记者丨 曹媛 编辑丨孙超逸 在当下的外贸生意中，越来越多的商家注意到用稳定币，用来开展跨境支付。 稍早前，21世纪经济报道记者前往"全球最大的小商品集散地"义乌，调查商户使用稳定币情况 发现： 大多数商户表示并未听说过稳定币、不了解；还有商户对其合规性、成本等提出质 疑；仅有个别商户支持稳定币收款。 （→ 详情 ） 而在中国"电子第一街"深圳华强北，这里具有庞大的电子元器件交易市场，同样聚集了众多来 自全球各地的供应商与采购商。 稳定币是指一种价值锚定法币的加密货币，以目前规模最大的稳定币USDT为例（常简称 为"U"），1USDT锚定1美元。今年，在美国及中国香港立法取得进展的驱动下，稳定币赛道 在全球迎来热潮。 中国"电子第一街"深圳华强北（摄/曹媛） 个别商户表态"试水" 在21世纪经济报道记者走访过程中，华强北个别商户表示会使用或尝试使用稳定币进行交易。 一位经营3C电子产品的商家说，"身边有人在用稳定币炒币。我会考虑用稳定币境外收款，但 目前还没有成交过。" 除线下走访外，记者随机在线上平台咨询了20余位华强北商户，其中两家表示可以收稳定币。 另一位稳定币承兑商在线上告诉记者，"一些'老外'会询问是 ...

当前美股市场正处于多重因素交织的关键节点：高盛上调标普500指数回报率预期、T 朗普政府关税政 策引发企业成本担忧、上市公司加密资产配置行为持续增加，这些动向不仅左右着美股短期走势，更与 加密货币市场形成显著联动。XBIT 作为连接传统金融与加密生态的去中心化交易平台，正通过技术特 性为投资者提供跨市场应对策略。 高盛上调标普预期，美股与加密资产联动性增强 币界网数据显示，高盛最新报告将标普500指数3个月、6个月和12 个月的预期回报率分别上调至+ 3%（6400 点）、+6%（6600 点）和 + 11%（6900 点），引发市场对美股新一轮上涨周期的讨论。值得 注意的是，这一预期调整与美国现货比特币 ETF 近期持续净流入形成呼应，显示机构资金在传统股市 与加密市场的配置平衡正在发生变化。 图片来源:币界网 XBIT 去中心化交易所平台数据显示，标普500成分股中持有加密资产的公司数量已达47家，较去年同 期增长38%。"美股上市公司的加密资产配置行为正在成为连接两个市场的关键纽带"，XBIT 分析师指 出，其平台上追踪美股与加密货币关联度的指标显示，近30天两者相关性系数升至0.62，为2023年以来 ...

打着"迪拜黄金交易所DGCX"旗号的理财平台"鑫慷嘉"爆雷了！ 据北京商报报道，近日，"DGCX鑫慷嘉"在社交平台引发热议，网传这一平台共计200万名投 资者参与其中，涉案金额高达130亿元。网传图片显示，在平台资金无法提现兑付后，公司创 办人黄鑫在会员交流群中高调宣称，其本人已在国外。 图源：社交平台 另据深圳卫视直新闻援引香港《星岛日报》报道，一个名为"鑫慷嘉"的平台，利用迪拜石 油、大数据、USDT稳定币等诸多概念，导致多达200万会员沦为苦主，涉款130亿元人民币， 该平台于6月底爆雷。 号称日息1%高收益 无法兑付后再次"收割" 图源：北京商报 今年4月8日，迪拜黄金和商品交易所发布警示消息称，DGCX在中国并未设立任何合作伙伴 关系或关联机构。任何声称与DGCX存在此类联系的实体或个人，均未获得DGCX的官方授 权。 据金融界报道，鑫慷嘉是盗用迪拜黄金与商品交易所（Dubai Gold & Commodities Exchange, DGCX）名义，谎称自己是DGCX交易所的中国分站。平台以虚拟货币投资为幌子， 承诺每 日1%的高额收益率，通过USDT进行资金结算。投资者需缴纳最低1000USDT ...

