentially involving survivors, raise concerns about law violations [4] - Questions arise about the nature of combat in the Caribbean and whether the "fog of war" explanation is applicable [7] Secretary of Defense Hegsth's Actions & Competence - Secretary Hegsth's comments are deemed not credible [10] - Secretary Hegsth is criticized for lacking competence, self-discipline, temperament, and capability [10] - Secretary Hegsth allegedly shared classified war plans over a non-government communication system [11] - A Pentagon Inspector General report on the "signal gate" incident is expected to be made public [12]
‘Double-decker sandwich of illegality’: Trump Pentagon head Hegseth accused of 'war crime'
MSNBC· 2025-12-02 00:59
Alleged War Crime Investigation - The report focuses on allegations of a war crime involving a military air strike in the Caribbean, ordered by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegath, targeting suspected drug smugglers [1][2] - Lawmakers from both parties suggest the strike is illegal if the reporting is accurate, potentially constituting a war crime due to targeting survivors [3][4] - The Pentagon's manual for the laws of war states that attacking incapacitated individuals is dishonorable and inhumane [5] - Senate and House Armed Services Committees will investigate the matter [5] Administration's Response and Justification - Pete Hegsath and the Pentagon deny the accusations, maintaining the actions were lawful [8] - The administration has conducted at least 21 strikes resulting in 83 fatalities, with the legality of these actions being debated [8] - The White House claims the strike was conducted in self-defense to protect American interests [19] - Critics argue the self-defense claim is implausible, as interdicting drug boats is a common practice without resorting to lethal force [20][21] Legal and Ethical Concerns - Legal experts argue that it's unclear if the actions in the Caribbean constitute a war, making the killings extrajudicial [16][17] - Concerns are raised about the administration acting as judge, jury, and assassin in the "war on drugs" [18] - Historical precedent is cited, noting that individuals were prosecuted after World War II for similar actions of killing survivors [14][27]