Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - BKV reported a net loss of $79 million or a loss of $0.93 per diluted share for Q1 2025, while adjusted net income was $35 million or a positive $0.41 per diluted share after removing unrealized derivative losses [27] - Combined adjusted EBITDAX was just over $100 million, with $90 million from upstream operations and $10 million from the Power joint venture [26][30] - Accrued capital expenditures for the quarter were $58 million, significantly below the low end of the guidance range of $75 million [27] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The upstream business produced 761 million cubic feet equivalent per day, exceeding the midpoint of guidance, with development CapEx spending at $48 million, 26% below the midpoint of the guided range [13][14] - The Power joint venture's adjusted EBITDA was $20 million for the quarter, with BKV's implied 50% share being $10 million, driven by higher pricing due to cold weather [24] - The carbon capture business is on track with significant milestones, including a partnership with Comstock Resources and a $500 million investment commitment from Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners [10][11][20] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - ERCOT revised its 2031 load forecast higher by 68 gigawatts, a 45% increase from 2024 projections, primarily driven by data centers [23] - Power prices averaged $54.52 per megawatt hour, with an average realized spark spread of $25.39 per megawatt hour [25] Company Strategy and Development Direction - BKV is focused on vertical integration across its four business lines: upstream, midstream, carbon capture, and power generation, aiming to create premium margins and differentiated products [5] - The company is leveraging its position in the Barnett Shale, which is experiencing a renaissance, to optimize capital expenditures and enhance operational efficiencies [12][13] - BKV aims to capitalize on the growing demand for decarbonized energy solutions, particularly in the context of data centers and the broader energy transition [11][20] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the robustness of the 45Q tax credit and the bipartisan support for carbon capture initiatives, which are expected to drive growth in the CCUS sector [4][43] - The company anticipates continued strong demand for natural gas and power, particularly in Texas, driven by economic development and the expansion of data centers [8][23] - Management remains cautious about macroeconomic headwinds, including inflation and potential tariffs, but believes in the resilience of its business model [5][30] Other Important Information - BKV's cash and cash equivalents at the end of Q1 were approximately $15 million, with a net leverage ratio of less than 0.7 times [28] - The company has a strong balance sheet and increased its borrowing base to $850 million, reflecting confidence in its financial position [29] Q&A Session Summary Question: Thoughts on the resiliency of the 45Q tax credit and momentum behind CCUS projects - Management believes the 45Q tax credit is robust and enjoys bipartisan support, which is critical for energy competitiveness in the U.S. [43][44] - There is strong momentum in carbon capture, particularly for natural gas processing projects, with BKV positioned as a leader in this space [45][46] Question: CapEx for CCUS and potential changes - Management indicated that while the internal CapEx for CCUS remains unchanged, the timing may shift as they optimize capital spending with their new JV partner [54][55] Question: Upstream production growth inclination - Management reiterated a disciplined approach to capital investment, with a commitment to 2% to 3% growth in production by Q4 2025 compared to Q4 2024, while monitoring macroeconomic conditions [60][62] Question: Differences in project timing with Comstock - Management explained that the development of projects with Comstock will follow a phased approach, allowing for growth as Comstock increases production [68][70] Question: Funding mechanisms for the new JV with CIP - Management confirmed that there is an upfront capital component associated with the JV, which will be drawn down over the next 12 to 24 months as projects are deployed [82][83] Question: Willingness to pay a premium for decarbonized power and gas - Management noted that while not all customers are willing to pay a premium, there is a segment, particularly large tech companies, that are very interested in decarbonized energy solutions [85][86]

Corporation May 9, 2025 BKV Important Notice and Disclaimer | About BKV | | --- | | Quarterly Highlights | | Business Units Overview: Upstream & Midstream | | Business Units Overview: CCUS | | Business Units Overview: Power | Financial Overview Appendix 2 Important Notice and Disclaimer 3 About BKV BKV is an Energy Solutions Leader 4 Natural gas production location Wyoming County, Pennsylvania 5 • • • • • BKV Delivers Value Beyond the Sum of Its Parts | ⚫ | | --- | | ⚫ | | ⚫ | | ⚫ | ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫⚫ 6 BKV ...