Core Viewpoint - The adoption of stablecoins for cross-border payments is still limited among merchants in key Chinese markets, with many expressing a lack of understanding and concerns about compliance and costs [1][2]. Group 1: Merchant Awareness and Usage - Most merchants in Yiwu and Shenzhen are unaware of stablecoins, with only a few expressing interest in using them for transactions [1][2]. - A small number of merchants indicated they might consider using stablecoins for international payments, but none reported having completed such transactions [2]. - Merchants primarily rely on traditional payment methods like cash and Alipay for foreign transactions, with one merchant mentioning a recent $30,000 transfer via Alipay [2]. Group 2: Stablecoin Characteristics and Market Dynamics - Stablecoins, such as USDT, are pegged to fiat currencies, providing a more stable alternative compared to other cryptocurrencies [1][4]. - The market for stablecoins has gained traction globally, particularly following legislative progress in the US and Hong Kong [1]. - The exchange process for stablecoins involves "U merchants" who facilitate the conversion between stablecoins and fiat currencies, often charging fees and setting minimum transaction amounts [3]. Group 3: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - The use of stablecoins for cross-border payments in China faces significant regulatory challenges, as current laws prohibit the use of virtual currencies for such transactions [4][5]. - Legal experts emphasize that while personal trading of virtual currencies may be permissible, using them for business transactions is fraught with compliance risks [5].

Core Viewpoint - The TBAC committee has submitted materials to the Treasury Department regarding stablecoins, addressing their impact on Treasury demand, dollar hegemony, the expansion of dollar-backed payment stablecoins, and potential effects on deposit-holding institutions [2][10]. Group 1: Development of the Stablecoin Market - Stablecoins are digital assets designed to maintain price stability by anchoring their value to reserve assets like fiat currencies [3][12]. - The stablecoin market has evolved rapidly, driven by institutional interest, regulatory frameworks, and broader on-chain applications, experiencing significant events over the past four years, including the collapse of Terra (UST) in May 2022 and the regional bank crisis in March 2023 [3][20]. - The market is projected to reach a valuation of approximately $2 trillion by 2028, influenced by evolving market dynamics and incentive mechanisms [28]. Group 2: Legislative Framework for Stablecoins - The GENIUS Act, passed by the U.S. Senate in 2025, aims to establish the first federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, significantly impacting the future of dollar-pegged stablecoins [4][31]. - Key provisions of the GENIUS Act include defining stablecoins, reserve requirements, disclosure and auditing mandates, and consumer protection measures [35]. Group 3: Impact on Bank Deposits - The design of stablecoins will determine their potential impact on bank deposit flows, with non-interest-bearing stablecoins likely leading to a shift towards tokenized money market funds for yield capture [5][37]. - If stablecoins offer interest, they may attract funds from traditional deposits, enhancing their global appeal, especially among existing on-chain holders [5][37]. Group 4: Impact on U.S. Treasury Market - Stablecoin issuers currently hold over $120 billion in short-term U.S. Treasury bills, with projected incremental demand for U.S. Treasuries reaching approximately $900 billion by 2028 due to stablecoin growth [6][43]. - The transition of funds from bank deposits to stablecoins may lead to increased demand for U.S. Treasuries, potentially exacerbated by trust crises or de-pegging events [6][43]. Group 5: Impact on Money Supply - The growth of stablecoins may catalyze a shift of funds from traditional bank deposits to stablecoins, influencing the movement of money from M1/M2 to stablecoins without significantly altering the total money supply [7][49]. Group 6: Market Structure Implications - Historical de-pegging events have highlighted the need for more robust market access mechanisms for stablecoin issuers, akin to banking regulations [8][52]. - The GENIUS Act's stringent reserve requirements aim to prevent "breaking the buck" scenarios, drawing lessons from past money market fund reforms [8][53].

Core Viewpoint - The "Xin Kang Jia" platform is suspected to be a Ponzi scheme combined with a multi-level marketing structure, leading to significant financial losses for investors, with estimates of around 13 billion yuan involved and approximately 2 million investors affected [3][19][24]. Group 1: Platform Structure and Operations - "Xin Kang Jia" was initially presented as a platform for oil and commodity trading, later claiming to engage in futures trading linked to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), promising high returns of up to 0.2% daily [4][10]. - The platform utilized a nine-level hierarchical structure to incentivize recruitment, with varying rewards based on the number of direct referrals, creating a system that heavily relied on new investor contributions to pay returns to earlier investors [10][11]. - The platform's operations involved the use of stablecoins like USDT for transactions, complicating the process for new investors who often transferred funds to higher-level members for conversion, thus bypassing direct investment [15][16]. Group 2: Regulatory Warnings and Risks - Regulatory bodies had issued multiple warnings regarding the risks associated with "Xin Kang Jia," highlighting its illegal fundraising activities and the lack of legitimate investment projects [17][18][24]. - The DGCX publicly denied any affiliation with "Xin Kang Jia," emphasizing that the platform had no authorization to operate under its name, further indicating the fraudulent nature of the claims made by the platform [6][19]. - The rise of stablecoins has led to a resurgence of similar schemes, with many platforms adopting these digital currencies to evade financial regulations, posing significant risks to investors [20][24]. Group 3: Investor Experiences and Consequences - Many investors were lured into the scheme by promises of high returns and the belief that the investment was legitimate, often encouraged by friends or acquaintances [14][23]. - Once the platform collapsed, investors found themselves unable to withdraw their funds, leading to widespread panic and the dissolution of investor groups [14][22]. - The investigation revealed that the platform's associated company had a registered capital of 30 million yuan but had not actually contributed any capital, raising further red flags about its legitimacy [14].

