RT Mike P (@mikepat711)For a while, I mostly ignored Elon’s narrative about Dems wanting to strategically import people to the USA to win elections. Just seemed too conspiratorial to me and not interesting.But after seeing all of the polling coming out showing overwhelming bipartisan consensus on voter ID laws, and still seeing big Dems push their “voter ID laws are racist” propaganda, it’s hard for me to ignore. It’s extremely odd to me how hard some Dems are pushing this agenda when almost none of their c ...

Political Strategy - The analysis suggests Donald Trump's call to end the filibuster is not about policymaking or resolving the government shutdown, but about consolidating power [1][2][4] - The strategy involves pushing for restrictive voter ID laws and limiting mail-in and early voting, which would be easier to achieve without the filibuster [6] - The analysis indicates Trump is attempting to influence Republican governors to gerrymander seats and using tactics to create fear, potentially to suppress voting [5] Election Concerns - The analysis suggests Trump is concerned about the outcome of the next midterm elections, fearing a loss of power if Democrats regain control of Congress [7] - The analysis points out Trump's awareness of negative political sentiment, referencing a recent "shellacking" [7] Voting Rights - The analysis highlights proposed changes to voting procedures, including stricter voter ID requirements, limitations on mail-in voting (except for military and the sick), and a preference for single-day voting [4]