Core Viewpoint - U.S. Energy Corporation has completed a strategic acquisition for $0.2 million, enhancing its industrial gas and carbon capture platform in Montana, which includes approximately 2,300 net acres with CO2 rights and an active Class II injection well for CO2 sequestration [1][3][5] Acquisition Details - The acquisition strengthens U.S. Energy's position in the Kevin Dome structure, known for its helium-rich and CO2-dominated gas systems [5] - The Class II injection well is permitted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act, ensuring compliance for safe CO2 storage [2][5] Strategic Implications - This acquisition aligns with U.S. Energy's broader strategy to develop scalable, low-emission industrial gas operations and positions the company as a supplier of clean helium and other critical gases [3][4] - The company plans to submit a Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) plan to the EPA for the Class II well in Q2 2025, supporting its environmental goals [5] Management Commentary - The CEO of U.S. Energy emphasized that the acquisition is a significant milestone in integrating carbon sequestration into the industrial gas platform, enhancing the company's ability to deliver clean helium while sequestering CO2 at scale [4]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a net loss of $57 million in Q4 2024, primarily due to net derivative losses of $58 million, resulting in a negative $0.68 per diluted share [46] - Adjusted net income for Q4 2024 was approximately $1 million, or a positive $0.01 per diluted share, after adjusting for unrealized derivative losses and other non-recurring items [47] - For the full year 2024, the company generated positive adjusted free cash flow of $92 million, with an overall adjusted free cash flow margin of 15% [45] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The upstream business produced 774 million cubic feet equivalent per day in Q4 2024, exceeding the midpoint of guidance by 5% [20] - The average annual daily production for 2024 was 788 million cubic feet equivalent per day [22] - The Power JV's implied share of net loss during Q4 was about $17 million, with adjusted EBITDA of $0.5 million [38] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The average capacity factor for the Temple plants during Q4 was 38%, with total generation of 1,200 gigawatt hours [37] - Power prices averaged $36.90 per megawatt hour in Q4, with average natural gas costs of $2.50 per MMBtu, resulting in an average spark spread of $19.37 per megawatt hour [37] - ERCOT's long-term load forecast estimates overall demand could reach 150 gigawatts by 2030, nearly doubling the 2023 peak load of 85 gigawatts [10] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to redefine the concept of an energy company by combining traditional and new energy approaches, focusing on integrated energy solutions [8] - The Power business is expected to grow through increased utilization of existing assets and potential M&A opportunities [12] - The company is actively pursuing additional combined cycle units to address projected demand growth and baseload supply mismatch [13] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the long-term demand growth in ERCOT, despite short-term price moderation due to benign weather and renewable additions [11] - The company remains committed to capital discipline and systematic investment in response to market conditions [41] - Management highlighted the importance of carbon capture in decarbonizing the global economy and expressed confidence in the CCUS business growth [14][16] Other Important Information - The company plans to increase total capital expenditures for 2025 to between $320 million and $380 million, with approximately $220 million allocated for development [43] - The company is in exclusive negotiations with a global energy transition investor for a joint venture in the carbon capture business, with a timeline to finalize agreements within 90 to 120 days [16] Q&A Session Summary Question: How much capacity would the company be comfortable dedicating to a PPA? - Management indicated that they would be comfortable dedicating up to 750 megawatts of capacity for a PPA, maintaining redundancy for maintenance [59] Question: What is the latest on discussions regarding PPAs and new plants? - Management confirmed active discussions for existing plants and is also exploring agreements for new plants, indicating a strong market position [61] Question: What is the expected CCUS capital spending? - Approximately $90 million of the $130 million guidance for CCUS and other is expected to be spent on CCUS projects, with no assumption of a joint venture at this time [69][71] Question: What is the outlook for production taxes? - Management clarified that lower production taxes were due to timing impacts related to ad valorem