巴基斯坦政府：批准虚拟资产法案，设立独立监管机构以许可和监管加密货币行业。 ...

Group 1: Stablecoin Overview - Stablecoins are digital currencies anchored to a reference value, primarily traditional financial assets, with Tether (USDT) and USDC being the largest, valued at $156.7 billion and $61.8 billion respectively, together accounting for over 85% of the total market[30] - The total market capitalization of stablecoins reached approximately $232 billion by March 2025, a nearly 45-fold increase from $5.2 billion at the end of 2019[31] - Stablecoin transaction volume approached $35.5 trillion in the past 12 months, with $7.4 trillion in payments settled, indicating significant growth compared to traditional payment platforms like PayPal and Mastercard[36] Group 2: Regulatory Developments - The U.S. is enhancing its stablecoin regulatory framework through the STABLE Act and GENIUS Act, requiring a 1:1 reserve ratio with assets like U.S. dollars or short-term U.S. Treasury securities[54] - U.S. stablecoins, particularly USDT and USDC, hold over $170 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, ranking them as the 17th largest holder, surpassing countries like Germany and South Korea[48] - Hong Kong's Stablecoin Ordinance, effective August 1, 2025, allows for a more inclusive regulatory environment, permitting reserves in multiple currencies and maintaining a 1:1 reserve requirement[63] Group 3: Market Implications - Stablecoins are expected to play a crucial role in reshaping the international financial system, particularly in cross-border payments, due to their efficiency and low costs[70] - The integration of stablecoins with Real World Assets (RWA) is anticipated to create a sustainable growth environment, leveraging blockchain technology to enhance trust and efficiency in asset transactions[74] - The demand for decentralized and efficient payment solutions is increasing as countries seek to reduce reliance on traditional dollar-based systems amid geopolitical tensions[70]

公司研究 CoreWeave (CRWV.O)：收购 Core Scientific，加速布局 AI 数据中心 CoreWeave (CRWV.O)：收购 Core Scientific，加速布局 AI 数据中心 事件：当地时间 7 月 7 日（周一），AI 云服务巨头 CoreWeave (CRWV.O) 宣布将以约 90 亿美元的全股票交易收购加密货币数据中心运营商 Core Scientific (CORZ.O)。CoreWeave 股价当日下跌 3%，7 月 8 日续跌 5%； CoreScientific 股价当日则重挫近 18%，7 月 8 日续跌 5%。此前，在媒体 报道双方正在进行收购谈判后，两家公司股价于 6 月底均出现上涨。 交易条款 交易影响 表 1：财务预测 | 截至 12 月 31 日 | 2023A | 2024A | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | （百万美元） | | | | | | | 营业收入 | 229 | 1,915 | 5,050 | 11,530 | 16,418 | | ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the impact of Trump's tariff policy, which will impose a maximum 40% tariff on 14 countries including Japan, indicating a tough stance in trade negotiations [1] - The market is experiencing fluctuations but is making gradual progress near the 3500-point mark, with a potential for a small upward trend in July [1][3] - Technology stocks are showing strong performance due to favorable half-year reports, suggesting a positive outlook for this sector [1][3] Group 2 - The upcoming significant meeting at the end of July may lead to regulatory adjustments that could benefit sectors like solar energy and new energy [1][3] - The overall market sentiment remains optimistic, with several sectors, including stablecoins and electricity, not showing signs of weakness [1][3] - Investors are advised to hold onto their stocks and wait for price dips rather than chasing high prices [1][3]