Core Insights - Special dividends are one-time cash payouts that can significantly enhance yield for investors, often overlooked by mainstream financial websites [1][2] - Companies like Pilgrim's Pride and Amerisafe exemplify special dividend payers, with yields that can double or triple the regular dividend [2][11] - Business Development Companies (BDCs) are notable for their regular special dividends, providing attractive yields [13] Group 1: Special Dividend Overview - Special dividends can yield significantly higher returns than stated yields, with some stocks showing yields as high as 13.8% when including special distributions [1][3] - A special dividend is often a result of extraordinary profits or cash influxes, such as asset sales [1][2] Group 2: Company Examples - Pilgrim's Pride (PPC) recently paid a special dividend of $6.30 per share, resulting in a yield of 12.7% [2] - Buckle (BKE) has a stated dividend yield of 3.2%, but the actual yield with specials is 9.0%, showcasing its strategy of modest regular dividends supplemented by larger special dividends [4][6] - Amerisafe (AMSF) has a stated yield of 3.3%, but with special dividends, the yield rises to 9.7%, reflecting its approach to managing dividends amid profit fluctuations [9][11] Group 3: Business Development Companies (BDCs) - Gladstone Investment Corp. (GAIN) has a stated yield of 6.4%, but with specials, the yield increases to 14.3%, highlighting its unique investment strategy [14][18] - Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) offers a stated yield of 11.3%, which rises to 13.8% with special dividends, indicating strong financial backing and investment strategy [19][21] - Barings BDC (BBDC) has a stated yield of 11.3% and an actual yield of 12.9% with specials, reflecting its recovery and strategic investment approach [24][28]

Group 1 - BDCs (Business Development Companies) are characterized as high-risk assets due to their reliance on providing capital to companies that lack access to affordable financing from traditional banks [1] - The inability of certain companies to secure financing from traditional banks is a significant factor contributing to the high-risk nature of BDCs [1] Group 2 - Roberts Berzins has over a decade of experience in financial management, focusing on helping top-tier corporates with financial strategies and large-scale financings [1] - Berzins has contributed to institutionalizing the REIT framework in Latvia to enhance the liquidity of pan-Baltic capital markets [1] - His policy-level work includes developing national SOE financing guidelines and frameworks for channeling private capital into affordable housing [1]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of a hybrid investment strategy that combines classic dividend growth stocks with Business Development Companies, REITs, and Closed End Funds to enhance investment income while achieving total returns comparable to traditional index funds [1]. Investment Strategy - The investment approach focuses on high-quality dividend stocks and assets that provide long-term growth potential, which can significantly contribute to income generation [1]. - A balanced portfolio that includes both growth and income-generating assets can lead to efficient investment income while maintaining a total return aligned with the S&P [1].

Core Viewpoint - Bill Ackman's Pershing Square fund is transforming Howard Hughes Holdings into a diversified holding company, similar to Berkshire Hathaway, presenting an investment opportunity for those looking to leverage Ackman's expertise [2][16]. Group 1: Investment Portfolio Overview - Pershing Square's equity portfolio is valued at $13.6 billion, with over half invested in three key stocks: Uber Technologies, Brookfield, and Howard Hughes Holdings [3]. Group 2: Uber Technologies - Uber represents 19% of Pershing Square's equity portfolio, with an investment of approximately $2.3 billion, now valued at around $2.6 billion [5]. - Ackman believes concerns regarding autonomous vehicles negatively impacting Uber's value are unfounded, as Uber's extensive network of over 170 million users is valuable for self-driving car companies [6]. - Uber's EBITDA increased by 35% last quarter, supported by a 14% rise in gross bookings, with expectations for similar growth in the upcoming quarter [7]. - The company generated $2.3 billion in free cash flow last quarter, a 66% year-over-year increase, with a goal to convert over 90% of EBITDA into free cash flow in the next three years [8]. - Uber's stock trades at an enterprise value-to-EBITDA ratio of about 25, which is considered attractive given its 30% annual EBITDA growth [9]. Group 3: Brookfield - Brookfield accounts for 17% of the portfolio, with a total investment value of about $2.4 billion after acquiring an additional 6.1 million shares [10]. - The company has a unique corporate structure with several publicly traded subsidiaries, including Brookfield Asset Management, which owns 73% of its shares [11]. - Distributable earnings rose by 27% year-over-year in the first quarter, with management projecting a cash flow growth rate exceeding 20% annually through 2029 [12]. - Brookfield's shares trade at 13.8 times trailing distributable earnings, with Ackman suggesting a valuation multiple of at least 16 [13]. Group 4: Howard Hughes Holdings - Howard Hughes Holdings makes up 14% of the portfolio, with Ackman acquiring a 47% stake worth about $1.9 billion [14]. - The company's assets are valued at $5.9 billion, indicating the stock is trading at a discount [15]. - Management anticipates net operating income growth of up to 4% in 2025, with long-term projections indicating a 37% increase from 2024 levels [15]. - Ackman plans to diversify Howard Hughes by adding an insurance business, which would provide capital for further investments [16]. - The new structure incurs a quarterly fee of $3.75 million to Pershing Square, along with a 0.375% incentive fee, but may offer investors a direct way to invest in Ackman's strategies [17].