taxes, which are expected to normalize [75][77] Question: What factors drove the strong upstream performance? - The strong performance was attributed to new well development exceeding forecasts and effective base decline management [105] Question: What is the company's strategy regarding potential joint ventures for carbon capture? - Management expressed optimism about securing a joint venture partner, emphasizing bipartisan support for carbon capture initiatives [115]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a net loss of $57 million in Q4 2024, translating to a negative $0.68 per diluted share, primarily due to net derivative losses of $58 million [31] - Adjusted net income for Q4 2024 was approximately $1 million, or a positive $0.01 per diluted share, after adjusting for unrealized derivative losses and other non-recurring items [31] - For the full year 2024, the company generated positive adjusted free cash flow of $92 million, with an overall adjusted free cash flow margin of 15% [30][31] - The company anticipates total capital expenditures for 2025 to be between $320 million and $380 million, with approximately $220 million allocated for development and $130 million for CCUS and other [29] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The upstream business produced 774 million cubic feet equivalent per day in Q4 2024, exceeding the midpoint of guidance by 5% [15] - The average annual daily production for 2024 was 788 million cubic feet equivalent per day, showcasing strong performance and effective base decline management [17] - The Power JV's average capacity factor during Q4 was 38%, with total generation of 1,200 gigawatt hours [25] - The Power JV is targeting a gross 2025 adjusted EBITDA range of $130 million to $170 million, reflecting the impact of additional renewable generation and lower forward pricing [27] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - ERCOT's long-term load forecast estimates overall demand could reach 150 gigawatts by 2030, nearly doubling the 2023 peak load of 85 gigawatts, with data center developments accounting for approximately half of this growth [8] - Power prices in Q4 averaged $36.9 per megawatt hour, with average natural gas costs of $2.5 per MMBtu, resulting in an average spark spread of $19.37 per megawatt hour [26] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to redefine the concept of an energy company by combining traditional and new energy approaches to offer integrated energy solutions [6] - BKV is actively engaging in M&A markets and expects significant opportunities for transactions in the next few years [9] - The company is exploring building additional combined cycle units to address the projected mismatch between structural demand growth and baseload supply [9] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about long-term demand growth in ERCOT, anticipating that demand growth will outpace supply additions, particularly baseload supply [9] - The company remains committed to capital discipline and systematic CapEx investment, focusing on free cash flow [29] - Management highlighted the strong bipartisan support for carbon capture initiatives, which is expected to drive growth in this sector [11] Other Important Information - The company made its debut on the New York Stock Exchange in September 2024, marking a significant milestone [6] - The CFO announced his retirement, expressing confidence in the company's future leadership and direction [24] Q&A Session Summary Question: How much capacity would the company be comfortable dedicating to a PPA? - Management indicated that they would be comfortable dedicating up to 750 megawatts of capacity to a PPA, allowing for maintenance redundancy [38] Question: What is the latest on discussions regarding PPAs and new plants? - Management confirmed active discussions regarding existing power plants and is also exploring agreements for new plants, indicating a strong market position [41][44] Question: What is the expected capital spending for CCS? - Management clarified that approximately $90 million of the $130 million guidance for CCUS and other is expected to be allocated for CCUS spending [48] Question: How does the company view the current gas prices and upstream activity? - Management stated that they remain committed to a disciplined CapEx investment approach and will reassess their investment strategy based on market conditions in the second half of 2025 [54][56] Question: What are the margin economics of the new CCS contract? - Management indicated that the margin from the new CCS contract is comparable to previous projects, around $50 per ton EBITDA margin [61] Question: Will the company look outside ERCOT for new facilities? - Management confirmed that they are actively looking outside ERCOT for new opportunities, emphasizing the scalability of their business model [103]