We've been talking about this show on Netflix for quite some time, the past couple weeks, Joe and I. Uh, House of Dynamite paints a picture of what could happen if the US faces a rogue nuclear missile. Joining us, the movie's director, this is big time.Kathern Bigalow is with us and writer Noah Oppenheim. Good morning to both of you. It's nice to see you.>> Morning. >> Congratulations on the film. Uh, I've now watched it twice.Um, and it's no, it keeps you on the edge of your seat. We've been we've been tal ...

Film Overview - "A House of Dynamite" is a high-stakes thriller about the US government responding to a nuclear threat, focusing on the critical "18 minutes to decide the fate of the world" [1] - The film aims to portray an accurate representation of the reality of nuclear threat scenarios and the processes involved, based on research and interviews with experts from Stratcom, the Pentagon, and the White House [8][9] - The film emphasizes the human element in decision-making processes within these institutions, highlighting that individuals with personal lives and potential human flaws are responsible for critical choices [10][11][12] Nuclear Threat & Defense - The film explores the precariousness of the nuclear age and the potential for a single accident or bad actor to trigger a global catastrophe [6][7] - The movie depicts a scenario where the mid-course missile intercept system fails, leading to a debate with the Pentagon regarding the accuracy of real-world missile defense systems [17] - The film's writer respectfully disagrees with the Pentagon's assessment, asserting that the movie's depiction of the missile defense system's imperfection is accurate, based on consultations with missile defense experts [17][18] Pentagon's Response & Industry Conversation - The Pentagon issued an internal memo criticizing the film's depiction of missile defense capabilities, arguing that real-world testing shows a "vastly different story" [14][15] - The filmmakers welcome the conversation initiated by the Pentagon's response, viewing it as an opportunity to discuss and potentially improve the existing missile defense system [16][18]