Core Viewpoint - The Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during a specified class period [1][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's executives failed to disclose rising costs associated with key infrastructure projects, which negatively impacted the company's financial outlook [4]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - Allegations include that costs for the Gordie Howe International Bridge and other projects were increasing due to subcontractor errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [4]. - Fluor reported a second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, missing estimates by $570 million [5]. - Following the disappointing financial results, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [5]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Fluor securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [6]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is the law firm representing investors in this case, known for securing significant monetary relief for investors in securities fraud cases [7].

, /PRNewswire/ -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) securities between February 28, 2025 and July 31, 2025. Fluor provides engineering, procurement, and construction ("EPC"), fabrication and modularization, and project management services worldwide. For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003. The Allegations: Robb ...

NEW YORK, Oct. 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) between February 18, 2025 and July 31, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important November 14, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Fluor securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT ...

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and certain Texas highways, faced rising costs due to subcontractor errors and delays [2][3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit claims that Fluor failed to disclose significant cost increases related to key projects, which were attributed to design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 is claimed to be unreliable, with overstated risk mitigation strategies and understated economic impacts [3]. Group 3: Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which represented a 5.9% year-over-year decline and missed estimates by $570 million [4]. - The disappointing results were attributed to rising costs in infrastructure projects and reduced capital spending by clients [4]. - Following the announcement of these results, Fluor's stock price fell by over 27% [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) for allegedly concealing significant cost overruns and execution problems on key infrastructure projects, leading to a sharp decline in stock value and investor confidence [1][3][4]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue driver among its three segments [2]. Allegations and Issues - The lawsuit claims that FLR concealed cost overruns and execution issues on major projects such as the Gordie Howe International Bridge, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, supply chain inflation, and construction delays [3]. - The company allegedly overstated its risk mitigation strategies and failed to disclose the full impact of reduced client spending and macroeconomic uncertainty [3]. Financial Performance - Despite the ongoing issues, FLR reaffirmed its financial guidance in May 2025. However, on August 1, 2025, the company reported second-quarter results that significantly missed expectations, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43 (missing by $0.13) and revenue of $3.98 billion (missing by $570 million) [4]. - Following these disappointing results, FLR cut its full-year guidance and experienced a stock price drop of 27.04%, closing at $41.42 on August 1, 2025. Analysts subsequently downgraded the stock due to lost confidence in management's disclosures and project oversight [4].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's executives failed to disclose rising costs associated with key infrastructure projects, which negatively impacted the company's financial outlook [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit claims that costs for the Gordie Howe International Bridge and other projects increased due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [4]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers, significantly affected Fluor's business and financial results [4]. - Fluor's second quarter 2025 results showed a non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, missing estimates by $570 million [5]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Following the disappointing earnings report, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [5]. - The company provided a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025, citing client hesitation due to economic uncertainty [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, No. 25-cv-02496 (N.D. Tex.), and it involves purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Interested parties have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor failed to disclose increasing costs related to key infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and the I-635/LBJ and I-35 highways, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 was unrealistic and that the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies was overstated [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which represented a 5.9% year-over-year decline and fell short of estimates by $570 million [4]. - The disappointing results were attributed to rising costs in infrastructure projects and reduced capital spending by clients, leading to a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025 [4]. - Following the announcement of these results, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [4]. Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Fluor securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [5]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, seeking damages for affected investors [1][2]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC), fabrication and modularization, and project management services globally, operating through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions [4]. Financial Performance and Guidance - In February 2025, Fluor projected adjusted EBITDA for FY 2025 to be between $575 million and $675 million, and adjusted EPS between $2.25 and $2.75 per share, which was reaffirmed in May 2025 despite acknowledging potential negative impacts from economic uncertainty [6]. - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported Q2 2025 results, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, also missing estimates by $570 million [8]. - The revised financial outlook for FY 2025 was adjusted to an EBITDA of $475 million to $525 million and EPS of $1.95 to $2.15 per share, significantly lower than previous guidance [8]. Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's executives made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and financial health, particularly concerning rising costs in key infrastructure projects and the impact of economic uncertainty on operations [7]. - Following the disappointing Q2 results and disclosures about project issues, Fluor's stock price fell by $15.35 per share, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 on August 1, 2025 [9].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, due to alleged misrepresentation of the company's financial condition and undisclosed issues with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue contributor [2]. Allegations and Investigation - The investigation focuses on claims that FLR misrepresented its financial health and concealed rising costs and delays in key infrastructure projects, specifically the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which are vital to its Urban Solutions segment [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, FLR reported disappointing Q2 2025 results, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.43 and revenue of $3.98 billion, missing consensus estimates by $0.13 and $570 million, respectively. The company also reduced its full-year forecast, attributing the shortfall to project execution failures and a slowdown in new contract awards. Following this announcement, FLR's stock price fell over 27%, closing at $41.42 on the same day [4]. Market Reaction - In the wake of the disappointing results, several brokerages downgraded FLR's stock, citing significant concerns regarding the company's internal controls and transparency [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during a specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and two Texas highways, faced rising costs due to subcontractor errors and delays [2][3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit claims that Fluor failed to disclose significant cost increases and the negative impact of reduced customer capital spending on its business [3]. - Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 is alleged to be unrealistic, with overstated risk mitigation strategies and understated economic uncertainty impacts [3]. - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, missing estimates by $570 million [4]. Group 3: Impact of the Lawsuit - Following the disappointing earnings report, Fluor's stock price fell by more than 27% [4]. - The lawsuit highlights the connection between the company's project difficulties and its financial performance, indicating a potential long-term impact on investor confidence [3][4]. Group 4: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in this class action lawsuit, known for securing significant monetary relief for investors in securities fraud cases [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].