Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's executives failed to disclose rising costs associated with key infrastructure projects, which negatively impacted the company's financial outlook [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit claims that costs for the Gordie Howe International Bridge and other projects increased due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [4]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers, significantly affected Fluor's business and financial results [4]. - Fluor's second quarter 2025 results showed a non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, missing estimates by $570 million [5]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Following the disappointing earnings report, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [5]. - The company provided a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025, citing client hesitation due to economic uncertainty [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, No. 25-cv-02496 (N.D. Tex.), and it involves purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Interested parties have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor failed to disclose increasing costs related to key infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and the I-635/LBJ and I-35 highways, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 was unrealistic and that the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies was overstated [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which represented a 5.9% year-over-year decline and fell short of estimates by $570 million [4]. - The disappointing results were attributed to rising costs in infrastructure projects and reduced capital spending by clients, leading to a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025 [4]. - Following the announcement of these results, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [4]. Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Fluor securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [5]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, seeking damages for affected investors [1][2]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC), fabrication and modularization, and project management services globally, operating through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions [4]. Financial Performance and Guidance - In February 2025, Fluor projected adjusted EBITDA for FY 2025 to be between $575 million and $675 million, and adjusted EPS between $2.25 and $2.75 per share, which was reaffirmed in May 2025 despite acknowledging potential negative impacts from economic uncertainty [6]. - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported Q2 2025 results, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, also missing estimates by $570 million [8]. - The revised financial outlook for FY 2025 was adjusted to an EBITDA of $475 million to $525 million and EPS of $1.95 to $2.15 per share, significantly lower than previous guidance [8]. Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's executives made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and financial health, particularly concerning rising costs in key infrastructure projects and the impact of economic uncertainty on operations [7]. - Following the disappointing Q2 results and disclosures about project issues, Fluor's stock price fell by $15.35 per share, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 on August 1, 2025 [9].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, due to alleged misrepresentation of the company's financial condition and undisclosed issues with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue contributor [2]. Allegations and Investigation - The investigation focuses on claims that FLR misrepresented its financial health and concealed rising costs and delays in key infrastructure projects, specifically the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which are vital to its Urban Solutions segment [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, FLR reported disappointing Q2 2025 results, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.43 and revenue of $3.98 billion, missing consensus estimates by $0.13 and $570 million, respectively. The company also reduced its full-year forecast, attributing the shortfall to project execution failures and a slowdown in new contract awards. Following this announcement, FLR's stock price fell over 27%, closing at $41.42 on the same day [4]. Market Reaction - In the wake of the disappointing results, several brokerages downgraded FLR's stock, citing significant concerns regarding the company's internal controls and transparency [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during a specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and two Texas highways, faced rising costs due to subcontractor errors and delays [2][3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit claims that Fluor failed to disclose significant cost increases and the negative impact of reduced customer capital spending on its business [3]. - Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 is alleged to be unrealistic, with overstated risk mitigation strategies and understated economic uncertainty impacts [3]. - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, a 5.9% year-over-year decline, missing estimates by $570 million [4]. Group 3: Impact of the Lawsuit - Following the disappointing earnings report, Fluor's stock price fell by more than 27% [4]. - The lawsuit highlights the connection between the company's project difficulties and its financial performance, indicating a potential long-term impact on investor confidence [3][4]. Group 4: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in this class action lawsuit, known for securing significant monetary relief for investors in securities fraud cases [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation and certain executives for allegedly making false and misleading statements during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1][2][3] Company Overview - Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, fabrication, modularization, and project management services through its Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions segments [2] - The Urban Solutions division was the largest contributor to revenue and profit during 2024 and early 2025 [2] Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Fluor and its executives failed to disclose significant issues, including rising costs tied to major infrastructure projects, customer reductions in capital spending, and unrealistic financial guidance [3][7] - Specific allegations include overstating the effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies and downplaying risks from economic conditions [7] Financial Performance - In February 2025, Fluor issued FY 2025 guidance of adjusted EBITDA between $575 million and $675 million and EPS between $2.25 and $2.75 [7] - In May 2025, the guidance was reaffirmed despite acknowledged market uncertainty [7] - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported Q2 results with EPS of $0.43, missing estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, down 5.9% year-over-year and $570 million below expectations [7] - Following these disclosures, FY 2025 guidance was cut to adjusted EBITDA between $475 million and $525 million and EPS between $1.95 and $2.15, citing project cost overruns, delays, and client spending hesitation [7] Market Impact - Following the August 1, 2025 disclosures, Fluor's stock price dropped 27%, closing at $41.42 per share [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for allegedly misleading investors regarding its business prospects and financial guidance during a specific period in 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit claims that Fluor failed to disclose rising costs associated with major projects due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, significantly impacted Fluor's business and financial results [2]. - Following the release of disappointing financial results for Q2 2025, Fluor revised its financial outlook for FY 2025, projecting adjusted EBITDA of $475 million to $525 million, down from $575 million to $675 million, and adjusted EPS of $1.95 to $2.15, down from $2.25 to $2.75 [3]. Group 2: Stock Price Reaction - After the negative financial disclosures, Fluor's stock price dropped by $15.35 per share, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 per share on August 1, 2025 [3]. Group 3: Class Action Participation - Shareholders who wish to participate in the class action must submit their papers by November 14, 2025, to serve as lead plaintiff [4]. - Participation in the case is not required to be eligible for recovery, allowing shareholders to remain absent class members if they choose [4]. Group 4: Legal Representation - Robbins LLP operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses unless the case is won [5]. - The firm has a history of advocating for shareholder rights and holding company executives accountable since 2002 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during a specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, and it includes purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, with a deadline of November 14, 2025, for seeking lead plaintiff status [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor's costs for major infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and Texas highways, were increasing due to subcontractor errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Impact - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which was a 5.9% year-over-year decline and fell short of estimates by $570 million [4]. - The disappointing financial results were attributed to rising costs in infrastructure projects and reduced capital spending by customers, leading to a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025 [4][3]. - Following the announcement of these results, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [4].

Group 1 - A shareholder has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1] - Fluor Corporation is described as a company that provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC), fabrication and modularization, and project management services worldwide [1]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue for Q2 2025 was $4 billion, with consolidated new awards of $1.8 billion, 72% of which were reimbursable [6][25] - Total backlog remains around $28 billion, with 80% being reimbursable [7] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 was $96 million, down from $165 million a year ago, and adjusted EPS was $0.43 compared to $0.85 [27][38] - Operating cash flow for the quarter was an outflow of $21 million, compared to cash generation of $282 million a year ago [31] Business Segment Data and Key Metrics Changes - Urban Solutions reported a profit of $29 million, impacted by a $54 million net cost growth on three infrastructure projects [8][14] - Energy Solutions segment profit was $15 million, down from $75 million a year ago, due to nearing project completions and an arbitration ruling [16] - Mission Solutions reported a segment profit of $35 million, down from $41 million a year ago, due to a temporary stop work order [21] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company noted a slowdown in client investment decisions due to trade policy uncertainties and cost escalations [23][24] - There is strong demand in the mining sector, but immediate enthusiasm for major capital deployment is tempered by global trade uncertainty [12][24] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focusing on markets such as mining, advanced manufacturing, data centers, and life sciences for future growth [48][49] - The strategic sale of NuScale shares is being pursued, with a conversion of 15 million shares expected to enhance capital return objectives [35][36] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management indicated that client sentiment is cautious due to ongoing trade discussions and cost uncertainties, impacting long-term investment decisions [23][24] - The company expects that once trade agreements stabilize, clients will accelerate investments in various end markets [24][96] Other Important Information - The company achieved significant milestones on the LNG Canada project, including the shipment of the first LNG cargo [20] - The company is revising its 2025 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $475 million to $525 million, reflecting market hesitancy and project delays [38] Q&A Session Summary Question: Insights on bookings environment and backlog growth - Management acknowledged that trade policy impacts client sentiment and investment decisions, but they are pursuing work in the right markets [44][50] Question: NuScale conversion mechanics and future plans - The conversion of 15 million shares is expected to provide tax benefits and facilitate monetization without significant cash leakage [51][53] Question: Cash flow implications of LNGC change order - The JV structure means that cash flow will be realized when dividends are made, following the collection of funds related to the change order [105] Question: Infrastructure project performance and future outlook - Management expressed disappointment with recent project results but emphasized a commitment to addressing issues and learning from past experiences [85][88]