Group 1 - Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ: CGBD) has shown signs of weakness similar to other Business Development Companies in the market [1] - The investment strategy discussed involves a combination of classic dividend growth stocks, Business Development Companies, REITs, and Closed End Funds to enhance investment income [1] - The approach aims to achieve a total return comparable to traditional index funds like the S&P [1]

以下文章来源于华尔街见闻 ，作者李笑寅 华尔街见闻 . 华尔街见闻App是中国领先的金融信息和商业资讯提供商，为用户甄选国内和全球重要资讯，7*24小时全年不间断。 来源：华尔街见闻 AI独角兽Builder暴雷背后，是一场印度程序员假扮AI的惊天骗局。 Builder.ai，这个自诩"AI开发神器"的独角兽，估值一度高达15亿美元，拿下微软、软银和卡塔尔投资局超4.5亿美元融资，却在2025年5月轰然倒塌。 从"AI写App像点披萨一样简单"的炫目口号，到背后全是印度工程师"人肉操作"的尴尬真相，再到虚报收入、伪造合同的财务黑洞，这场长达八年的骗局 让投资者血本无归，也给AI热潮下的市场狠狠敲响了警钟。 01 神话起点：从"点披萨一样简单"到AI独角兽 Builder.ai的故事始于2016年，由创始人Sachin Dev Duggal打造。 这位"简历自带神话滤镜"的印度企业家，14岁组装电脑，17岁为德意志银行开发套利系统，21岁创办估值1亿美元的初创公司。 2016年，他创立了Engineer.ai（后改名Builder.ai），承诺用AI帮企业构建应用程序，将复杂的软件开发简化为"像点披萨一样简单" ...

从"AI写App像点披萨一样简单"的炫目口号，到背后全是印度工程师"人肉操作"的尴尬真相，再到虚报收入、伪造合同的财务黑洞，这场长达八年的骗局让投 资者血本无归，也给AI热潮下的市场狠狠敲响了警钟。 神话起点：从"点披萨一样简单"到AI独角兽 Builder.ai的故事始于2016年，由创始人Sachin Dev Duggal打造。 这位"简历自带神话滤镜"的印度企业家，14岁组装电脑，17岁为德意志银行开发套利系统，21岁创办估值1亿美元的初创公司。 2016年，他创立了Engineer.ai（后改名Builder.ai）， 承诺用AI帮企业构建应用程序，将复杂的软件开发简化为"像点披萨一样简单"的体验。 (图片由豆包AI生成） AI独角兽Builder暴雷背后，是一场印度程序员假扮AI的惊天骗局。 Builder.ai，这个自诩"AI开发神器"的独角兽， 估值一度高达15亿美元，拿下微软、软银和卡塔尔投资局超4.5亿美元融资，却在2025年5月轰然倒塌。 在AI尚未商用、No-Code赛道刚兴起的年代，这个概念直接引爆了投资圈。 从印度创投圈到硅谷，Builder.ai迅速成为"无代码+AI"的当红炸子鸡 ...

Builder.ai，这个自诩"AI开发神器"的独角兽，估值一度高达15亿美元，拿下微软、软银和卡塔尔投资局超4.5亿美元融资，却在2025年5月轰然倒 塌。 从"AI写App像点披萨一样简单"的炫目口号，到背后全是印度工程师"人肉操作"的尴尬真相，再到虚报收入、伪造合同的财务黑洞，这场长达八 年的骗局让投资者血本无归，也给AI热潮下的市场狠狠敲响了警钟。 神话起点：从"点披萨一样简单"到AI独角兽 Builder.ai的故事始于2016年，由创始人Sachin Dev Duggal打造。 AI独角兽Builder暴雷背后，是一场印度程序员假扮AI的惊天骗局。 这位"简历自带神话滤镜"的印度企业家，14岁组装电脑，17岁为德意志银行开发套利系统，21岁创办估值1亿美元的初创公司。 2016年，他创立了Engineer.ai（后改名Builder.ai），承诺用AI帮企业构建应用程序，将复杂的软件开发简化为"像点披萨一样简单"的体验。 在AI尚未商用、No-Code赛道刚兴起的年代，这个概念直接引爆了投资圈。 从印度创投圈到硅谷，Builder.ai迅速成为"无代码+AI"的当红炸子鸡，融资节奏高举高打。 投资 ...

为什么 Agentic 叙事下 infra 是确定性最高的机会？过去 Agent 开发大多依赖开发者手动使用传统 Infra 搭建，开发工程量大、流程复杂，如何缩小 Agnet 的开 发难度和周期是一个确定性需求。随着 Agent 开发需求彻底爆发，更多人才和资源投入到新工具搭建中，Agent 开发范式的重构和收敛已经在发生。 另一个视角则是： 如果我们把 Agent 看做互联网使用者和开发者的增量，这些"新用户"的爆发式涌入又会带来什么样的需求？ 本文来自 Agent Infra 创业者 Hang Huang 的投稿，他以自己过去一年通过 AI 辅助进行产品开发的实践经验出发，为我们分享了第二个视角下 Agent Infra 的 在这篇文章中，他提了一个很有意思的观点" AI 的终极目标，不是帮人写代码，而是获得对整个软件生命周期的控制权 ：从构思到上线，再到持续运维"， 随着 AI 对工具利用深度和主动程度不断变化， AI-native Infra 也在相应进化，Hang Huang 把 AI-native 的 Infra 划分为了 5 个阶段，L0-L5，"在L5 阶段的 Agent-Native OS ...

周四A股商场高开高走、小幅震动上行，早盘股指高开后震动上行，盘中沪指在3368点邻近遭遇阻力，午 后股指维持震动，盘中软件开发、互联网服务、消费电子以及计算机设备等职业表现较好；珠宝首饰、贵 金属、美容护理以及食品饮料等职业表现较弱，沪指全天基本呈现小幅震动上扬的运行特征。当时上证综 指与创业板指数的均匀市盈率分别为13.69倍、35.80倍，处于近三年中位数均匀水平，适合中长时间布 局。两市周四成交金额12136亿元，处于近三年日均成交量中位数区域上方。北向资金接连净流入，南向 资金加仓港股；ETF份额回升，产业资本净增持，商场流动性韧性增强。估计短期商场以稳步震动上行为 主，主张以方针导向为主线，兼顾成绩确定性与估值修正潜力。仍需亲近重视方针面、资金面以及外盘的 变化状况。短线主张重视软件开发、互联网服务、计算机设备以及消费电子等职业的出资机会。 指数继续在合理水平震动。未来，商场的机会将取决于商场的增量性变化，商场如因外部风险、基本面、 出资者心情等因素导致意外下行，则从"安稳"的维度看，维稳资金的呵护将有助于商场阶段性底部的形 成，商场也将由此呈现下有底的特征。如果商场接连震动特征，则应结合高质量开展 ...